Very Good Point Bubba!
Every negative I hear about the Spanish barrels deals with the 10,000 PSI proof mark and because they use "soft" steel. However, I was about to ask what Bubba brought up... how many of these injuries are the product of "ruptured" barrels.
When you talk about nipples blowing out... I can show you my 36" barreled Pennsylvania that will spit nipples with anything over 60 grains of black powder under a patched ball. Of course I have to ask myself did I check to see if they were correctly tightened? etc. etc.
I chose my Traditions Pursuit because (1) the type of action has been around forever in shotguns and break open single shot rifles so it is a strong action and (2) there is nothing to blow back in the direction of your face... no nipples, no bolts, plungers, springs, etc.
I'd love to see documented evidence of barrel failure... and quite frankly the 10,000 PSI proof mark has been waved as evidence when it seems to have become a "straw man" to use for target practice for those who have a prejudice.
And as to the matter of becoming afraid of a gun which has alread proved itself safe at the given load/bullet combination. I wonder if that is the product of too many tirades about the evils of Spanish guns.
So far, from reports I have heard recounted... these gun injuries seem to have been charactistically either in the first use of a gun, or the first use of a "magnum" load. Has anyone document and catagorized (1) what types of guns... actions not brands... are failing and (2) specifically what part on the gun failed.
I presumed that ALL of these tradgic stories came about because those terrible soft steel barrels failed, ruptured and spewed shrapenal.
Some times it feels to me that a lot of guys with "good" guns are really piling on the guys with the "bad" guns to motivate them to sell their "bad" guns and go get a "good" gun?
And since I'm on a rant... to clarify (which Traditions does on their web site) the manufacture of their guns is by Ardesa of Spain
http://www.ardesa.com.
When you look at their site, Ardesa produces a great many different muzzle loaders, but there are no models that look like the in-line guns sold by Traditions. Is Traditions a gun manufacturer... no. Are they simply a gun importer... what they have for sale doesn't represent the models marketed by Ardesa. Therefore, Traditions obviously is involved in defining the secific model manufacturered JUST FOR THEM by Ardesa. That implies AT LEAST design specifications. So let's quit dismissing Traditions as "just" an importer. Hewlett Packard sells products manufacturered overseas, but they are built to HP's specifications.
I'm pretty open minded... and since whatever is proof is stamped on the barrel is a non-issue... let's get specific... show me the guns with the ruptured barrels. That I will believe. Tell me exactly "what" went wrong and I'll listen.
But don't tell me that ALL imported guns are unsafe... or the fact that the stamping of a quirky European proof is justification to pile :cb2: them in the middle of the square and burn them all.