Author Topic: Very Strange Warning to Congress...! (Read 2558 times)

TM7 · « **on:** February 11, 2007, 05:45:27 AM »

My God!...from the mouth of arch-globalist Brzezinski--he warns of false flag operation to engage U.S. against Iran. Does this mean the CFR, etc. [along with arch GOP Congressman] has split and abandoned fastrack global Bush and cabinet? Of course, probably few in Congress are listening just like the American public.
.
Brzezinski among other things says: 'If the United States continues to be bogged down in a protracted bloody involvement in Iraq, the final destination on this downhill track is likely to be a head-on conflict with Iran and with much of the world of Islam at large. A plausible scenario for a military collision with Iran involves Iraqi failure to meet the benchmarks; followed by accusations of Iranian responsibility for the failure; then by some provocation in Iraq or a terrorist act in the U.S. blamed on Iran; culminating in a "defensive" U.S. military action against Iran that plunges a lonely America into a spreading and deepening quagmire eventually ranging across Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.'

http://foreign.senate.gov/testimony/2007/BrzezinskiTestimony070201.pdf

......TM7

muskeg13 · « **Reply #1 on:** February 11, 2007, 06:22:44 PM »

Most of us stopped listening to Brzezinski in 1979 when he failed regarding Iran us as Carter's National Security Advisor. We all know how well that episode ended, and not until Reagan took office. Unfortunately, the "downhill track that will likely lead to a head-on conflict with Iran and with much of the world of Islam at large" is probably inevitable. Sooner or later we will have to deal with the radical Islamists, much as earlier Western Europeans had to in pre-Renaissance times. The Moors are back.

ironglow · « **Reply #2 on:** February 12, 2007, 02:41:01 AM »

You said it for me, Muskeg.

magooch · « **Reply #3 on:** February 12, 2007, 02:45:46 AM »

Actually, we can withdraw our forces, disengage from the Mid-east and just wait for the inevitable terrorist attacks on our embassies, etc. and ultimately attacks on our homeland. Then we can treat it all as a law enforcement issue--maybe fire off a couple of cruise missles, take out an aspirin factory--all the prudent things.

I thought there was universal recognition that war has been declared; not so much by us and other countries that have been attacked, but by the muslims. Note that I did not say muslim extremists.

powderman · « **Reply #4 on:** February 12, 2007, 03:14:09 PM »

MAGOOCH. I too see no difference between the so called good, and extremist muslims. The world needs to wake up and see islam for the vile cancer it is, it's a boil on the butt of the entire world. It's time to lance that boil for good. POWDERMAN.

deerslayer79 · « **Reply #5 on:** February 13, 2007, 02:53:16 AM »

a large portion of the american population has sadly lost all aspects of being patriotic.It hurts me a great deal seeing our people followin the footsteps of spokes people/advocates of peace,this means all the actors,singers high populararity types that are speaking against george w and the american military just to heighten thier popularity status,let me tell you that this is total BS(sorry).I believe it is totally crushing that certain groups of people are bashin our people over there trying to surpress the threat of another terrorist type of attack against us again.Yes war are nasty,yes people are going to get killed or wounded but If I was a soilder fighting for the red white and blue, I would be proud to due my duty and If it was my time to go I would not even ponder the fact of resenting any actions that I have taken to save my family/friends from harm being either on a large or small scale,I would go out like a true american,bullets flying,trying to take as many of them jackasses with me I could.I am one of the dwindeling number of people who love this country and if I have to defend this country we call home,believe me I would down to my dyin breath,because NO ONE is goin to harm the people I love beit family or friends,NO ONE!!

magooch · « **Reply #6 on:** February 13, 2007, 03:15:51 AM »

We need to learn from the experience of others who have had to deal with muslims. Take the case of Syria and how they dealt with a certain muslim sect that was causing trouble and were seeking some kind of independence, or something. The Syrian leader, dictator, or whatever he calls himself, warned the people of the town where the problem was coming from that they would be dealt with and if they didn't want to be a part of it, they had better leave. Those who chose to stay and fight, were simply annihilated along with the town that was razed to the ground. Over 25,000 were eliminated and so was the problem.

powderman · « **Reply #7 on:** February 13, 2007, 03:32:10 AM »

MAGOOCH. Thats what should have been done in fallujah and tikrit. POWDERMAN.

Echo4Lima · « **Reply #8 on:** February 21, 2007, 10:41:58 AM »

Just what positions did Ol' Brez hold in the Reagan and Bush admins? Answer that.

Your saying Iran isnt a problem? Your saying the "War Party" in the White House is making it up? Your saying all that Hezbolla, U.S. Iranian Embassy, Lebanon Marine Barracks, support for Muqi Sadr/Shiite Militias, Suicide bomber financing, IED manufacturing, rockets fired from Lebanon, Hiding Mullah Omar, etc, etc, etc, is all made up?

I'm sure glad your around to set us straight.

Echo4Lima · « **Reply #9 on:** March 01, 2007, 01:34:27 PM »

I had thought Brzezinski had only been at a think tank in those days.

Iran has been directly and indirectly involved in global terrorism since they violated international law with the taking of the U S Embassy in 1979. That says they have been a MAJOR problem for 28 years. Its not only the War Party, (not MY phrase) or me, its also the Clinton, Bush #1, Reagan admins, and just about everybody else in the civilized world, that have recognized this.

Remember, it was Carter AND Brzezinski that did such a fine job with Iran. Great international work there eh.......At least Brzz can say he saw the light.

copilot001 · « **Reply #10 on:** March 02, 2007, 04:27:22 AM »

Quote from: Echo4Lima on March 01, 2007, 01:34:27 PM

I had thought Brzezinski had only been at a think tank in those days.

Iran has been directly and indirectly involved in global terrorism since they violated international law with the taking of the U S Embassy in 1979. That says they have been a MAJOR problem for 28 years. Its not only the War Party, (not MY phrase) or me, its also the Clinton, Bush #1, Reagan admins, and just about everybody else in the civilized world, that have recognized this.

Remember, it was Carter AND Brzezinski that did such a fine job with Iran. Great international work there eh.......At least Brzz can say he saw the light.

And the whole Muslim world saw that there were no consequences...Of course they,r not ready to declare outright war on the western worldyet,so they just finance and send out their little terror groups.
then they just shrug their shoulders and say "we know nothing" and go about their bussness.
and of course in our western legal system they get away with this...It,s what they,r counting on.
The knives are out...they have been stuck in our back...and all we do is warn them they shouldn,t run with knives in their hands...they might hurt someone.
One day we will wake up and realise we,r in an undeclared war....I hope it won,t be too late $:-\$

Echo4Lima · « **Reply #11 on:** March 02, 2007, 06:29:20 AM »

Excelent point Copilot!! No matter how much some want to declare that Iran "isnt the problem the the' War party' says it is" Iran IS a major part of the problem.

There is credible information about Hezbola cells already here in the U.S.. Hezbola has paid $2000.00-$5000.00 each for "Coyotes" to smuggle them in. This may be how Iran plans to retaliate if we strike thier Nuke programs.

I believe the "Global war on terror" will make AMERICA safe! Something wrong with that?? America being safe from TERRORISTS??

North Africa, Italy, Normandy, Tarawa, Iwo Jima, Okinawa, those were battles in ONE war. Iraq is a battle in ONE war!! You cant see that because YOU DONT WANT TO!! "Its Bush' war". "Saddam didnt do it, BLAH, BLAH, BLAH".... As if the left is not capable of long term logical thought.

Gurn · « **Reply #12 on:** March 02, 2007, 08:02:29 PM »

MAN!!

I'd better start staying up all night reading the internet boards, order some new foil for my head and get some new binocs to check out the black copters and Bush built UFOs!!!!!!!

Did you know that the planes that hit the towers were copies of Air Force One and were just painted over to look like regular jets!!! And it just so happens that all the passengers were people who found out about the stuff Bush and his buddies were doing at the Scull and Cross Bone meetings!!!!
Believe It Or Not!!

Echo4Lima · « **Reply #13 on:** March 06, 2007, 10:24:36 AM »

Gurn.....you didnt know the WTC was all about raiding Iraqi oil? The hurricanes in Florida were practice runs 'till "they" could figure out how to run them into the Gulf giving us Katrina, so "they" would have a better reason to drill in ANWAR?

You knew about the Skull & Crossbones meeting too....

powderman · « **Reply #14 on:** March 06, 2007, 05:10:28 PM »

TM7. You seem to be under the impression that president Bush started the war against the Godless ones, he didn't. We are in a war, like it or not. Good vs evil, God vs satan. This war was started by a group of Godless, subhuman, SOBS, screaming allah akhbar as they flew planes into buildings and murdered 3,000 innocent Americans. Iran is in this up to their eyeballs. How can you make some of the statements that you do??? The world knows that iran is involved, why can't you see that??? They are very much a part of the evil over there, syria is involved too, and I believe that they received saddams wmds and hid them before we invaded. Aerial photos backed that up. I'm going to bed, been a long day. POWDEREMAN.

Gurn · « **Reply #15 on:** March 06, 2007, 09:56:34 PM »

murdered 3,000 innocent Americans?

??

Really? I dont care about that!! All I know is I hate Bush, so I will block all that out. How dare you bring that up!! The News don't bring it up!! Hollywood don't, The Dems dont either!!!! Whats wrong with You!!!! You need to watch TV and set up all night on the internet in order to properly be trained!!! If you can still see, think for yourself, and are not blinded by fustration and hate, you have a long way to go!!!!

powderman · « **Reply #16 on:** March 07, 2007, 03:18:06 AM »

If you say you support the troops, then whine, complain, and criticize the job they do, you are supporting the wrong troops, theirs, not ours. Don't kid yourself.

powderman · « **Reply #17 on:** March 07, 2007, 03:21:37 PM »

TM7. Evidently you think I was meaning only you, not true. I meant no disrespect, and am sorry you felt that I meant it that way. The constant back stabbibing, and whining by the dumcrap party is the main thing that has killed so many of our brave soldiers. They give hope to our enemies, and strengthen their resolve to fight on. Dissent is one thing, total disrespect and back stabbing borders on treason, thats what the dumcraps are doing. They are destroying the morale of our troops daily. Our soldiers know that the dumcrap party has no respect for them and is doing everything they can to help the Godless ones win no matter what happens to them, or our nation. The dumcraps want power, pure and simple, total control of our lives, and they don't care what they have to do to get it. News showed obama and hilary in Alabama yesterday, practicing their good old boy southern drawl, it didn't work. What I'm trying to say is that if this nation would pull together instead of in fighting we could WIN this war. Again Sir, I meant no disrespect. POWDERMAN.

Gurn · « **Reply #18 on:** March 07, 2007, 07:55:45 PM »

Calm down...obfuscating and derision simply can not hide truth.

Boy do we agree on that!!!!

To tell the truth, no disrespect intended. I could give a flying %#$% what you, Bush, Kerry, or any other person setting on there tail in their nice warm house has to think about our mission over there. If most the boys and girls over there risking there lives think there mission is a good one, then I'm all for it! Who am I to spout off my mouth and tell them, or the families of thoses who gave their life, their doing the wrong thing, or there mission is less than honorable. This whole deal of arm chair foriegn policy makers and internet generals makes me, and I'm sure a whole lot of these young heros puke.

Gurn · « **Reply #19 on:** March 08, 2007, 04:44:48 AM »

Imagine what Mao, Stalin, and any other despots could do with citizens having the above attitude.....all falling in line, believing all propaganda

I think we agree on that.

The problem with your thinking is. Unlike those of the past. The boys and girls over there today, have access to all the propaganda you or I have. They also have information most of us dont. Real deal everyday information of what is, and is not going on. No not from the news or the internet, while they sit at there key board, but from real life. If you think you are more informed on this mission then they are, your wrong. They can digest the propaganda and compare it to the real deal.
Your comparisons don't hold water. With this in mind, reread my previous stament.

powderman · « **Reply #20 on:** March 08, 2007, 04:38:34 PM »

We send boxes of goodies to soldiers every month. The feedback we get is that they believe in the job they are doing and are deeply hurt hearing all the crappola spewed by the dumcraps. They don't understand why the media never covers or talks about all of the good they do. This so called dissent hurts their morale, makes them think that America doesn't care, at least the dumcraps. The dims are the best friends that the Godless ones have. POWDERMAN.

kenjs1 · « **Reply #21 on:** March 14, 2007, 07:13:36 AM »

A Dallas morning radio show host named Jeff Bolton spent last week broadcasting from all over Iraq. Some Iraqi's were afraid to appear on camera and others were anxious to do so. Overwhelmingly theses people were very pro American. They wanted to thank our soldiers (us) and say life will be better post-Saddam. These reports, and those from another reporter Pamela Hess ( look her interviews up if you have not seen them - very good, insightful and obviously heartfelt) give a more accurate assessment of the situation. One can sense the honesty in these reports. The message is that the mission has changed. This morning Bolton recapped and reiterated what I had listened to last week. The soldiers there were proud of the job they had done and were upset at the media here. The main stream reporters are said to stay in the green zone and do not venture into country much. They were described as some of the most cynical and downright miserable people ever met. Right now it appears to me that Iraq is at a crossroads. I know that sounds like I state he bleeding obvious but it is important to keep that in mind. It is still entirely possible to effectively direct the outcome. Yes we have rebuilt infrastructure and schools and done other good works - we have also waged war on their soil. That would be hard for any American to swallow. They would all like us to leave as soon as it it safe for them. I imagine safe would be when none are afraid of the camera! The next months will really see if it was worth it or not. It will depend on if we make it worth it or not - don' you think ? The difference now is that many serviceman have been there for a long while. The Iraqi people are are no longer strangers to them. Our people are learning more of the language and nuances of their customs and it is becoming apparent that a friendships have developed . Whether or not our servicemen and women would feel betrayed if a timetable was mandated for their withdrawal I think is second to them in feeling they would be abandoning their new allies were the made to leave too soon.

Echo4Lima · « **Reply #22 on:** April 02, 2007, 11:18:08 AM »

A young Marine recently returned from Iraq said he didn't know we were loosing 'till he got home.

The most accurate reporting here and in Iraq is on the radio and the blogs. The troops get a lot of information. More than any other war. That's probably why the (not so) "Fairness Doctrine" is being brought up again.

60%+ of the Military enlisted AFTER the Iraq invasion. Its an ALL VOLUNTEER force. Oh shoot!! I forgot!! Its only made up of under educated, the poor, the tricked, and all that! I remember now, Kerry told us about that!!

When the point is repeatedly made to the constant harangue of negativity, ridicule and mockery is all that's left.

deltecs · « **Reply #23 on:** April 14, 2007, 12:22:24 PM »

Quote from: magooch on February 13, 2007, 03:15:51 AM

We need to learn from the experience of others who have had to deal with muslims. Take the case of Syria and how they dealt with a certain muslim sect that was causing trouble and were seeking some kind of independence, or something. The Syrian leader, dictator, or whatever he calls himself, warned the people of the town where the problem was coming from that they would be dealt with and if they didn't want to be a part of it, they had better leave. Those who chose to stay and fight, were simply annihilated along with the town that was razed to the ground. Over 25,000 were eliminated and so was the problem.

Wow, didn't the Iraqi's hang Hussein for just the same reason. Murder and crimes against humanity are reasons for execution. Of Anyone. Killing off a whole community for actions of some of its members is a crime against humanity. It happened in Czechoslovakia with Heydrich and it was and is still an atrocity. I'm not a pacifist, and wholeheartedly support our troops. I agree that terrorism of any kind is action that qualifies for execution. When extremists, whether religious, political, commercial, or militant, rampage to force their ideals on the rest of society, it is time for The World Governments to act decisively by not only denouncing the atrocity but actively seek out and eliminate this danger. No exception. The world is too small a place with today's technology that no one is safe anywhere when terrorism and its cowardly head appears. I call them cowards and spies since they refuse to be recognized by uniforms or manifesto. None in my opinion rate any protection from the Geneva Convention as combatants. The war is against religious hardliners. They will not quit. Their goal is to convert all infidels to the faith and subservient to its doctrine. This is a war but not against a political entity. Make no mistake that if we stop now, we will reap the 4 horse men's vengence for decades. If you don't believe it, just look at the disasters of the last 50 years and notice how the lack of respect for the American people as a Nation has increased. Let's not have another or we'll be tripping over each other to and from the cemetery on our own soil.

magooch · « **Reply #24 on:** April 15, 2007, 04:01:21 AM »

No worries fellas, Nancy Pilosi has reported for duty and is handling it. There, is that sarcastic enough for ya TM?

deltecs · « **Reply #25 on:** April 15, 2007, 09:18:34 AM »

Quote from: TM7 on April 15, 2007, 07:29:09 AM

[Deltecs....that is all well and fine, providing what you based your conclusions on is actually true. But who made the USA world policeman...? I think you answered your own question why the USA is now held in less reguard than ever. Most countries don't want globalism as promoted by the West, and that is why they are closely watching the outcome of this ME conflict and what happens to the dollar. Meanwhile, announced a while back and featured on mnsbc just today, every kingdom in the region now wants nuclear based power systems..!! Me, I'm going to follow Halliburton and get some funds in Euro's.

....TM7

I try to get the correct concept across when I write but it obviously came across the wrong way. I was attempting to convey the need for all governments everywhere is the world to endorse war on terrorism. It is up to the more powerful nations to convince the others that under no circumstances will the rest of the world tolerate terrorism or any government that aids or protects such actions. It was not a reference to World Unity or globalism. It is my observation and reasoning conclusion that if this doesn't happen, then no government can survive and anarchy will prevail. This condition eventually must be resolved and mankinds solution to these has been world wars. If we can prevent that I think we'd be a lot better off.

powderman · « **Reply #26 on:** April 15, 2007, 12:21:58 PM »

Pelosi will use her position to undermine every gain GW has made in the war, she wants to negotiate a date for US to surrender to the Godless ones. She, like the rest of the dumcraps, care only about power. They don't give a hoot about you, or me, or America, only total control and power. They are wanting to withhold funding for the very ammo our soldiers need to fight these Godless, subhuman scum. No money means, no food, gas, ammo, etc. Kinda like sticking a knife in the back of every American soldier. She should be in jail, and those that agree with her. POWDERMAN.

Echo4Lima · « **Reply #27 on:** April 18, 2007, 05:46:21 AM »

The Iraq study group isn't! It's the "surrender group", just like the Dem's are surrender monkeys.

The left sold us out at the end of Viet Nam and they are attempting to sell us out again.

Why are they so intent on loosing? Is their hatred for Bush so deep they are willing to surrender to the terrorists and insurgents to prove Bush was wrong?

What Hanoi Jane did in Nam was treason. Pelosi is coming pretty darn close...

Tokyo Rose. Hanoi Jane. Damascus Nancy?