« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Why the 325 WSM?  (Read 1154 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jimmyp50

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 147
Why the 325 WSM?
« on: January 30, 2007, 11:39:50 AM »
at a real diameter of 8mm for the life of me I would not buy one.  The 300 WSM offers almost the same with better sectional density and more available bullets. 
Logged
Jimmyp50Georgia

Offline R.W.Dale

  • Trade Count: (22)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2170
Re: Why the 325 WSM?
« Reply #1 on: January 30, 2007, 03:41:39 PM »
Quote from: jimmyp50 on January 30, 2007, 11:39:50 AM
at a real diameter of 8mm for the life of me I would not buy one.  The 300 WSM offers almost the same with better sectional density and more available bullets. 


 AH YES grasshopper; But souldn't we ask ourselves; Why the 300WSM. The 300 Win mag offers almost the same with better sectional density via more available bullet weights.
Logged

Offline kudzu

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 590
  • (Dancoman)
Re: Why the 325 WSM?
« Reply #2 on: January 30, 2007, 05:07:26 PM »
I may be wrong , but I believe the 300wsm and 300wm may have the exact same bullet availibiliy.
Logged

Offline Gregory

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1482
  • Gender: Male
Re: Why the 325 WSM?
« Reply #3 on: January 30, 2007, 05:09:53 PM »
Yeah, just offer 12 ga shotguns, a 22LR, and a 30/06.  No real need for anything else is there?

 


Logged
Greg

NRA Endowment Life Member
the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
Second Amendment, U.S. Constitution (1791)

Offline Don Fischer

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1526
Re: Why the 325 WSM?
« Reply #4 on: January 30, 2007, 06:06:28 PM »
Quote from: krochus on January 30, 2007, 03:41:39 PM
Quote from: jimmyp50 on January 30, 2007, 11:39:50 AM
at a real diameter of 8mm for the life of me I would not buy one.  The 300 WSM offers almost the same with better sectional density and more available bullets. 


 AH YES grasshopper; But souldn't we ask ourselves; Why the 300WSM. The 300 Win mag offers almost the same with better sectional density via more available bullet weights.

I assume your talking about factory ammo of which I know very little. If your talking reloads, what bullet that works in the 300 Min Mag won't work in the 300WSM?
Logged
:wink: Even a blind squrrel find's an acorn sometime's![/quote]

Offline R.W.Dale

  • Trade Count: (22)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2170
Re: Why the 325 WSM?
« Reply #5 on: January 31, 2007, 12:26:58 AM »
Quote from: Don Fischer on January 30, 2007, 06:06:28 PM
Quote from: krochus on January 30, 2007, 03:41:39 PM
Quote from: jimmyp50 on January 30, 2007, 11:39:50 AM
at a real diameter of 8mm for the life of me I would not buy one.  The 300 WSM offers almost the same with better sectional density and more available bullets. 


 AH YES grasshopper; But souldn't we ask ourselves; Why the 300WSM. The 300 Win mag offers almost the same with better sectional density via more available bullet weights.

I assume your talking about factory ammo of which I know very little. If your talking reloads, what bullet that works in the 300 Min Mag won't work in the 300WSM?

 YES AND NO! With factory ammo you are limited in bullet choice. And while it's technically possible to use 200grn and heaiver bullets in a wsm you only get 06 level preformance a 300 WM has almost 200 fps (in some cases more) over the top wsm loads with heavy bullets. There's just no replacment for displacment.
Logged

Offline Don Fischer

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1526
Re: Why the 325 WSM?
« Reply #6 on: January 31, 2007, 05:07:31 AM »
Ah! I don't load or shoot any 30 mag's so have only my reloading manual for reference and they do not agree with you. Perhaps a cronograph would tell me a different story.
Logged
:wink: Even a blind squrrel find's an acorn sometime's![/quote]

Offline SDS-GEN

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 461
Re: Why the 325 WSM?
« Reply #7 on: January 31, 2007, 07:46:46 AM »
I won't get into a debate of one cartridge over another, discussions of this nature will go on till the end of time.  As for the 325WSM, Winchester has done this before.  They throw a handful of new cartridges at American hunters all at once, some of them stick some go away.  They did it in the 60s with the 300, 264, 338 and 458 Win Mags, the 300 and 338 caught on big, the 458 is still in use, but the 264 is all but gone.
Logged

Offline Don Fischer

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1526
Re: Why the 325 WSM?
« Reply #8 on: January 31, 2007, 08:06:49 AM »
It just occured to me why the 325WSM. We've talked all the 30 cal's and 338 cal's to death! ;D
Logged
:wink: Even a blind squrrel find's an acorn sometime's![/quote]

Offline R.W.Dale

  • Trade Count: (22)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2170
Re: Why the 325 WSM?
« Reply #9 on: January 31, 2007, 01:15:27 PM »
Quote from: Don Fischer on January 31, 2007, 05:07:31 AM
Ah! I don't load or shoot any 30 mag's so have only my reloading manual for reference and they do not agree with you. Perhaps a cronograph would tell me a different story.

 A quick lookup of Hodgdon's reloading data posted on thier webpage, Is where I got my refrence.

In a nutshell it appears as though a Win mag will propell a 220grn pill as fast as a WSM can push a 200 grainer........... And then of course there's the 250 grain .308 diameter monsters
Logged

Offline jimmyp50

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 147
Re: Why the 325 WSM?
« Reply #10 on: February 01, 2007, 01:46:56 PM »
so you get less sectional density than a 300 WSM, less speed and sectional density than the 300 WM and a lot of less everything than the 338 WM bit all in a cool short case that will not feed as well!
Logged
Jimmyp50Georgia

Offline Mr. Joe

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 283
Re: Why the 325 WSM?
« Reply #11 on: February 02, 2007, 03:22:26 AM »
The .300 wsm doesnt handle the heavys as well as the .300 win mag, the same way as the .308 wont handle the heavys like the .30-06.  Gas tank is a bit smaller and the long bullets sit to deep. Its of no bother to me however as i see no advantage in shooting anything in .30 over 200 gr. anyways. 

There was no need for the .300wsm in terms of a practical cartridge, but its a good round and if it helped the co's sell more guns im all for it!
Logged
I am not afraid to make an example out of you

Offline jimmyp50

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 147
Re: Why the 325 WSM?
« Reply #12 on: February 03, 2007, 09:03:15 AM »
The 300 WSM at least makes some sense with a 200 grain bullet at 2930.  The 325 does not offer any advantage.
Logged
Jimmyp50Georgia

Offline Brithunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2538
Re: Why the 325 WSM?
« Reply #13 on: February 04, 2007, 01:44:14 AM »
Oh Dear  ::)

    So you don't like it ........................................... so what? why keep on about it then.

     Now if I was to consider a WSM the only one I would actually consider is the .325. However it's all hypothetical as getting a variation on my fireaarms certrificate for a .325 is not likely to happen  ???.
Logged

Offline jimmyp50

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 147
Re: Why the 325 WSM?
« Reply #14 on: February 10, 2007, 04:51:44 PM »
What ever blows up your skirt I guess!
Logged
Jimmyp50Georgia

Offline Cheesehead

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3282
  • Gender: Male
Re: Why the 325 WSM?
« Reply #15 on: February 10, 2007, 05:16:49 PM »
They should have made a larger leap and created a 358 wsm. I would like that.

Cheese
Logged
Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance.

Offline R.W.Dale

  • Trade Count: (22)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2170
Re: Why the 325 WSM?
« Reply #16 on: February 10, 2007, 05:21:54 PM »
Quote from: Cheesehead on February 10, 2007, 05:16:49 PM
They should have made a larger leap and created a 358 wsm. I would like that.

Cheese


 I like the way you think.
Logged

Offline poncaguy

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2751
  • Gender: Male
Re: Why the 325 WSM?
« Reply #17 on: February 15, 2007, 11:41:34 AM »
I like the short rounds, have a 270 and 300WSM's in Winchester Super Shadows............and they feed just fine..........super accurate( 1/2" -- 3/4" groups) and mild recoil.
Logged

Offline k3yston3

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 76
Re: Why the 325 WSM?
« Reply #18 on: February 17, 2007, 05:36:21 PM »
8mms are fun.  The 325 wsm was intended to be the shortmag equilvent of the 338wm, while it is close it isn't exactly that.  It is a novel idea and the only one of the factory wsm that interests me...But I'm a sucker for 8mms.  I believe that in performance on game it should excel, but it solves a problem that didn't exist.  One positive side effect is that if it catches on, it will lead to better 8mm bullets... something in between 8x57 and 8mm Remington bullet construction. 
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »