Author Topic: H&R Revolver Questions  (Read 6479 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cookiemann

  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1749
  • Apple Valley, MN
H&R Revolver Questions
« on: January 23, 2008, 05:26:58 PM »
I have heard they are real accurate and well made.  Do any of you have them?  I have seen pics of them.  They look good, but how do they shoot?   Any comments or facts about them are welcomed.  I want to keep eyes open for one, if they are reliable and good shooters.

Thanks, cookie
NOT ON MY WATCH

"AIM small...MISS small"

Offline 44 Man

  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2419
  • Gender: Male
Re: H&R Revolver Questions
« Reply #1 on: January 24, 2008, 10:09:57 AM »
I have a 999 and love it!  It is among the few guns I would not sell under any circumstances.  But I also had a swing out cylinder .22 H&R.  That was an ok plinker, but the break top 999 is a class act.  I passed on a 4" shortly after I had bought my 6".  I wish I had bought that one too!  If you can find one, buy it.  44 Man

You are never too old to have a happy childhood!

Offline jdinil

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 109
  • Gender: Male
Re: H&R Revolver Questions
« Reply #2 on: January 24, 2008, 11:42:51 AM »
I have a 929 4 inch with swing out cylinder and a model 676 (I think that's the right model number). It has a removeable cylinder for loading and has a interchangeable .22 mag cylinder. It uses a 6 inch barrel. I also had a model 949 at one time. It's basically a "cowboy" styled 929. A relative had a model 999, which I shot quite a bit. All of these revolvers being rimfires. I have no experience with H&R centerfires. None of these guns are close to Smith & Wessons or Rugers, even, in quality. However, they are not bad guns at all. The ones I mentioned would all shoot about a 2 or 3 inch group over a sandbag rest at 20 yards. The 999 was always consider by H&R to be their "premium" revolver. It's probably the best one to look for. Although, I wouldn't turn down a good 929 or 949 at the right price.

Offline mangulator

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 477
Re: H&R Revolver Questions
« Reply #3 on: January 25, 2008, 05:29:18 AM »
I had a 949 back in 1982, loved the gun. The trigger was stiff I had a gun smith lighten the trigger and it shot great. I had to get rid of it when I went through a divorce 18 years ago. Sometimes I think of that gun. Yes they were not the quality of S&W or Ruger but they were not bad guns to have and mine was fairly accurate. If, you find one at a decent price pick it up, you won't go wrong.

Offline 32 Magnum

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 269
  • Gender: Male
Re: H&R Revolver Questions
« Reply #4 on: February 07, 2008, 10:00:53 AM »
H&R made the decision, back around 1883, not to compete with the "top end" gun manufacturers, but to stay within what was considered the middle cost, utility, blue collar market, where it competed, primarily with Iver Johnson and a couple others.  H&R and IJ managed to stay in business for 100 years after that decision, while all the others pretty much were done by the mid 1920's.  The Double Action Sportsman Model (later called the Model 999) was a staple of the H&R rimfire line-up from circa 1932 until 1986 and was reintroduced in 1987 by NEF.  The early models, pre-WW2 are, in my opinion, the smoothest actions and most accurate.  The Single Action Sportsman (later Model 199) has a faster lock time and is a bit more accurate, although the sights, rifling and barrel lengths are identical to that of the DA.
The other .22 Models mentioned were all made after 1952 and are sturdy, well-made, "blue collar" handguns.  Accuracy is v.good to excellent, and fit and finish are pretty good for pieces at their price point.
Any of the modern Sportsman pieces (these will be DA/SA, as the SA only 199 was discontinued around 1948) will be fine plinkers - and the break action ejection of all empty casings at one time is, well, pretty neat.  There are 9 shot speed loaders available for quick reloading.
I've shot quite a few of the Sportsman (as well as most of the other models) models - and find them to range from acceptable to excellent in function and accuracy.  Valuation of the used pieces has risen dramatically over the past few years - apparently younger shooters have discovered that for the price - H&Rs are a good value.  I've included pictures of a few of my Sportsman pieces for comparison purposes.






Jim Hauff,  H&R Collector

RIP Jim, passed away on October 12th, 2012

Offline BAGTIC

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 520
Re: H&R Revolver Questions
« Reply #5 on: February 16, 2008, 05:25:29 PM »
The first handgun I ever shot was a 999. Just before they were discontinued I bought one of my own. It is a good and reasonably accurate field gun. No complaints.  I have also had a 649 but the sights were so !@#$% that I never could figure out if it was me or the gun that was such a bad shot

Offline torpedoman

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (7)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2574
  • Gender: Male
Re: H&R Revolver Questions
« Reply #6 on: March 07, 2008, 07:30:01 PM »
and heres the first one made in 1871
the nation that forgets it defenders will itself be forgotten

Offline 12Bravo

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 16
Re: H&R Revolver Questions
« Reply #7 on: June 30, 2008, 07:09:02 AM »
I know the thread is kind of old. I have a 949 and fit and function is good. I find that it is an accurate revolver and it hasn't givin me any problems.

Offline djw

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 208
Re: H&R Revolver Questions
« Reply #8 on: August 26, 2008, 04:27:03 PM »
I just handled an H&R nine-shot .22 this evening. It was a double-action, break-top, had the firing pin on the hammer, and a tiiiiny little fixed rear sight on the lever that unlocks the action. I neglected to note the model number. 6" barrel.

I did not buy it, because I was concerned about lock up.  If I cocked it to fire single action, the cylinder would rotate as far as the pawl sent it, but it would not settle all the way into the groove/locked position, and I could jiggle/rotate the cylinder when it was cocked, appearing to let the chamber misalign with the barrel. 

Was this a maintenance/lubrication problem, or is this the nature of the beast?

The condition of the gun was reasonable, but not glossy. Price was ~$150. Worth it or no. I said no, but would like confirmation.  Dealer unlikely to bargain, as this was a big box store that has used guns.

Don

Offline 44 Man

  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2419
  • Gender: Male
Re: H&R Revolver Questions
« Reply #9 on: September 02, 2008, 10:24:41 AM »
No, that is not a maintainance problem.  The gun has a worn hand that turns the cylinder and needs to be replaced or retimed by a gunsmith that REALLY knows his stuff.  I know of one gunsmith that charges double for an H&R because they are so hard to take down and put back together.  I would pass on that gun because to have a safe shooter you would need to spend another $150 to get it working right.  I love these guns but one like that would have to sell for $50 to get my interest.  Sorry, but don't buy that one.  44 Man
You are never too old to have a happy childhood!