« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: 629-4  (Read 669 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nomosendero

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5760
  • Gender: Male
629-4
« on: January 27, 2008, 03:53:01 PM »
I know this has been mentioned more than once, but please list the things that makes a 629-4 stronger than the old 29's. I saw one today that I am thinking about buying. It is not only a 629-4, but also a custom shop version with a heavy barrel with built in Weaver type base, magna port, heavy barrel with removable, hidden weights in the underlug. It is called 1 in 200 series. Pleas let me know your thoughts.
Logged
You will not make peace with the Bluecoats, you are free to go.

Offline Mikey

  • GBO Supporter
  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8734
Re: 629-4
« Reply #1 on: January 28, 2008, 01:10:24 AM »
nomosendaro:  In addition to the weights that were added to the barrel to help control recoil I believe Smith and Wesson slightly redesigned the lockwork so the cylinder would not pop open under heavy recoil.  The lockwork I'm referring to is just the cylinder lockup that holds  the cylinder in place.  Might have had 'front and rear' adjustable sights, too, but I'm not certain.  HTH.  Mikey.
Logged

Offline Dusty Miller

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2271
  • Gender: Male
Re: 629-4
« Reply #2 on: January 28, 2008, 12:36:42 PM »
The 629 is a very strong gun that'll be shoot'n straight when you grandkids are grown.
Logged
When seconds mean life or death, the police are only minutes away!

Offline ken2222

  • Trade Count: (23)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 666
  • Gender: Male
Re: 629-4
« Reply #3 on: January 28, 2008, 03:45:19 PM »
I hope I'm not out of line here but...I have a -5 and I'm looking to change guns. Is there a "best" series in the 29/629 groups...any "periods" that should be avoided? Are the new pistols as good as/better or worse than older years?

Ken
Logged

Offline S.B.

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3953
  • Gender: Male
Re: 629-4
« Reply #4 on: February 06, 2008, 01:03:00 PM »
ENDURANCE PACKAGE!!!
Logged
"The Original Point and Click Interface was a Smith & Wesson."
Life member of NRA, USPSA,ISRA
AF&AM #294
LIUNA #996 for the past 34 years/now retired!

Offline corbanzo

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2405
Re: 629-4
« Reply #5 on: February 06, 2008, 04:48:08 PM »
Even the old 29's held up pretty good to your normal power .44's. 

I think one of the big differences to some people is the transfer bar safety, which the older models didn't have.

Other then the safety things, all that I have seen have been shooters.
Logged
"At least with a gun that big, if you miss and hit the rocks in front of him it'll stone him to death..."

Offline S.B.

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3953
  • Gender: Male
Re: 629-4
« Reply #6 on: February 06, 2008, 05:05:17 PM »
Every model 29, that I have seen,  has had the transfer bar system?
Logged
"The Original Point and Click Interface was a Smith & Wesson."
Life member of NRA, USPSA,ISRA
AF&AM #294
LIUNA #996 for the past 34 years/now retired!

Offline S.B.

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3953
  • Gender: Male
Re: 629-4
« Reply #7 on: February 07, 2008, 05:09:44 PM »
Got a couple my self:

629-4 Classic:



629-4 Mountain Gun:

Logged
"The Original Point and Click Interface was a Smith & Wesson."
Life member of NRA, USPSA,ISRA
AF&AM #294
LIUNA #996 for the past 34 years/now retired!

Offline corbanzo

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2405
Re: 629-4
« Reply #8 on: February 08, 2008, 07:17:42 AM »
Quote from: S.B. on February 06, 2008, 05:05:17 PM
Every model 29, that I have seen,  has had the transfer bar system?

Nope, the 29-1 and 2 didn't.  I have an old 29-2, and it has the hammer attached firing pin.  Not sure if it was the 29-3 that they started doing the transer bar with...  I'll look it up...
Logged
"At least with a gun that big, if you miss and hit the rocks in front of him it'll stone him to death..."

Offline S.B.

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3953
  • Gender: Male
Re: 629-4
« Reply #9 on: February 08, 2008, 10:48:16 AM »
Beg to differ with you but, S&W revolvers have had the transfer bar safety system since right after WWII, when they used S prefixed serial numbers standing for safety? Please read in Standard Catalog of Smith and Wesson 2nd edition by Supica & Nahas page no.117 left column in .44 Hand ejector (post war)(1926 Model .44 Military), and you'll better understand what your talking about? Hammer mounted firing piss have nothing to do with transfer bar ignition?
Logged
"The Original Point and Click Interface was a Smith & Wesson."
Life member of NRA, USPSA,ISRA
AF&AM #294
LIUNA #996 for the past 34 years/now retired!
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »