Like my kids, they are different but I love 'em all the same. I have 8 NEF/H&R CF rifles, RF rifles, shotgun, muzzleloaders, and slug guns. I have 4 TC's with the same variety of uses. TC's are finished better, nicer wood, more easy to buy barrels - no fitting, more factory variety of calibers, cost more. In my experience, overall TC accuracy is more consistent. NEF/HR not as nicely finished, barrel selection somewhat more limited and have to be fitted, cost less. NEF triggers have been very good lately, some of their rifles are superbly accurate, their slug guns will shoot with anything, anywhere at any price, and their muzzleloaders are generally untemperamental and easy to get shooting very well. Some people love, and others despise the looks, of either breed.
Me, I like both lines very much. I have seen some handsome (to me) examples of each. Some NEF products represent extremely good value as far as I am concerned. I paid $119 for a new Sportster .17HMR that has a great trigger and will shoot .5" at 100 yards. Elegant? No. Value? Oh yeah. I have two NEF Ultra slug hunters that will keep shotgun slugs within 1.5" (often less) at 100 yards. Pretty? Not especially - unless you are looking at the price tag and the target. Some people despise the Encores and Contenders. Me, I like the looks of the TC stocks, I think they have generally very nice wood and look rather exotic. I do know they fit me very well and I like the ergonomics. I have CF rifle barrels, bird barrels, RF rilfe barrels, handgun stocks and barrels, muzzleloader barrels and slug barrels for my TC's.
I think the comparison between the two is very appropriate if you consider that both lines cover just about the same territory in function and selection. TC's cost twice (or more) as much - and people should undertand that better finishing, better wood, wider range of barrels, and finished tolerances that offer more interchangeability cost more. On the other hand, NEF products can often offer all of the the performance at far less cost, but you don't get the nicer wood, nicer finish, etc. I think they both have their place. Which is better? Define "better" as you see it, and you have two good choices. What's not to like?