Well I've given this some time to sit, so as to avoid being labeled as some type of bad moderator... I've also decided you must be right. Clearly shooting at a flying turkey is unethical. Obviously. There is no question that while I may be completely comfortable with the shot, and I might attest that it's both fun and lethal, what do I know? After all, I've done it, and you apparently haven't. I could suggest that perhaps someone who wants to know if it's ethical or not should try it for themselves and see if they believe that a turkey can be safely and effectively dispatched while flying, but...
So on the eve of the Kansas and Missouri duck seasons I've decided to start a new movement. I'm going to call it the, "Shooting flying targets is unethical" movement. I intend to only shoot ducks and geese (a goose is almost identical in size to the turkeys that can't be killed flying) on the water. In addition I'm going to have to discover a way in which I can kill pheasants while they are not only on the ground, but standing still. Doves can be killed in trees, but what about quail? There can be no debate that holding out for stationary headshots at close range is more lethal, more reliable, and less likely to wound. As such I've decided that it must be the only ethical way to hunt. Any pheasant hunter in the world knows that losing roosters to butt-shots is a common happening (unless you only hunt tame pheasants) and certainly I can't count the number of crippled ducks I see each year from unethical wingshooters. I clean ducks, geese, and pheasants every year with old pellets in them. That these birds were still flying around appearing healthy should be ignored to further incite our rage. Why haven't these guys read the NWTF guidelines?
I've compared this horrible style of fall turkey hunting to pheasant hunting in the past. In a lot ways it is very similar. The birds are tough, shot selection and blocker safety is important, and the action can be pretty intense. They're often spread out in a given woodlot, much as pheasants would be in a given strip of grass. I've also said, with regard to the shooting, that it's not as hard as people would lead you to believe. Flying turkeys never get very high, they also fly almost perfectly straight with the head and neck stretched out. They are slow to take flight, and make lots of noise in doing so. In my opinion the head is bigger than a dove, and far easier to hit. Hitting that head kills the turkeys dead. There is no question it's easier than killing a giant Canada. Of course, what do I know? After all, I've only done it both ways and am offering an informed opinion. Perhaps if I just read more people's opinions about something rather than actually doing it, I would be better off? Maybe I should read all those letters to the editor of Turkey Hunting that followed the article "To Bushwhack or Not?". The self righteous tone in some of those letters reminds me of someone, I... Just... Can't... Place... It... So much for that, "hunters need to stick together" stuff, right?
The only thing you said that I agree with is that people should be free to hunt, as long as it's legal, however they want (free legally, or free of traditionalists' brow beating?). I don't particularly enjoy traditional fall turkey hunting. I think it's boring, stupid, and relatively easy. I've killed several turkeys that way, and it's just not for me. I'd rather duck, goose, pheasant, quail, elk, bow, or rifle hunt. I see fall turkey hunting as a target of opportunity. Often it happens during a quail hunt, sometimes during a bowhunt. Sometimes just an evening scouting. What follows is usually a short, fun, shoot that fills some fall turkey tags.
In a lot of ways I'm lucky to have the opportunities that I do. I grew up not only hunting, but hunting great places, and being taught by great hunters. I see hunters every year that are disasters. Terrible shots, terrible callers, setup all wrong, cheap gear, you name it. But in a time when hunter numbers are declining I don't see any place for insulting those people. If they're having fun in a safe, legal, manner, why should I discourage them? They're out there givin' it hell, instead of sitting on the couch getting fat. I commend them for that.
I gave my advice to someone who asked about it. I think it's good, safe, ethical advice that will produce results. I welcome anyone who's curious to try it, and should they decide it's unethical they can choose a different way of hunting. I won't judge them on their conclusion (or their login name).