I've read tons of posts on the merits of the .35 Rem and the .30-30 Win. Personal preference aside, it seems that, in almost all people's experience, the .30-30 will expand, penetrate, and kill deer and black bears just as well as a .35 Remington. Plus, the .30-30 has flatter trajectory, less recoil, and many more choices & better availability (where I live) for factory ammo. So, given all that, why would I want to choose a levergun in .35 Rem over .30-30?
I ask all this because I have found a J.C. Higgins model 45 (which appears to be a Marlin 336 made for Sears) chambered in .35 Remington. It is in great shape, is priced at $225, and for some reason I keep going pulling it off the gun shop's rack. Interestingly, the gun is drilled and tapped for both scope mounts and receiver sights. The barrel is not marked "micro-groove", and, from the muzzle end, it looks to have about 8 grooves (I kept loosing my starting place). So, despite wanting the gun, my practical side says, get a .30-30 because of the reasons I listed above. Am I splitting hairs here, or is there some significant reason I should choose the .35 over a .30-30? (Note: I don't plan to reload any time soon, maybe never, so that isn't a concern.) Any and all experienced thoughts are welcome. Thanks in advance for your help.