Author Topic: Ruger action compared to Mauser & Winchester  (Read 873 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline The Sodbuster

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 387
Ruger action compared to Mauser & Winchester
« on: April 23, 2006, 12:12:20 PM »
Exactly what is the difference between the current Ruger action and a true Mauser action, and the current (or former) Winchester Model 70 action?  I know they're all controlled-round feed, but how do they differ?

Offline oso45-70

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1918
  • Gender: Male
Re: Ruger action compared to Mauser & Winchester
« Reply #1 on: April 23, 2006, 08:15:04 PM »
Quote from: The Sodbuster
Exactly what is the difference between the current Ruger action and a true Mauser action, and the current (or former) Winchester Model 70 action?  I know they're all controlled-round feed, but how do they differ?


Sodbuster They are pretty much the same, The feel of three will be a little different but as far as a big difference there is none. They are all good strong actions, From this point on its just a matter of choice. I have rifles made by all three companys and love them all. :D ..........Joe........
LIFE NRA BENEFACTOR
LEAA LIFE MEMBER
GOA MEMBER
CCKBA MEMBER
AF & AM
NAHC LIFE
NMSSA MEMBER
ATA MEMBER

Profanity is the crutch of a crippled brain

Offline msorenso

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 705
Ruger action compared to Mauser & Winch
« Reply #2 on: April 24, 2006, 04:15:58 AM »
Good question I had always wondered myself?  When the 70's were normal priced were the m77 in lets say the safari grades worth the extra $600 if so why? :D
LIVE FREE OR DIE

Offline targshooter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 491
Ruger 77, Win 70 Comparison
« Reply #3 on: April 29, 2006, 04:20:16 PM »
:D
I own 6 Ruger Model 77 Mark II rifles and two Winchester Model 70 CRF rifles. On occasion, the Ruger rifles will not pick up the cartridge in the extractor as it emerges from the magazine and the rifle functions as a push feed. A balked loading stroke (starting the forward stroke with a subsequent rearward motion once the cartridge has just cleared the magazine) makes this a high probability in the Rugers. In the Winchester 70s I own, the claw has the cartridge the second it leaves the magazine, and a balked loading stroke drags the cartridge back with the bolt. I suppose I would use the Winchesters for dangerous game with a little more confidence, but a positive forward stroke in either rifle results in a chambered round. I have never had any failure to extract in either rifle brand, so I consider this a minimal point.
The safety on the Ruger is more to my liking than that on the Winchester, but both function fine. The floor plate release on the Ruger is also inside the trigger guard and more to my liking, as are the factory iron sights supplied on the Ruger.
The bolt dissembly mechanism of the Winchester is a little more user friendly than the Ruger, but again, both suffice.
The Ruger breech is flat as on the 98, whereas the Model 70 breech is coned like a Springfield.
The Winchester trigger is more to my liking and simpler than that of the Ruger.
Those are the differences which readily come to mind.