the intent of the law, according to the emails from the representative that sponsored it, is to allow smokeless powder hunting in any situation where black powder is legal.
therefore, yes, if it passes, though it may be re-worded to be more explicit, you will be able to hunt with smokeless powder STATEWIDE, not just the shotgun zone, during general firearms and muzzleloading season.
busta -
i emailed a LT CO that i had contacted a couple of years ago. he retired this year, but he informed me that it was perfectly legal to use smokeless powder in muzzleloaders, in the shotgun zone, during general firearms season.
simonkenton -
yes, powder enforcement is an undue burden on the CO's. while no one advocates willingly breaking the law, i suspect should a case like this come to court, the DNR would have a difficult time backing their argument.
- black powder substitutes are currently legal.
- common black powder subs (777, pyro, etc) bear no resemblance, chemically, to black powder.
- common black powder subs produce far more energy than black powder (15-20% more, by volume). that point is often ignored.
- common black powder subs are classified by the department of transportation as smokeless.
- the only similarity between black powder and subs is that both can be measured by volume. then again, so can my double base nitrocellulose smokeless AA5744. though, most smokeless powders are more reliably measured by weight.
given there's no "definition" for what makes a black powder sub, i hardly think the law is enforceable in the current context. though, i'm quite certain one would get a ticket for hunting with smokeless during muzzleloading season right now, i just don't think the ticket would stand if someone challenged it.