Actually, that's a fabulous reading list, in it's own way.
As a counterpoint though, the assertion that "Mein Kampf" was one of the most 10 harmful books of the last 100 years tells me the person who created that list is mentally opaque at the most profound level. Let me begin by admitting that I only made it about 30 or 40% of the way through MK because of the abysmal style and weak logic; in all honesty, I was terribly disappointed in the work since I was expecting something at least intelligible. I have always had a hobby of reading classic literature (not that MK is classic literature, but it's historically important), and I've always thought it best to read original sources since the intent of original authors is so often mangled by later interpretation (see the Bible and the Catholic Church for an example).
Anyway, the assertion that MK was one of the 10 most harmful books of the past century is absurd. People bought the stupid book AFTER Adolph Hitler rose to power because it was the fashionable (and safe) thing to do. The book is completely the opposite of "The Communist Manifesto" in that regard. The book itself had a meanless impact on Hitler's rise to power, while "The Communist Manifesto" was the cause of Karl Marx's rise to prominence.
The inclusion of MK in that list tells me that the person who created the list is both ignorant of history and DUM.
Disclaimer: I'm Jewish and may therefore admit to having read "Mein Kampf"; if you call me a Nazi, you'll just look DUM, too.
