My neighbor bought an Explorist for his son. It has 14 channels, while Garmin Legend, and 76C have 12 channels. I believe there are some 16 channel and maybe 18 channel gps units on the market. My understanding is that some of the manufactures are going for more channels to obtain faster lock times. In the case of Garmin and possible Lowrance who is using a SiRf chipset to enhance reception and increase the processor speed. SiRf makes a number of chipsets and it is unknown if they are the same model. Are better processors, better then 14 or 16 channels, I do not know the answer.
My neighbor and I went out on a ridge with about 1/10 of an acre opening with no canopy overhead. We compared the 76C, Legend, and the eXplorist 100. Satellite lock time between the Legend and the eXplorist 100 appeared to be about the same. The 76C was slightly faster. Following the same 2.5 mile course all three units received the same satellites. The number received varied between 5 and 6 satellites. So neither unit received 12 or 14 channels.
I agree I would also like a demo with the updated Magellan 3D Topo software. One review of it says that it has brought it up to the same standard as the Garmin Topo software. I also have the DeLorme Topo software which I can view 3D maps on the pc or print 3D maps. It is a nice feature. I have worked with Topo maps most of my life. To the point the when I see one laying flat on a hood or table I visualize it in the 3D. No I am not on drugs. The Garmin 24K National Park series provides more detail. The problem is that I cannot go elk hunting in National Parks so the software is not worth the investment. Garmin needs to upgrade its standard Topo product to 24K. Most Federal agencies have their own Topo graphic maps. These are more current then the older USGS Topo maps. The software vendors would provide a better product if they copied the agency maps in many cases.
There are more satellites in the works. Both the US and Europe plan on more launches. But most of the US plans are the back burner because of budget constraints. I believe the WAAS/EGNOS satellites broadcast on the same frequency. In the United States there are 25 ground reference stations and a master station on each coast that support that correct the data from the WAAS satellite. So WAAS/EGNOS will function in the US and Europe, but not in Africa or other areas that do not have the ground stations. WAAS/EGNOS satellites are normally in a fixed orbit so there maybe limited or no benefit of an EGNOS satellite to US users unless you make a trip to Europe.
Within the last few months I have received 12 satellites at once with my Garmin units. On that given day could I have received 14 or 16 satellites, I do not know. I have returned to that same spot and number of times and received up to 10 satellites. I do not think we well see more satellites for a while. The current system is aging and new satellites will replace older units. There maybe some short term overlap. Military requirements may also alter the orbit of the satellites.
Accuracy? With limited use the 76Cx has given me 3.5 meters of accuracy without WAAS. When I went to town I started the 76Cx up. Obtain a satellite lock, and then place the unit in the back seat of my pickup. I covered the unit with a jacket. I had it in track mode. When I returned home it shows the track on the map. It showed a full track.
The Garmin 60CX,60CSX, 76CX, 76CSX all have the SiRF StarIII chip.
http://www.sirf.com/products-ss3.html Will the next garmin gps have 20-channels and the SiRF StarIII chip?