Nutty Demoncrats are at it again in WI

[jh45gun]

Bill Seeks to Make Animal Abuse Equal to Domestic Abuse in Wisconsin 
 
Thursday, September 20, 2007
 
Senate Bill 162, introduced by State Senators Fred Risser (D-26), Tim Carpenter (D-3), and Julie Lassa (D-24) would make “harm or threat of harm” to an animal a form of domestic abuse.  In Wisconsin, being charged with domestic abuse means losing the ability to purchase or possess firearms. 



The absurdity of SB 162 is that it not only equates animals to humans, but also does not define what “harm or threat of harm” is.  Animal “rights” extremists could argue that the training of hunting dogs or everyday treatment of dairy cattle constitutes abuse.  A restraining order filed against you for common activities involving an animal will result in loss of your Second Amendment rights and a violation could put domestic abuse charges on your record.

Please contact the members of the Senate Committee of Judiciary and Corrections and respectfully urge them to vote against SB 162 when the time comes.

State Senate Lena Taylor (D-4), Chair
(608) 266-5810
Sen.Taylor@legis.wisconsin.gov 

State Senator Jim Sullivan (D-5), Vice-Chair
(608) 266-2512 or (866) 817-6061
Sen.Sullivan@legis.wisconsin.gov

State Senator Glen Grothman (R-20)
(608) 266-7513 or (800) 662-1227
Sen.Grothman@legis.wisconsin.gov

State Senator Mary Lazich (R-28)
(608) 266-5400 or (800) 334-1442
Sen.Lazich@legis.wisconsin.gov

State Senator Kathleen Vinehout (D-31)
(608) 266-8546 or (877) 763-6636
Sen.Vinehout@legis.wisconsin.gov 

 
 

[379 Peterbilt]

Here is the proposed bill strait from the Wisconsin legislature webpage

http://www.legis.state.wi.us/2007/data/SB-162.pdf

The write-up, as currently written, is quite vauge to me. In my opinion, it was probably purposely submited that way so as to mislead the people who really want to know exactly what the intentions of this bill entail, while catering to the real threatening radical groups of this country - PETA & HSUS. I also think that typical suburban housewife types will be happy with simpley scanning the bill headlines on this and feel secure, without ever digging into it further. Symbolism over substance seems to be the prevailing trend these days. The proposed bill, if passed, likely won't do dick for anyones quality of life, but by GOD there are a few leftists whackos out there who will *feel* better.

To me, this bill was submited as if there is a problem out there with guys kicking and beating their dogs. Safe bet is nothing could be further from the truth. However, this proposed legislation is aimed toward taking one of the many needed baby steps to humanize animals and criminalize (white heteralsexual males who hunt) humans. If I have the liberal leftists and their WHACKO supporters pegged correctly, this bills intentions are aimed at making a criminal out of any animal owner who scolds or disciplines their pet.

In coming years, it would not surprise me one bit if the leftist WHACKOS submited legislation with the intent of supporting manditory assigned animal psycologists to interview potential and/or existing pet & animal owners.

I might otherwise give this proposed bill more credit, but anything introduced by Fred Risser and company automaticaly raises red flags. That damned "D" behind their name gives it away. As of late, Democrats seem to want to pass legislation that is contrary to human nature and the values that made this country great over the last 200+ years

I saw on the HSUS webpage that they support this SB 162. That should tell you all you need to know.