Author Topic: .204?  (Read 435 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline HOG

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 31
.204?
« on: April 10, 2006, 11:52:56 AM »
What Information can you give on the 39g. Blitzking bullwt.  

How doed this bullet perform on ground squirrels?
I'm looking at the following powders:

POWDER BURN RATES: Faster or slower????
http://www.reloadersnest.com/burnrates.asp

Powders for the .204 39g blitzking
1 being the fastest 266 the slowest.

BENCHMARK=148
H322=156
H335=166
4895=168
VARGET=181

next question:

39g. Sierra Blitzking or 40g. V-max Looking at bullet reviews from Midway USA I think shooters have given the Blitzking the better accuracy review.

http://www.midwayusa.com/ebrowse.exe/brows...**675***9016***

Serria bullets have a jacket thickness of .009, the Hornady of .014. Looks like the Blitzking may be more explosive in squirrels too.

Thanks,
Steve

Offline PaulS

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1120
.204?
« Reply #1 on: April 11, 2006, 10:04:25 AM »
Steve,

Forget the burn rate charts - use recommended powders from manuals.

When you compare bullets you need to know more than just the jacket thickness - what is the alloy? Is it annealed? What lead alloy are they using? Is it heat treated? Is the jacket scored internally? Is the core bonded to the jacket?
All of these details can change the way the bullet responds to impact. If you call Sierra they will tell you the best bullet that they have for you - they will also tell you if somebody elses bullet is better for you - they will tell you the load that they have had the best accuracy with and the one they get the most velocity out of.
Sierra has more data, more results, and more people who can interpret that data and those results than you can find and trust on the internet. I call them when I need help - and they don't care whether I am using their bullets or someone elses - They just help shooters get the answers they need.
PaulS

Hodgdon, Lyman, Speer, Sierra, Hornady = reliable resources
so and so's pages on the internet = not reliable resources
Alway check loads you find on the internet against manuals.
NEVER exceed maximum listed loads.

Offline gsp71

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 14
HOG
« Reply #2 on: April 12, 2006, 06:57:26 AM »
First off I don’t know about jacket thickness, heat treating and all that. I spent a lot of time working up loads in a Cooper rifle. I tried all the powders you listed and then some. There wasn’t much difference at all. Overall and using Berger 30, 35 and 40 gr., Sierra 32 and 39 and Hornady 32, and 40 gr. bullets, I got the highest velocity and best groups using either H-335 or Win 748. The bullets I settled on were the 32 gr. Sierra and both the 35 gr. And 40 gr. Berger. The 40 gr. Berger will flat smack, at least on diggers. It’s the only bullet I tested that is a hollow point and a boat tail. It is holding up good out to 400 yards and I haven’t shot farther. At least that I know of…! As a side note, no matter what I tried I could not find a combination of loading to make the 32 grain V-Max shoot. As far as group size they were the worst and that was a surprise to me. Another thing I learned with my 204, the faster they go the better they group almost without exception. Bench rest primers turned out to be a must also.

Offline HOG

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 31
.204?
« Reply #3 on: April 12, 2006, 07:23:27 AM »
Thank for the infrmation.  I will call Sierra.  If the weather clears I am off the the range to see what groups.  Again thanks,
steve