I'd be interested in hearing the opinions of folks on this forum, since it's far more sedate than some others....
:-D No kidding :-D
Personally I think that the TGs did a pretty fair job. Not perfect...nuthin is...but not bad. Of course, they are only representing what their constituancy thinks The BP standard was a fair and workable solution to a perceived problem that was beginning to arise in SASS. I would have prefered something else, but it's a start down a better road, in my not so humble opinion. :wink:
I will be very interested in seeing what the comittee comes up with on the tabled Short Stroke issue! (strongly suspect that it will die in comittee, but that's a whole other issue) For informational purposes I add that NCOWS Congress simply voted them down flat! No ifs, ands, or buts......and while their philosophy is similar to SASS, there are vast differences in some areas! I applaud them for sticking to that philosophy!
The real suprize to me has been the debate over # 10,
Should we change the issue (safety penalty) of empty shells left on the carrier of an
open shotgun or rifle to a no call issue?
which failed! The amount of acrimony over that one, on the SASS website, really caught me by surprize! I would have thought that that one was a no brainer, but some folks will make a fuss about anything! For me, it's a simple safety rule and if yer having problems with it, then ya better get yer gun fixed! :roll:
