Author Topic: Ca lead ban  (Read 839 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Saloon slug

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 414
  • Gender: Male
  • Eastern NC
Ca lead ban
« on: December 16, 2007, 04:44:04 PM »
Well it has happened starting July 2008 it will be illegal to even possess lead ammo in Condor country ($1,000 fine for the possession of lead ammo). This includes rim fire and our beloved Patched Round Ball and conicals.
We Californians need to send a message to the DFG that this idiotic. I will not be buying a license or tags for the 2008-2009 season and I will mail a letter explaining why. If we can get every Californian hunter to participate in this boycott it will hit the CA DFG where it hurts (in their pocket book). This ban doesn't just effect CA hunters it effects every gun owner in the state. I know that there are a good many out there that dont give 2 hoots for CA but since this passed AZ is starting to feel the lead ban pressure.

So please ask every CA hunter you know to join me in boycotting the CA DFG for the 2008-2009 season year.
Thank you
From the halls of Montezuma

Offline Semisane

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 569
Re: Ca lead ban
« Reply #1 on: December 16, 2007, 05:44:59 PM »
That's interesting (and scary).  How do they define "Condor country"?  Was the CA DFG instrumental in getting the ban passed? 
CLICK ON ME: .
Link to... highchairstands@cox.net

Offline Buckskins & Black Powder

  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1700
  • Gender: Male
    • Buckskins & Black Powder
Re: Ca lead ban
« Reply #2 on: December 16, 2007, 05:54:01 PM »
I heard something about lead bullets being in gut piles and then the birds eating it.  Why are bullets in the guts? Every hunter i know shoots the animal either right through the shoulder or behind the shoulder resulting is a pass through shot! Lead goes flying out of the animal and into a tree where it stays for life.  Damn californians dont got the brains god gave geese.

Offline Semisane

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 569
Re: Ca lead ban
« Reply #3 on: December 16, 2007, 06:14:26 PM »
A Mind Is A Terrible Thing To Waste! (That's why God didn't give them to liberals.)
CLICK ON ME: .
Link to... highchairstands@cox.net

Offline captchee

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 432
Re: Ca lead ban
« Reply #4 on: December 17, 2007, 02:44:18 AM »
well i spent some time  the end of last week talking to one  of the heads of enforcement for CF&G
As part of a clarification that   our members were asking about .  
 Seems the at least one well known national muzzleloading organization was saying or I should say one of their reps was telling folks  that  that the reporter  who did the above article  was miss informed and that  this rule change did not include muzzleloading weapons .
 So I  put in a call . The first person I spoke to  could not answer my questions but  did tell me that what  was being submitted in the reports was that  their main concern from lead wasn’t the bullet itself but  that at higher velocities , led fragments as it passes through the animal. That the test they were being presented  with were showing the capability of high concentrations of this being left in surrounding tissues .
 That due to the higher velocities now being reached by muzzleloading weapons , those same concerns are being applied  concerning  muzzleloading as well
 
 Then  after being sent to a couple other department sections I finally  talked with the Asst. Chief of enforcement from  the CDF&G   , HQ .
 He was able to answer each of my questions  and even said he would double check and call me back  so as to make 100% sure he was right with what  he was saying . Which he did  , confirming what I had been told
 Here is a copy of   our news release  concerning  some of the questions about this change and its effects  on muzzleloading



Quote
TRADITIONAL MUZZLELOADING ASSOCIATION
INFORMATION RELEASE :
Concerning lead ban information in areas of California

DEC , 14 2007

I just got off the phone with Rob Allen who is the Asst. Chief of enforcement for California fish and game at their HQ
Now he gave me the following answers and said he would call me back once he confirms his answers but as he understands it this is the answers .


Question : does this change due to take effect in July include lead projectiles included in muzzleloading
Answer: yes it includes all projectiles used in pistols , rifles , muzzleloading rifles or solid lead projectiles in shotguns or as used in any of the above

Question : is there any stipulations on lead shot concerning upland game birds that may fall under this regulation
Answer: No not at this time . The use of lead shot is not covered under this change

Question : does the Possession clause cover owning or transporting lead projectiles in or through the restricted area when not use specifically for hunting
Answer: the change only applies to lead projectiles used during while hunting any type of game , be that big game or other . The Possession of any lead projectile capable of being fired from the weapon / weapons you have in your Possession while deemed by the inspecting officer to have an intended use of hunting .

Question : does this change also establish a reason of enforcement for shooting events that take place within the restricted area such as target practice Black powder rendezvous, cowboy action events or other shooting competitions
Answer:
No . these will not be effected . This requirement only covers hunting or those deemed to be hunting

Question : what is or is there the requirement for certification of a projectile to meet the requirements of this restriction . When that projectile is intended to be used for hunting
Answer: currently there is no requirement or field test to certify or confirm a projectile meets the requirement. At this point, the plan is that a person deemed to be hunting with a projectile that is felt by the officer to not be incompliance with the regulation . that person or persons will be required to surrender the projectile OR one of the like projectiles in their possession, which could or is deemed intended to be use withing the firearms in their possession for hunting .
That projectile will be tested at a later date to confirm if it meets the requirements or not . If it fails testing by the laboratory , a citation will be issued for a violation of game laws within that given area .
Right now we have no other way available to ascertain in the feild ,if the projectile is in compliance or not

Ok folks there you have the skinny . Also while I was writing this I received the returned call from Rob Allen confirming these answers .

We will keep you informed of further changes as they are made available or brought to our attention
_________________
_________________
TMA charter member #11 & Co-founder

===============================
Get Informed. Save a Muzzleloader
http://www.traditionalmuzzleloadingassociation.com/index.html

 now as defined , this is what is considered condor country  for right now .  there as we understand it  is  also a push to enlarge this impact area  considerably . However at this time we are being told that  the  expansion of the effected area was not accepted .
 However as you all know that can change at a drop of the hat , so you should keep yourself informed  if  hunt anywhere near this area


Offline One Eye

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 139
  • Gender: Male
Re: Ca lead ban
« Reply #5 on: December 18, 2007, 06:32:45 AM »
With all due respect to the thread author, not buying hunting licenses is exactly what these people want.  If you stop hunting, then you let them win!

Won't be long and you won't be able to drive your 4x4 or SUV hunting or fishing due to "global warming".  What a bunch of clowns.

Dan
"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have." ~ Thomas Jefferson