Gentlemen,
I think each of you has a very valid point, especially Huntsman and his advice to get outdoors and make your own adventures come true. But that having been said lets look at TV hunting and fishing shows a minute.
I have been involved filming shows with various production companies for about 8 years now. We have filmed in Canada, Mexico, Hawaii, New Zealand, various locations in Africa, Asia and Europe as well as all over the US. Now this may sound like a glamorous job to some, but lets not forget the key phrase here, job. That is exactly what these shows are; and most publications, both hardcopy and online. They are money making ventures for the production companies, on air hosts, cameramen, video editors, writers, publishers, investment firms and of course the sponsors. Dont think for one minute that the Outdoor Channel, TNN, Outdoor Life Network, the Sportsmans Channel or any other TV, radio, online or printed venue would be in existence today if the people behind it werent making enough to compell them to continue doing so. So yes most of these shows take on the appearance of infomercials because that is how these guys make their money. And this is why most hardcopy publications only publish positive reviews of their sponsors products or lodges that have hosted their writers. After all if they dont push their sponsors products then they wont have any sponsors, then who would pay their salaries? And what hunting lodge, preserve or ranch is going to give a(n) animals(s) toward the effort of filming a show unless they are going to get advertisement out of it. None that I know of!
One of the reasons that so many of these guys go to high fenced operations, exclusive hunting lodges or exotic locals that most of us will never be able to afford is because these places can more or less guarantee them an animal. After all what would a hunting show be if those hosting the segments never harvested an animal or caught their fish? It would be pretty boring and they wouldnt be able to hang on to their sponsors now would they? Is this the real world that the other 98% of us experience? Of course not, but then I havent met a producer yet that promised me realistic or average hunts. Why do they do this, once again, money. No animal equals no show equals no sponsors equals no money.
But just what is involved in the cost of producing a show? Lets take a look at a worst case scenario of a trip to Africa, and this is not a comprehensive list;
Salary of the cameramen, often as much as $750.00 per day while filming and $350.00 a day while traveling..Usually 2 Cameramen on each trip
Camera Equipment could be as high as $75,000.00 per camera to purchase
Film/video cassettes usually around $10-15 a cassette - usually around 15-20 cassettes per trip - this can be as much as $300.00 per trip
Transportation costs to filming local to Africa can be as much as $2,500.00 each. A production company usually has at least 5 along on each trip. = $12,500.00
Licenses for hunters could be as much as $750.00 per hunter, 2 hunters = $1,500.00
Work Permits varies by country but will average $350.00/each; 5 on the trip = $1,750.00
Lodging/Meals are usually provided at the filming location but not always. Pre-trip and Post trip expenses are covered by production company; 5 people at an average of $250.00 = $1,250.00
Game Export fees various by animal. Each trip I have been on we took at least 6 animals each at an average of $650.00. So 6 animals would equal $3,900.00 times 2 hunters = $7,800.00.
Post trip editing costs can run as much as $25,000.00 per segment.
Therefore, our 10 day hunting trip would cost the production company, somewhere in the neighborhood of $70,000.00.
Then while on the trip they will usually film 20 to 40 hours of footage that is edited down to 13 to 18 minutes of air time on a 30 minute segment. The rest of the time is reserved for airing the sponsors commercials in effort to obtain the funding so they can film another segement.
Yes folks this is a business. Now I am not saying that a local trip to film a whitetail or feral hog hunt would run that much, but most of the costs are still there in proportion to the trip taken. With that in mind a production company could very easily spend $750,000.00 to $1,000,000.00 to product thirty six 30 minute segments, depending upon the quality of the show they produce. This is why so many of these venues are becoming commercialized. They have to in order to survive. It is a pure example of mathmatics. You musthave more money thanyou spent to make a profit.
I am not trying to justify why some of these shows seem to be boring as hell or the production quality is below par, just trying to shed some light on what is involved in getting a segment aired and why they are filmed like they are.
Besides if you dont like the shows you are seeing on the Outdoor Channel let Jake Hartwick, VP of marketing, or Andy Dale, President, know. Theyll listen because they are always striving to improve the channel but they wont know how you feel if you dont tell them.