Author Topic: COL question  (Read 335 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dusty Miller

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2271
  • Gender: Male
COL question
« on: April 13, 2007, 04:32:47 PM »
My Speer reloading manual sez the COL for the 25-06 cartridge is 3.250".  However, when I chamber a dummy round into my T/C Encore it comes out 3.160".  How much of a problem is this going to be in terms of increased pressure?  Any suggestions?
When seconds mean life or death, the police are only minutes away!

Offline 41 mag

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 254
    • My Pictures
Re: COL question
« Reply #1 on: April 14, 2007, 01:55:00 AM »
Depending on your load it could mean a significant increase. I would back off at least .010" from your reading and go from there.

The 3.250" length is a standard, but not etched in stone.

One thing to remember is that the Encore is not a bolt action. It might be great for factory load replications, but it might not handle much more pressure than that. You will most likly find your best accuracy / velocity combo, somewhere between .010 and .030" off th lands.

Offline Dusty Miller

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2271
  • Gender: Male
Re: COL question
« Reply #2 on: April 14, 2007, 05:31:51 AM »
Thank you 41 mag, I'll start off backing down .030 and see what happens, I appreciate the inpu. 
When seconds mean life or death, the police are only minutes away!

Offline PaulS

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1120
Re: COL question
« Reply #3 on: April 17, 2007, 05:45:58 AM »
The Speer manual uses that o/all length in their testing. If you are going to use a shorter o/all length then you need to reduce your charge and work up. This is more true for powders that come close to filling the available powder space but it is true for all the charges. It really is true that if you change any specification or component in a given load you should back off 10% and work your load up.
With straight wall cases it is easier to approximate the necessary reduction by taking the specified load and reduce it the same percentage that the volume is reduced with the deeper seated bullet. That gets complicated when using a bottle-neck case but it can still be done. In the long run it is just quicker and safer to drop the load 10% and work your way up to find where your accuracy is best.
PaulS

Hodgdon, Lyman, Speer, Sierra, Hornady = reliable resources
so and so's pages on the internet = not reliable resources
Alway check loads you find on the internet against manuals.
NEVER exceed maximum listed loads.

Offline Dusty Miller

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2271
  • Gender: Male
Re: COL question
« Reply #4 on: April 17, 2007, 03:17:00 PM »
That's good info Paul, thank you.
When seconds mean life or death, the police are only minutes away!