Author Topic: Hunting finish  (Read 1073 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dougk

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1937
  • Driftwood TEXAS
Hunting finish
« on: October 31, 2007, 04:36:41 PM »
What finish is better for hunting, Blue or Stainless?

Thanks
Doug

Offline corbanzo

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2405
Re: Hunting finish
« Reply #1 on: October 31, 2007, 05:23:22 PM »
Chrome stainless can reflect light.  Flat or brushed stainless isn't quite so bad.  Really, the gun isn't a large enough outline to make a major difference, and easily concealed in branches.  But blued would be harder to spot in any light, because stainless, even flat will still reflect more light, blued absorbs all colors(mostly) of the spectrum.

Stainless won't rub off and it won't rust.

I'd say if you take care of your gun, and watch yourself it's up to you, and I would say there really isn't much difference.  I know people who have only blued, and I know people who have only stainless, they are just as successful as eachother.  With a handgun you can shoot 50+ yards away pretty easy if you want to.  No animal is going to spot anything as small as a handgun at that distance unless you are waving it around all crazy. 
"At least with a gun that big, if you miss and hit the rocks in front of him it'll stone him to death..."

Offline S.B.

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3953
  • Gender: Male
Re: Hunting finish
« Reply #2 on: October 31, 2007, 05:24:58 PM »
Undeniably, stainless is more durable in any kind of inclement weather.
"The Original Point and Click Interface was a Smith & Wesson."
Life member of NRA, USPSA,ISRA
AF&AM #294
LIUNA #996 for the past 34 years/now retired!

Offline Graybeard

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (69)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 27008
  • Gender: Male
Re: Hunting finish
« Reply #3 on: November 01, 2007, 06:32:03 AM »
That a blued gun reflects less light than a SS one is a common MISCONCEPTION and is false. The apparent color of the finish has ZERO to do with it's reflectivity. If no sun light hits it I'm not sure I'd say blue is less easy to pick out either at least where I hunt as gray is a very common color for limbs and trunks of trees here. But almost all blued guns are highly polished and reflect the maximum about of light. Most of my SS guns have a duller matte finish and will reflect far less than than any of my blued guns.

Many times sitting high in a tree stand I've seen the bright glare of light from a hunter's blued gun as he walked thru the woods within sight of me. Who started the story that blued guns reflect less than SS is beyond me but it's another of those myths that seems to never die.


Bill aka the Graybeard
President, Graybeard Outdoor Enterprises
256-435-1125

I am not a lawyer and do not give legal advice.

Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life anyone who believes in Him will have everlasting life!

Offline kennisondan

  • Trade Count: (7)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 739
Re: Hunting finish
« Reply #4 on: November 01, 2007, 07:21:15 AM »
a scope is the biggest shine out there.. I agree it is the shiny finish that is the biggest problem, and that any dull finish is better... one of my clements guns has a dull black finish, and it does not shine at all... looks dull in any light but still attractive... I just stay in the shadows as much as possible and pay attention to the light reflecting off the surfaces of the gun, a watch, and MY GLASSES...
all that is important to me...
dk

Offline obxmike

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55
Re: Hunting finish
« Reply #5 on: November 02, 2007, 10:30:52 AM »
I've always leaned to stainless just because it's easier to keep. I hate being out with a blued gun and getting it wet......You can just about hear it start to rust before you can get home and dry it off properly.  I am in agreement with GB on the reflectivity thing....matte stainless is much less reflective than blued. As a side note, you can wrap either finish with that non-reflective camo tape and pick any color you want to go underneath!

Offline HHI-7420

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 204
Re: Hunting finish
« Reply #6 on: November 12, 2007, 03:38:16 PM »
I use both bright blue and stainless(ruger finish) and I average 4 deer a year. I've shot them as close as 4-5 yds.(maybe closer). What matters most is your movement. Bring your gun up very slowly close to your body , then slowly extend it and pow! Dead deer.  Pat

Offline kennisondan

  • Trade Count: (7)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 739
Re: Hunting finish
« Reply #7 on: November 13, 2007, 01:40:08 PM »
yep ... Pow....
not pow pow either.   :D
dk

Offline Redhawk1

  • Life time NRA Supporter.
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (78)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10748
  • Gender: Male
Re: Hunting finish
« Reply #8 on: November 15, 2007, 01:07:55 AM »
I really don't think it matters which one you choose, a handgun is not like a mirror. Next time your out hunting, look for hunters, the last thing you will see is there guns, no matter if it is a handgun or rifle. I go with what I like and mostly it is stainless.
If  you're going to make a hole, make it a big one.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you,
Jesus Christ and the American G. I.
One died for your soul, the other for your freedom

Endowment Life Member of the NRA
Life Member NA

Offline banen

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 125
Re: Hunting finish
« Reply #9 on: November 15, 2007, 12:46:24 PM »
I don't think it matters other than stainless is more weather resistant.  Other than that I agree with what Graybeard said.