Your photos show absolutely nothing of what you are trying to say they show.
Do you mean to say the the highjackers flew the planes into the buildings exactly where demolition charges were placed? Rediculous.
Steel loses much of its strength way before it melts. With the physical damage to the fire proofing it's entirely likely steel would have been exposed directly to flames caused by thousands of gallons of jet fuel & the buildings contents.
I realise this was mentioned, but ignored by you.
First the photos show exactly what I am saying. There are 2 separate from what we can see; unrelated explosions going on here.
Now I am used to people looking at me like I am crazy some times and telling me I am paranoid. I know I am paranoid but it is because what I can see and use logic and reasoning to understand the “who and why”. I guess I am just blessed to have the gift of logical reasoning and common sense and use this with my general knowledge of how things work and don’t work which gives me a different outlook, view and opinion on many things.
For example there is without a doubt 2 separate explosions in the photos. The plane hit the tower between the 81st and 85th floors this caused many windows on the adjacent side of the tower to blow out sending flames rolling out. Yet we have an explosion also blowing out a window or windows in the sky lobby on the 78th floor.
Question How?
So we look at this and we wonder how that could happen. Well it is possible that the explosion of the plane could have caused this, but there should be flames and it should change in physical size and share the same characteristics as what we see from the rest of the explosion. This is if there is only one explosion. But seeing as how we do not see this rather see the opposite one with reasonable common sense will look at the probability of a secondary explosion. Which right there at that very moment when you see that there is the possibility that there could have been a secondary explosion you have to start considering many other things.
Also as to the comment “Do you mean to say the the highjackers flew the planes into the buildings exactly where demolition charges were placed? Rediculous.”
No what is ridiculous is that you are so ignorant to electricity, electronics and the other things that make up the world you live in. To have a controlled demolition you have to have wires running to explosives that can have an electrical charge put to them at the moment one wishes to explode the device. So it is very reasonable and even probable… even more… likely that upon impact many wires were broken and damaged which would have most likely shorted across steel from the structure creating a high voltage arc and or short to dissipate into any wire that was exposed and touching the steel or other conductor. If any of these wires happen to be connected to an explosive charge it is most logical that it would have caused the device to explode seeing how most use 9 to 12 volts to detonate. Now from other footage we can see even more explosions happening as many as 25 floors below the collapse. So from this it is logical that there was a great many devices planted in the building and even more so when you factor that controlled demolitions require many devices and many wires.
So we look at 2 possibilities here and using logic and common sense and knowledge we get this.
A) Small secondary explosion in these photos caused by plane and fuel: not plausible due to the visible characteristics of the explosions and how the differ greatly
b) Small secondary explosions caused by explosive device. Plausible due to visible characteristics of the explosion as it seemed to propel dust as opposed to flame. Possible due to the fact that if there was a secondary device such as those used in a controlled demolition present the possibility for premature detonation is high.
Now as to whom, well I don’t like to point fingers at any one person because I have absolutely nothing that could put one person as responsible. So the most logical thing would be do as most any other investigator would do and look for motive, who gains the most. Also if you think that the sides are so against each other you have the hook in your mouth and should tug real hard to rip it out… It will hurt but it will heal and you learn… unlike most fish who take the bait…
The Media was asked about. Well in fact there have been thousands of voices trying to get the Medias attention but due to the lack of credentials they are mocked and shunned. Even the ones who have the credentials and get on air are quickly told oops were out of time when certain issues are brought up and always with condescending comments from the hosts afterwards… See this is a perfect example of someone speaking based on emotion rather than facts and understanding. If it is such a big hoax and waste of time then get out there look at what we are saying debunk our evidence and show facts to oppose it and I will shut up. But until then I am going to scream as loud as I can “Cover Up”…
As to this comment:
Steel loses much of its strength way before it melts. With the physical damage to the fire proofing it's entirely likely steel would have been exposed directly to flames caused by thousands of gallons of jet fuel & the buildings contents.
Part of this is true; steel does lose strength before it melts. But what is also true is that the document temperatures are at between 1200 and 1300 degrees. UL which is Underwriter Laboratories who certifies most everything in construction tested sections of steel from the towers for strength and unprotected it lasted 6 hours at 2000 degrees with no sign of weakening. Also based on the amount of burning of the paint from the steel in the area thought to be the impact point the average temperatures are said to be around 500 to 600 degrees. This based on UL tests. Now as to the fire proofing… Do you really think that sprayed on asbestos just fell off? Have you ever seen this stuff? This stuff does not just fall off and in spite of what you might think was not as old as the buildings for it was added years later. Also if it would come off that easy then office doors being slammed would cause it to dislodge and become airborne which would be a huge health risk to the millions of people in NY. Now do you believe that your government would allow that to happen? Because that would be a huge cover up there and god only knows the lawsuits… Or rather; it does not dislodge very easy and there for is the reason that the port authority was given waiver after waiver regarding getting it cleaned up but was told at some point it has to be dealt with.
Also note the FEMA and the Official report say that the fuel was all burnt within roughly the first 10 minutes. And the contents were standard as per fire code. These items would not have burned at high temps nor would they have created enough heat to weaken the steel… this is the reason for fire codes after all…
Again logic with a little common sense exposes things for what they really are. But most people do not want to know… they want people to tell them…
“There is no evidense of controlled demolition except in some peoples imagination.”
Why on earth would one make such an accusation with everything pointing to the opposite to include testimony of most everyone on the scene that day who survived and every single piece of video and audio footage. Look you can not debate an issue without knowing the facts and or evidence that is presented by both sides… it is simply ludicrous. This is the reason in the first post I gave links to the video footage known to be the actual footage and the official and final reports. Take a look at both sides do the math and when 1+1 starts equaling BS then maybe you will see what I can see. But the most likely chain of events will be, people will continue to ridicule TM7 and myself and without even taking the time to see if there is any validity or even a possibility to what we are saying being possible. They will continue to live life as it is moaning about this administration that they so passionately affirm to be so admirable.
People the logical truth to the evidence when look at objectively points to the possibility that in fact “big corporate” controls our government. It is so evident if you will just look around you and think. They also control the media or at least most of it. And as to the question about other countries knowing and saying something, well again if you would look you would find that several other countries have spoke up but was not publicized. One of these was a country that so many here hold near and dear to their heart, Israel, in fact they knew it was going to happen before it happen and told us but we did nothing… know what they did? They packed up all their people who was in the WTC and moved them to another state. Hmm they sound a bit paranoid too don’t they…
Ok here it is… plain and simple… from this point on.... please inform your self before opening your mouth... please...
Matt
