Author Topic: Puma '92 Question??  (Read 1545 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline aglass1987

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 105
  • Gender: Male
Puma '92 Question??
« on: January 30, 2008, 06:21:07 PM »
I just recently bought a (Rossi) Puma 1892 winchester copy in a 44 mag. I put a big loop lever on it like i have done with the rest of my lever rifles. But the problem is when i twirl it (with blanks of course!!!) the bullet comes out of the gun where it ejects. But The actual brass part itself stays in the gun, its just that its pointed straight up out of the gun. Any answers or ideas, or reasons?? I thought it might have been cause of the heavy bullet im shooting making it want to turn upward?? Ive owned a actual winchester 357 and i twirled it just and the bullet chambered just fine. Any help???

Offline Oldtimer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1170
Re: Puma '92 Question??
« Reply #1 on: January 31, 2008, 01:49:16 AM »
Make sure your health and life insurance policies are paid up.  You might also want to start practicing writing with the other hand.  There was a movie star some years ago who left this world with the help of a blank cartridge.

Offline Castaway

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1105
  • Gender: Male
Re: Puma '92 Question??
« Reply #2 on: January 31, 2008, 02:10:26 AM »
I'm wondering how if you're shooting blanks, what do you mean that the heavy bullet may be causing the problem.  When the 92 feeds. there is nothing but gravity to hold the cartridge down as it leaves the magazine tube and is brought up by the lifter.

Offline Blowtorch53

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Avid Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 164
  • Gender: Male
Re: Puma '92 Question??
« Reply #3 on: February 01, 2008, 11:04:03 AM »
I thought Chuck Conners died???  By the way, count the rounds.  He fires 13 times before giving you the evil eye.

BT53
"That God could and would if He were sought"

Offline Blackhawk44

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 981
Re: Puma '92 Question??
« Reply #4 on: February 01, 2008, 11:28:30 AM »
Thankfully, Chuck died of pheumonia precipitated by lung cancer rather than mishandling firearms.  Aglass, you will continue to sling rounds out forever unless you do the same thing that Rod Reddwing did for Mr. Connors- fit a sping loaded plunger above the chamber to hold the nose of upcoming rounds while the action is open.  Simple. 

Re-read what Oldtimer said !

Offline aglass1987

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 105
  • Gender: Male
Re: Puma '92 Question??
« Reply #5 on: February 02, 2008, 05:45:35 PM »
Thankfully, Chuck died of pheumonia precipitated by lung cancer rather than mishandling firearms.  Aglass, you will continue to sling rounds out forever unless you do the same thing that Rod Reddwing did for Mr. Connors- fit a sping loaded plunger above the chamber to hold the nose of upcoming rounds while the action is open.  Simple. 

Re-read what Oldtimer said !

 Can anyone give me some info on this spring loaded plunger please?? thanks

Offline Lloyd Smale

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (32)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18255
Re: Puma '92 Question??
« Reply #6 on: February 03, 2008, 08:37:29 PM »
he fired blanks so it could have been something that would only work with them.
blue lives matter

Offline Oldtimer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1170
Re: Puma '92 Question??
« Reply #7 on: February 05, 2008, 02:45:58 AM »
I was thinking of an actor, Jon-Erik Hexum, who shot himself in the head with a .44 Magnum filled with blanks.  Check out this URL: http://urbansemiotic.com/2006/01/22/the-sad-lesson-of-jon-erik-hexum/.  Even with a rose-crimped blank, there are incandescent gasses coming out of the muzzle at several thousand feet per second.  As for the blanks that Conner probably used, there was a blank called the 5-in-1 blank, which would work in a .38-40 rifle or pistol, .44-40 rifle or pistol, or .45 Colt.   

Offline yankeeapple

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 36
Re: Puma '92 Question??
« Reply #8 on: March 01, 2008, 03:38:51 AM »
I was thinking of an actor, Jon-Erik Hexum, who shot himself in the head with a .44 Magnum filled with blanks.  Check out this URL: http://urbansemiotic.com/2006/01/22/the-sad-lesson-of-jon-erik-hexum/.  Even with a rose-crimped blank, there are incandescent gasses coming out of the muzzle at several thousand feet per second.  As for the blanks that Conner probably used, there was a blank called the 5-in-1 blank, which would work in a .38-40 rifle or pistol, .44-40 rifle or pistol, or .45 Colt.   

Brandon Lee (Bruce Lee's Son) was also killed by a "Blank" in a round a bout way.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandon_Lee

Offline Blackhawk44

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 981
Re: Puma '92 Question??
« Reply #9 on: March 01, 2008, 10:30:57 AM »
Aglass, this will answer you questions completely.  http://www.riflemansrifle.com/may1960.htm