I have recently been thinking, at what point is technology too much?
Generally, there is no denying that firearms, and their related components (scopes, etc) have improved over the last 40 years.
Let's look at muzzle loaders, for example. They have really come a long way. From shooting inconsistent roundish balls on top of loose powder, to high tech bullets in sabots on top of pellets. Accuracy on some of these rifles in on par with centerfire rifles, and their range has increased to 150 yards or more. Davie Crocket sure would be impressed.
Now let's look at scopes. We now have glass where 95% light transmission is common place. We even have illuminated reticles. We have also seen laser rangefinders in some scopes. Heck, Leupold just came out with a system in its scopes where it adjusts bullet drop based on the angle that you are shooting.
Interestingly, centerfire rifles don't seem to have gone through any significant design improvement. Yes, we now use stainless barrels, actions, etc., and also high tech synthetic stocks, but nothing too major. Okay, Savage has come out with a new trigger design with it's Accu-trigger, but I don't find that to be that big of a deal - other companies like Tikka and Sako, for example, have factory triggers that rival a jewel trigger. T/C has come out with its new Icon, but you really can't say that it's a radical design or improvement.
Then there is ammunition. Okay, bullets such as Nosler Partitions and Remington core-locks have been around for longer than I've been around, and they sure have, as they still do, account for the harvest of many deer and other animals. However, there is no denying that there has been substantial improvement in bullet designs and powder, improving both accuracy and downrage performance.
So, where are we heading to next? Laser guns capable of shooting 5,000 yards and shooting as flat as a ruler all the way that far out?
I have seen some people turn away from centerfire rifles and go back to muzzleloaders to make it more challenging.
Now, don't get me wrong, I am all for improvements, and I certainly buy into some of the hype. Also, I perfectly understand the argument that such design improvements can lessen the chance of missing/wounding an animal. But, on the other hand, you can miss a deer at 50 yards with a muzzle loader just like you can miss it with a centerfire rifle at 200, or just like you can miss it at 25 yards with a bow and arrow.
The question is, for you, at what point is technology just too much?
Zachary