Author Topic: More on Russian artillery  (Read 599 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline cannonmn

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3345
More on Russian artillery
« on: February 04, 2008, 12:43:03 AM »
Boris M. sent me a page of thumbnail pix of some of the pieces in the St. Petersburg museum-no the picture quality isn't perfect, but still very interesting.  One thing I like about that collection, so many of their pieces are still mounted on original carriages.  I suspect the colder climate doesn't rot wood as quickly as elsewhere.  Also, that museum is one of the oldest in the world, originally dedicated to artillery, so items were put in it on a permanent basis, long ago, and are still there.

Everyone probably knows this, but click on the small photo to get a bigger one.

We've previously posted the link to the large set of the museum's photos.

I still think I wouldn't mind being a janitor or night watchman in that museum.  But then they might need to hire someone to watch the watchman.

 http://megobor.boom.ru/artmus/guneng.htm

Offline KABAR2

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2830
Re: More on Russian artillery
« Reply #1 on: February 04, 2008, 04:30:26 AM »
Cannonmn,

Those are some great photos,

I think photo # 1 may be a good example of what happens
when a cannon is designed by committee  :o




I wish you could do a shooting video on that one! I have a feeling
it would be interesting to say the least........
Mr president I do not cling to either my gun or my Bible.... my gun is holstered on my side so I may carry my Bible and quote from it!

Sed tamen sal petrae LURO VOPO CAN UTRIET sulphuris; et sic facies tonituum et coruscationem si scias artficium

Offline Artilleryman

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1378
Re: More on Russian artillery
« Reply #2 on: February 04, 2008, 04:32:41 AM »
Makes you wonder what the sponging and worming procedures were.  I would like to see the ammunition that these guns used.  It would give a whole new meaning to "cannonball".
Norm Gibson, 1st SC Vol., ACWSA

Offline cannonmn

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3345
Re: More on Russian artillery
« Reply #3 on: February 04, 2008, 04:58:22 AM »
I know the one with the oval bore fired a disc-like projectile. It was to be kept secret.  It was called the Shuvalov System, and "Secret Howitzer Model 1753."  There are extensive inscriptions on the barrel about all the officials who approved it, inspcted it, cast it, etc., more than I have time to write here.  The barrel is bronze and weighs in at 491 kg., the bore is 95x207mm., barrel length 162cm.

The rectangular bore gun has cast iron barrel,  is called an "experimental 3-pounder gun."  It was cast in Olonets in 1722.  From their catalog, pp. 89:  "The cannon was intended for firing with three 3-pounder balls, all together, Because of this balls were wrapped all round with linen, placed in one row on a wooden tray (spiegel) and tied with a rope round."
Cal. 80x230mm.  Weight of barrel 492 Kg., length 156cm,


Interesting.   

Offline Cat Whisperer

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7493
  • Gender: Male
  • Pulaski Coehorn Works
Re: More on Russian artillery
« Reply #4 on: February 04, 2008, 01:30:59 PM »
Amazing that these were kept around at all!

Tim K                 www.GBOCANNONS.COM
Cat Whisperer
Chief of Smoke, Pulaski Coehorn Works & Winery
U.S.Army Retired
N 37.05224  W 80.78133 (front door +/- 15 feet)

Offline dominick

  • GBO Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (21)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1367
  • Gender: Male
    • Black Powder Cannons & Mortars
Re: More on Russian artillery
« Reply #5 on: February 05, 2008, 01:31:48 PM »
Here's another site that has Some pre-1899 Russian Artillery pics   http://www.thetankmaster.com/artillery.asp

Offline cannonmn

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3345
Re: More on Russian artillery
« Reply #6 on: February 05, 2008, 02:48:18 PM »
Very interesting, many pieces I've never seen before, probably due to a lot more Russians getting on the web.

Here's the link to that site, I don't know why it didn't "take" as an active link in the first post..

http://www.thetankmaster.com/artillery.asp