Author Topic: 1911 for Bullseye: Basic with mods or "off the shelf"?  (Read 1467 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Ned

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 61
1911 for Bullseye: Basic with mods or "off the shelf"?
« on: February 07, 2007, 07:25:46 AM »
I'm a novice shooter with limited practice time, weakening eyesight (age 64), and a budget of about $1,000 for a .45 for Bullseye shooting. I have no designs on a state or national championship: a rating of Expert would likely thrill me.

Trying to decide between buying  a basic 1911 for, say,  $5-600 and then having a gunsmith customize the arm for another few hundred versus getting an "off the shelf" target model from one of the major manufacturers (Springfield, Kimber, Para, etc).

Is there a consensus on this site as to which approach is best? Would reliability likely differ much between the two?

Thank you.

Ned

Offline Questor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7075
Re: 1911 for Bullseye: Basic with mods or "off the shelf"?
« Reply #1 on: February 07, 2007, 08:36:53 AM »
Ned:

I am a bullseye shooter too. Your best option, by far, is to buy a used 45 "wad gun" from someone who is selling one. Ask around at a bullseye league and be patient. The gun should include a red-dot sight. This type of sight helps those of us who are in the bifocal set keep shooting comfortably. The only other good alternative is to buy a new wad gun for about $1500.

You should be able to get one for about 1,000. Very, very, few gunsmiths are qualified and knowledgeable on building a bullseye gun. Starting with a $500 gun and turning into a bullseye gun will cost you a total of $1500, assuming you have found someone who can do the work.
Safety first

Offline 44 Man

  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2419
  • Gender: Male
Re: 1911 for Bullseye: Basic with mods or "off the shelf"?
« Reply #2 on: February 15, 2007, 10:41:25 AM »
Colt Gold Cup.  $850 new.  44 Man
You are never too old to have a happy childhood!

Offline Lloyd Smale

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (32)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18278
Re: 1911 for Bullseye: Basic with mods or "off the shelf"?
« Reply #3 on: February 17, 2007, 01:02:52 AM »
what he said. Buy a new gold cup or a kimber gold match and youll have all the gun a beginning bullseye shooter needs
Colt Gold Cup.  $850 new.  44 Man
blue lives matter

Offline Questor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7075
Re: 1911 for Bullseye: Basic with mods or "off the shelf"?
« Reply #4 on: February 19, 2007, 03:45:06 AM »
I respectfully disagree with the previous two posts. The pattern among bullseye shooters who take that advice is to end up buying a dedicated bullseye gun within a couple of years anyway. They are paying twice. I see it all the time. I especially do not recommend stainless guns like some of the Gold Match guns because the slide begins galling after only a few thousand rounds.



Safety first

Offline Lloyd Smale

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (32)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18278
Re: 1911 for Bullseye: Basic with mods or "off the shelf"?
« Reply #5 on: February 20, 2007, 11:53:30 PM »
dont know how many thousands of rounds have been through my stainless trophy match but im sure its well over 50000 and probably closer to 100000 and its as good as the day I bought it and it will still put 5 shots into an inch at 25 yards and used to do 1.5 at 50 when i had eyes that were capable. Its cleaned and oiled about every thousand rounds. I do use a quality lube like tetra on it and change my springs about every 1500 rounds and shoot only ammo loaded at pressures im sprung for but my gun doesnt have a bit of gauling. Only things that have been replaced other then springs are a wilson bullet proof extractor and the slide stop and the extractor was fine when it was replaced. I know of at least 3 guys in the local ppc shooting gang i shoot with that shoot stainless gold cups one other trophy and to match guns and all of those guys swear by them. I now shoot ppc with a kimber gold match and a sti trojan 9mm but still take the old gold cup out and shoot a match occasionaly. I can honestly say that gold cup has been the most reliable 45 auto ive ever owned. In all the rounds i put through it i cant ever remember one malfuntion that wasnt related to a reloading mistake. Id say buy the gold cup or something simualar like a kimber. You may find that a year or two from now you loose interest in bullseye shooting as like ppc shooting it isnt to exciting and if you do you will still have a great self defense gun and plinker and can use it to shoot ppc or action sports with and you wont take the giant hit on resale that you will with a custom bullseye gun. Ive seen them for half of what guys have into them for sale. If you find yourself totaly into it in a couple years you will have your own ideas by then what you think is ideal for you as to brand and custom options and would probably want to build your own anyway and if you do and you no longer have a use for the colt resale value is pretty good on a colt. 
I respectfully disagree with the previous two posts. The pattern among bullseye shooters who take that advice is to end up buying a dedicated bullseye gun within a couple of years anyway. They are paying twice. I see it all the time. I especially do not recommend stainless guns like some of the Gold Match guns because the slide begins galling after only a few thousand rounds.




blue lives matter

Offline Questor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7075
Re: 1911 for Bullseye: Basic with mods or "off the shelf"?
« Reply #6 on: February 21, 2007, 03:44:53 AM »
Lloyd:

There's a difference between bullseye and PPC. Here are the details of why I can't recommend spending money on a generic 1911 (like the gold cup) and a dedicated bullseye gun:

1) By the time a bullseye shooter buys a 45, he already knows he likes the game. They typically start with a generic 22 then realize they need one with a good trigger and a red dot scope. That's where they lose money-- by buying a generic 22 first, then upgrading to a bullseye 22.  Some go on to compound the mistake by buying a generic 45 thinking that it will serve as a bullseye gun. It takes them about six months to realize it was a mistake. As I said, I see it all the time.  I fell for the generic 45 when I got started and it was a mistake. I reasoned that the Kimber Gold Match was adequately accurate, and it was. It just didn't have any of the other qualities that make a good bullseye gun.

2) The price of a used bullseye gun is around $1000 for an older but servicable model.  These are frequently available if you ask at a bullseye league.  They are readily available if you post a want ad on the bullsey l-forum. If you sell it after 2 years it will still be worth around $1000, so no money is lost. If you buy a new custom bullseye gun and need to sell it after a couple of years, you lose maybe $300 to $350, with most of that drop being due to depreciation of the gun from new to used status.  If you bought a new gold cup and decided to sell it after a couple of years, you'd lose at least $200 on it.

3) A dedicated bullseye gun is not like a PPC gun. They have have the slide rail and a red dot sight. They are reliable, extremely accurate, superbly refined, and designed and balanced for suitability to bullseye. Generic guns just aren't. Almost nobody uses a generic 1911 for bullseye. I don't think I've even seen one with just iron sights in three years, except for some centerfire tyros who quickly upgrade to dedicated guns.  Since Ned is 64 and claims his eyesight is not perfect, he needs the red dot. Just the cost of adding a suitable red dot scope to a 1911 is a $250 job. That alone gets the cost of the gold cup into the realm of a custom bullseye gun, but with none of the other tuning that goes into a bullseye gun. 

4) Accuracy and reliability is vital, but shootability is important too. Bullseye guns are designed for their purpose. Using a generic 1911 imposes a severe handicap. I have a Stainless Gold Match that I used for bullseye for a little while. It's a piece of junk compared to any of my three dedicated bullseye 45s. The only thing that keeps it viable for me is that I learned to do a first rate trigger job, changed out some parts, and converted it to a Marvel 22 conversion.

Maybe they improved the metal in the stainless Kimbers since I got mine. Mine has maybe 10,000 rounds through it and the frame shows visible wear. I cleaned and lubed it every 200 rounds or so, using the best lubricants available. My carbon steel guns show virtually no wear and each have many times the rounds through them. My aluminum framed Pardini 45 shows no wear and it has about 15,000 rounds throught it. Clark Custom still won't do a bullseye converson on a stainless gun without adding their costly "slide guide" apparatus to the gun. I think it's because bullseye guns are expected to last from 250,000 to 500,000 rounds before major work is needed.

Nice discussion, by the way.

Safety first

Offline Lloyd Smale

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (32)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18278
Re: 1911 for Bullseye: Basic with mods or "off the shelf"?
« Reply #7 on: February 21, 2007, 09:33:40 AM »
Ill have to consede to your advise. I have shot bullseye and shot it with an open sighted gun against guys with redot equipted top shelf bullseye guns and have done pretty well. They laughed at me at first but didnt laugh long. Probably because i shoot a hundred  times more rounds a year then probably any two of them put together.  All there high tech guns and they dont realize you still have to be able to shoot one. Ive stuck with what ive got just because i kind of get a kick out of beating a couple of them with there fancy guns. Heck ive been even known to shoot a round with a da wheelgun. If a guy wants to get real serious about competeing your probably right. I guess my advise was more toward someone that want a more versitle gun that could be used for more then just bullseye shooting and still be able to give a fair showing at a range if you knew how to shoot it. Theres no doubt in my mind that a guy would probably do better with a rig like you have. But then i wouldnt have an excuse for losing!!
Lloyd:

There's a difference between bullseye and PPC. Here are the details of why I can't recommend spending money on a generic 1911 (like the gold cup) and a dedicated bullseye gun:

1) By the time a bullseye shooter buys a 45, he already knows he likes the game. They typically start with a generic 22 then realize they need one with a good trigger and a red dot scope. That's where they lose money-- by buying a generic 22 first, then upgrading to a bullseye 22.  Some go on to compound the mistake by buying a generic 45 thinking that it will serve as a bullseye gun. It takes them about six months to realize it was a mistake. As I said, I see it all the time.  I fell for the generic 45 when I got started and it was a mistake. I reasoned that the Kimber Gold Match was adequately accurate, and it was. It just didn't have any of the other qualities that make a good bullseye gun.

2) The price of a used bullseye gun is around $1000 for an older but servicable model.  These are frequently available if you ask at a bullseye league.  They are readily available if you post a want ad on the bullsey l-forum. If you sell it after 2 years it will still be worth around $1000, so no money is lost. If you buy a new custom bullseye gun and need to sell it after a couple of years, you lose maybe $300 to $350, with most of that drop being due to depreciation of the gun from new to used status.  If you bought a new gold cup and decided to sell it after a couple of years, you'd lose at least $200 on it.

3) A dedicated bullseye gun is not like a PPC gun. They have have the slide rail and a red dot sight. They are reliable, extremely accurate, superbly refined, and designed and balanced for suitability to bullseye. Generic guns just aren't. Almost nobody uses a generic 1911 for bullseye. I don't think I've even seen one with just iron sights in three years, except for some centerfire tyros who quickly upgrade to dedicated guns.  Since Ned is 64 and claims his eyesight is not perfect, he needs the red dot. Just the cost of adding a suitable red dot scope to a 1911 is a $250 job. That alone gets the cost of the gold cup into the realm of a custom bullseye gun, but with none of the other tuning that goes into a bullseye gun. 

4) Accuracy and reliability is vital, but shootability is important too. Bullseye guns are designed for their purpose. Using a generic 1911 imposes a severe handicap. I have a Stainless Gold Match that I used for bullseye for a little while. It's a piece of junk compared to any of my three dedicated bullseye 45s. The only thing that keeps it viable for me is that I learned to do a first rate trigger job, changed out some parts, and converted it to a Marvel 22 conversion.

Maybe they improved the metal in the stainless Kimbers since I got mine. Mine has maybe 10,000 rounds through it and the frame shows visible wear. I cleaned and lubed it every 200 rounds or so, using the best lubricants available. My carbon steel guns show virtually no wear and each have many times the rounds through them. My aluminum framed Pardini 45 shows no wear and it has about 15,000 rounds throught it. Clark Custom still won't do a bullseye converson on a stainless gun without adding their costly "slide guide" apparatus to the gun. I think it's because bullseye guns are expected to last from 250,000 to 500,000 rounds before major work is needed.

Nice discussion, by the way.


blue lives matter

Offline Questor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7075
Re: 1911 for Bullseye: Basic with mods or "off the shelf"?
« Reply #8 on: February 21, 2007, 12:10:23 PM »
Lloyd:

I wasn't trying to be bull-headed about it. I'm just calling it as I see it. Bullseye is my game of choice and it has been for several years, so I have a statistical understanding of how people actually end up buying equipment. There's a definite pattern. I've talked to other guys who have been shooting bullseye a lot longer than I have, and have travelled wider for bullseye shooting, and are more accomplished than I am. These guys say the same thing.

The most concise advise I have heard came from one of the high masters that was commenting on purchasing mistakes. He said, and I come as close to quoting as I can,  "If only people would come to a match and see what people are using, then buy that. It would save them a lot of time, trouble, and money." As one of the people who learned the hard way, I have to agree. I spent too much by trying to cut corners.

You're probably right about the fact that you probably shoot many times more than a bullseye shooter. I like the game instead of action shooting specifically because I don't need to burn as much ammo and because there are good leagues established in my area. I'd be just as happy with it if there was only a slow fire component.
Safety first

Offline S.B.

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3953
  • Gender: Male
Re: 1911 for Bullseye: Basic with mods or "off the shelf"?
« Reply #9 on: February 27, 2007, 06:37:17 PM »
I think it would be cheaper to hunt for a Clark, Giles or one of the many guns made by quality gunsmiths from the 1950-1960s? They're out there, you just have to be patient and look.
"The Original Point and Click Interface was a Smith & Wesson."
Life member of NRA, USPSA,ISRA
AF&AM #294
LIUNA #996 for the past 34 years/now retired!

Offline Lloyd Smale

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (32)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18278
blue lives matter

Offline Questor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7075
Re: 1911 for Bullseye: Basic with mods or "off the shelf"?
« Reply #11 on: March 01, 2007, 02:17:01 AM »
Pretty, but without the red dot, I would not buy it. The best values are the "traditional" bullseye guns that are built for accuracy, but are cosmetically ugly. I would put a want ad on the bullseye-L forum accessible through www.bullseyepistol.com
Safety first