Author Topic: Taurus 17HMR Revolver  (Read 1246 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cookiemann

  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1749
  • Apple Valley, MN
Taurus 17HMR Revolver
« on: December 16, 2006, 02:22:26 PM »
Anyone have any coments on this gun?  Just saw one in the case at Gander Mtn. today.  I didn't know you could get the 17HMR in a revolver.  Hmmm!
cookiemann

The price on the 17 HMR revolver was $249...is that a good price?  It was new, not used.
NOT ON MY WATCH

"AIM small...MISS small"

Offline Keith L

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3781
Re: Taurus 17HMR Revolver
« Reply #1 on: December 17, 2006, 03:12:40 AM »
IMO 17 HMR is a waste of time in a revolver.  With that little pill it only has velocity going for it.  Out of a revolver velocity is greatly reduced.  I looked at a good used Single Six in HMR but let it go for just that reason.  I think you are better off with a .22.  I have a 17 HMR  Contender pistol, and two rifles in 17HMR and like the round.  But not in a revolver.

Just my 2 cents.
"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy."  Benjamin Franklin

Offline Cookiemann

  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1749
  • Apple Valley, MN
Re: Taurus 17HMR Revolver
« Reply #2 on: December 17, 2006, 04:33:41 AM »
Thanks for the insight.  I guess I really hadn't thought of the loss in velocity by firing from a shorter barrel.  Just thought it was a "Niffty" little revolver, sitting there in the display case.

Thanks, and MERRY CHRISTMAS
NOT ON MY WATCH

"AIM small...MISS small"

Offline Keith L

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3781
Re: Taurus 17HMR Revolver
« Reply #3 on: December 17, 2006, 05:33:32 AM »
With a revlover you loose pressure due to the gap between the cylinder and the barrel as well.  So there is little more than the length of the cylinder.
"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy."  Benjamin Franklin

Offline kmeyer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 49
Re: Taurus 17HMR Revolver
« Reply #4 on: December 17, 2006, 11:59:38 AM »
   I agree with what Keith says about 17hmr losing alot when going from a rifle to a pistol. And then you lose a little more in a revolver. To say "It's a waste" though is a little extreme.  I think the 17hmr pistol  is still much flatter for a further distance than a 22lr pistol. I am a small game pistol hunter and switched to a Taurus 17hmr this year. I was able to cleanly take several Squirrels at distances I would not have tried with my .22 pistrol. This does not mean I am getting rid of my Mark 3 or Single Six. They are fantastic guns! Another thing you must think about is the cost of shooting though between a 22 and 17. Big difference there!


Offline jcn59

  • Trade Count: (37)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1450
  • Gender: Male
Re: Taurus 17HMR Revolver
« Reply #5 on: December 26, 2006, 08:04:59 PM »
I bought one of these in SS for $300. a couple years ago.   Very accurate.   I suppose all the rimfires lose significant velocity in a handgun.  I have a 6"  SS Tracker in .218 Bee that doesn't want to shoot much faster than 2000 fps.   It shoots most accurately at about 1850 fps.
Vote them all out, EVERY election!
 
Does anyone remember the scene from "Quigley Down Under" showing the aborigines lined up on the skyline as far as you could see?   That needs to be US!
NRA Life Member