Author Topic: The .270 again.  (Read 3468 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Country Boy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 932
The .270 again.
« on: February 11, 2008, 08:49:24 AM »
 Whats your view of the .270 as a deer only rifle ? Any one actually use one in the field ? What kind ?

Offline Kurt L

  • Trade Count: (15)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 684
  • Gender: Male
Re: The .270 again.
« Reply #1 on: February 11, 2008, 09:14:57 AM »
I have a old Remington 760 in the 270 Win.
To be short it has killed a ton of deer and zapps them like lightning.
I have used the Hornady 110 Hp for years and i have had a lot less
lost or wounded animals than with the 130 psp.Never lost a deer to the 110s
i have to the 130s.
neck shots i am sure both would work good.side shots the 270 with 110 HP
in the ribs is like tossing a hand grenade in the lungs and makes soup there done.
KURT LGo TO RIFLE RED RYDER SUPER MAG CARBINE

Offline dw06

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1074
  • Gender: Male
Re: The .270 again.
« Reply #2 on: February 11, 2008, 10:57:08 AM »
I've never owned one, but have reloaded and worked up loads for a couple. Got to see them in action on whitetail and mule deer. From what I've seen, makes a fine deer cartridge and one hunting buddy who is 78 years young has used his savage 110 for close to 50 years and swears by it. Who am I to say otherwise?
If you find yourself in a hole,the first thing to do is stop digging-Will Rogers

Offline tigerstripes

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 20
Re: The .270 again.
« Reply #3 on: February 11, 2008, 11:41:26 AM »
It's a killer but sometimes it can be hard to track one, but I guess that happens to all.
My GOD, My GOD i have so much left to do, who will take care of my darling LSU?   The KINGFISH.

Offline nodlenor

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 455
  • Gender: Male
Re: The .270 again.
« Reply #4 on: February 11, 2008, 12:07:20 PM »
I also have a 760 Remington in 270 Win. I bought it new in 1966. I've killed several deer with it. I think it is a great gun and a great caliber. There are lots of calibers that will work on deer but there is nothing wrong with the 270 Win. 

Kirt L, Do you reload? If so, I would like to know the load you use with the 110gr. I would like to try it. I've used mainly the 130gr.
Self government without self discipline will not work; Paul Harvey

Offline kenscot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 372
Re: The .270 again.
« Reply #5 on: February 11, 2008, 01:31:42 PM »
Wow , I don't think there is a better deer cartridge period!

Offline drdougrx

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3212
Re: The .270 again.
« Reply #6 on: February 11, 2008, 02:44:35 PM »
Use it all the time on all kinds of animals.  Currently working up a 160gr Nosler Partition load just because I have a couple hundred of these left over from a 1985 bbear hunt and want to try'm on deer.  Have to admit though, 150gr NosBT with 58gr RL-22 will be very hard to beat indeedee.
If you like, please enjoy some of my hunt pics at:

http://public.fotki.com/DrDougRx

If you leave a comment, please leave your GB screen name so that I can reply back!

Offline nomosendero

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5760
  • Gender: Male
Re: The .270 again.
« Reply #7 on: February 11, 2008, 03:05:28 PM »
I used a 270 with great results last fall on Antelope, Mule Deer & Whitetail, 6 all combined. I used a 140 gr. Accubond & harvested animals from 60 yards to 410 yards. The terminal effect was great & all were complete pass throughs, nuff said.
You will not make peace with the Bluecoats, you are free to go.

Offline Kurt L

  • Trade Count: (15)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 684
  • Gender: Male
Re: The .270 again.
« Reply #8 on: February 12, 2008, 01:54:36 AM »
nodlenor.
I have had the best luck with the horady 110 HP at 48.2gr 4064 in my gun.
I tried other charges to get more speed but they open up group size a lot
also tried the 90 gr sierra with no luck but this gun likes the 110 Hp at load above.
KURT LGo TO RIFLE RED RYDER SUPER MAG CARBINE

Offline nodlenor

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 455
  • Gender: Male
Re: The .270 again.
« Reply #9 on: February 12, 2008, 06:34:55 AM »
Thanks, Kurt L.
I'll try that in my rifle and see how it likes it.
Self government without self discipline will not work; Paul Harvey

Offline Kurt L

  • Trade Count: (15)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 684
  • Gender: Male
Re: The .270 again.
« Reply #10 on: February 12, 2008, 08:36:38 AM »
nodlenor.
no problem,I hope yours likes it too!
KURT LGo TO RIFLE RED RYDER SUPER MAG CARBINE

Offline fatercat

  • Trade Count: (14)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 690
Re: The .270 again.
« Reply #11 on: February 12, 2008, 09:47:39 AM »
the 270 is enough for anything on this earth. i saw a big grizz drop and killed dead with one shot 270 150 gn nosler partition. same could be said about 30-06.

Offline Tunaman

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 464
Re: The .270 again.
« Reply #12 on: February 12, 2008, 03:35:09 PM »
The classics are classics for a reason. I have killed many deer with a 270.

Offline lgm270

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1862
Re: The .270 again.
« Reply #13 on: February 13, 2008, 02:16:56 PM »
I have used the .270 Win for Deer and wild boar for more than 30 years using 130 grain Nosler Partitions and H-4831 and RL -22 power for 3,050 fps (22" Barrel) and 3,150 (24" Barrel).  I have never lost a deer or boar hit with this load.  My longest shot was 301 yards (measured with laser rangefinder) and I recovered a 130 grain Nosler that was balled up against the far hide of the large Wyoming mule deer.  I've killed several  wild boar dead with one shot with this same 130 grain load.  The largest was 285 lbs.

I have used the 150 grain Nosler Partition on deer, but could not tell that it was any better than the 130.   

I have shot a couple with factory ammo, but was not as satisfied.  Didn't seem to put them down as well as the Nosler partitions.

There is no better deer round than the .270/130 grain Nosler Partition.  I've shot them as close as 10 yards and as far as 300 and I have never
lost one. Kills and leaves good blood trails.  The blood trails, however, were very short.

My 24" .270 gives 3,150 fps with 60 Gr. RL-22 and 130 grain Nosler partitions.  According to Federals ballistics catalog, the 7mm Rem Mag with 140 grain Nosler Partitions gives 3,140 fps.  The same velociity with only 10 more grains of bullet weight.    I've hunted with many guys using 7mm Rem Mags and some of the worst shooting I have ever seen was by hunters with this magnum round.  I have concluded that  most guys who use them are simply not willing to practice and acquire  the skills to handle a round that kicks much harder and is very much louder...with almost no increase in killing power.  I have chronographed  many 7mm Rem Magnum rifles at the range and was stunned by the results:  The norm is about 3,050 for the 150 grain bullet.  With the 150 grain Nosler Partition in my .270 with a 24" barrel, I can get from 2,985-3,035 fps...without magnum recoil and muzzle blast.  Personally I think the 7mm Rem Mag is greatly overrated.  Maybe with 160-175 Grain Bullets it's better than the .270  for elk, but in my book still no cigar.   

For elik I use a .338 Win Mag.  I do not think the .270 Win is really suitable for elk, although everyone will post their indignant angry responses about how the .270 will kill anything with a properly placed shot.  Well if you believe that, read the threads by JJ Hack in the African hunting section and note his substantial experiences with losing animals shot with under .30 cal rifles as compared with over .30 cal rifles.  There's also a good online thread by Russell Thornberry about hunting big whitetails in Alberta in the brush. He reported that when hunters switched from .270/7mm rifles to 35 Whelen and .375 H&H, they had no  wounded animals lost in the brush.  So, maybe there are better rounds for large deer in the brush than the .270 Win.  I can only say that in 30 years, I've never had a problem.   

I do not like chasing wounded animals and on elk hunting trips I've had to help other guys chase elk wounded with .270's and 7mm Mags.  My 338 Win Mag Long Throated to handle  250 Grain Nosler Partitions (2,800 fps)  produces a blood trail that usually is only a few yards to a dead or mortally wounded elk.  That is my experience.   

Offline SingleShotShorty

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 327
  • Gender: Female
Re: The .270 again.
« Reply #14 on: February 14, 2008, 12:36:50 PM »
The 270 Win is one fine Deer rifle, it is flat shooting with min recoil and with 130 grain ballistic tips or Partitions it's just plain Bad to the bone
Old Age and Treachery Will Alway's Overcome
Youth and Skill.

Offline RaySendero

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1064
  • Gender: Male
Re: The .270 again.
« Reply #15 on: February 14, 2008, 01:31:41 PM »
Rem M700 in 270 Win. is my go-to beanfield and high-line rifle.

My preferred hand load is 150 SGKs over IMR-4530.

But.....Rifle likes most every reload I've tried - 130 RCLs, 135 SMKs, 140 HILs, 150 SGKs and 160 NPTs as long as I don't put them in a Federal case (for whatever reason???).

PS: I've had more band-flops with this rifle than all the others I own put together.
    Ray

Offline fatercat

  • Trade Count: (14)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 690
Re: The .270 again.
« Reply #16 on: February 14, 2008, 03:38:14 PM »
IGM270, it plain to see that you and i are almost on the same page. i have a 35 whelen that i hunt elk with now, however i have a record book elk on my wall that i took with a 270. you are not are of my age? these young fellars need io know that it don't take the camp stove at 3500 fps to kill a elk or a grizz

Offline lgm270

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1862
Re: The .270 again.
« Reply #17 on: February 14, 2008, 04:03:57 PM »
IGM270, it plain to see that you and i are almost on the same page. i have a 35 whelen that i hunt elk with now, however i have a record book elk on my wall that i took with a 270. you are not are of my age? these young fellars need io know that it don't take the camp stove at 3500 fps to kill a elk or a grizz

fatercat:  We are indeed on the same page. My next elk rifle will be a .35 Whelen.   Congratulations on your record book elk.  If you would be willing to share the details of the  story of how you got him,  I would love to hear it and I'm sure many others on this board would feel the same way. 

Offline Crazyman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: The .270 again.
« Reply #18 on: February 14, 2008, 09:13:46 PM »
I've been using the 270 for over 30 years. It was my meat gun while living in the bush for 10 years in Alaska. I took a bull moose every year with the 130 gr. Core-Lokt with no fuss no muss along with a few caribou black bears and one mountain grizzly. I've been using it here for the past 20 years in Washington State on Blacktail, Mule Deer and our big bodied Roosevelt elk. I do lean towards the 130 gr. Partitions these days though. I've always been careful where I put the bullet and every animal I shot either dropped or was recovered quickly. There are many great calibers to choose from and I'm not saying the 270 is the perfect rifle but it has taken a lot of game for me over the years.

Offline Siskiyou

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3417
  • Gender: Male
Re: The .270 again.
« Reply #19 on: February 15, 2008, 08:00:18 AM »
I keep telling my wife that a man must own more then one .270 Winchester.  It is not often you see a golfer who only has one club, or a serous fisherman who has only one hook, or a woman who allows a man to own only one pair of under shorts.

There should be no limit on the number of .270 Winchester a man owns, even if some do not get used every year.  It is always nice to be able to grab a spare rifle if you take a fall during the hunting season.  No hunting days are lost returning to the range checking the sights, or having to install a new scope.

Topography and vegetation many times dictates which rifle is most suitable for a hunt.  Now any .270 is suitable for most hunting situations but some actions, and loads can be tailored to optimize the effectiveness.  A couple of examples are:

A lot of the country I hunt is steep, and covered with heavy vegetation.  Most shots are close but there are a few long-range opportunities.  Normally deer are kicked out of their beds and shot at close range.  I have found the Remington M760 is ideal for these situations.  It comes to the shoulder quickly and the hunter can swing on the deer just like a duck or quail when using the Remington M870 shotgun.  The power level of the .270 Win. is more then adequate for this use.  I have killed numerous deer in this situation using 130-grain bullets, but I have come to prefer 150-grain bullets because of the greater penetration.  A heart shot deer can quickly disappear in cover and blood pumping out of two holes is better tracking then with one.

I have taken at least one buck at over three hundred yards with the M760 but I prefer a different combination for long-range hunting.

For long-range antelope and mule deer hunting I like a lightweight bolt action .270.  I have had great success with the 130-grain Hornady SP, but I switched to the 140-grain Hornaday BTSP because it is superior after 100 yards.  When needed these combinations have also proven effective at close range.  It is the answer when hunting calls for hiking to distant peaks.

Then a guy always needs a fall back or fall down rifle.  If you spend much time hiking in the woods, on steep slopes, or across lava flows you are going to bust your can.  In my case a M700 in 270 Win. is ready to go.  It is sighted in to shoot 150-grain bullets, but without changing the setting it is effective with 140-grain bullets.  I recently read that if you have a favorite rifle and load do not shot it across a Chrony.  I found this rifle to have a slow barrel.  With the same load, on the same day it is approximately 30 f.p.s slower then the others.  I have considered a number of solutions to this problem.  At first I thought of buying a take-off twenty-four inch barrel to replace the 22-inch barrel.  But this seems wasteful of an otherwise good barrel.  The most logical solution would be to purchase a .270 Winchester with a 24-inch barrel.

A brother has a .270 Ackley Improved.  He has been very careful in seeing that the rifle never gets fired across a Chrony.  In turn I would like to fire his rifle across a Chrony and see if there is a gain.

As a kid with a 270 Winchester I was enthused with the ballistic tables, and always wanted to upgrade to a Weatherby .270 Magnum.  The cost put it out of my reach and after handling a couple of them I felt they were to heavy and reflected too much light for my taste.  But I have never completely got over that need.  I even went as far as buying a 7MM Magnum at a much low price for hunting heavier game.  But I came to the conclusion the .270 Winchester is more then suitable for deer and antelope and the 7Magnum does not get called on.

I realize that there is more expertise out there and my conclusions are only based on fifty hunting seasons.  A lesson learned is that a .270 Winchester deserves a good scope.  You do not save money on a bottomline, entry-level scope, because you will soon replace it.  I have never owned a top of the line scope, but have found that a number of moderately price scopes are a good value.  As a kid I spent my haying money on a couple of cheap scopes that had parallax issues and fogged up.  I ended up spending additional money for better scopes.  For years I used 4x scopes but as variable power scopes improved I started using them.  I normally have my scope set at the lowest power for those close quick action shots because there is normally time to up the power for long shots.  I found that powering up to 10X great when it came time to sort out the largest buck out of a group at long range.  The down side to 10X was seeing the cross hairs shake on the deer’s chest.

The results:













There is a learning process to effectively using a gps.  Do not throw your compass and map away!

Boycott: San Francisco, L.A., Oakland, and City of Sacramento, CA.

Offline lgm270

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1862
Re: The .270 again.
« Reply #20 on: February 15, 2008, 09:52:33 AM »
Siskiyou:  What a great post!  What a great  tribute to the .270 and the premise that there is no limit to the number of .270's a man should be allowed to own.   :)

Your observation about 150 grain bullets being superior for deer because their increased penetration causes  an exit hole for increased blood loss and a better blood trail  increased penetration frankly did not occur to me.  The only 130 Nosler partition I ever recovered was from a deer shot at 301 yards and it did not exit.  All others exited because they were shot at closer ranges.  Would you be willing to share your loading data for 150 grain bullets and chronograph results, if any?  I would love to review them. 

Your comments about the importance of a quality scope are very well stated and well grounded.

I really enjoyed your narrative of how  your  youthful .270 Win  infatuation continued on into adult hood. It reminded me of my own. I got my first .270 Win when I was a teenager and the .270 Win is still my favorite hunting caliber for deer sized animals. 

I hope you have 50 more successful hunting seasons.  Best.

Offline Country Boy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 932
Re: The .270 again.
« Reply #21 on: February 15, 2008, 10:38:21 AM »
I've hunted 53 years and have used almost every rifle OR CARTIGE THAT COMES DOWN THE PIKE fOR DEER ONLY, Killed my first buck i953 with a 30-30 More important to me than caliber is a rifle that fits, throw it up with your eyes closed, when you open them you should see your sight and target. You don't need some fancy custom job. Most hunters can do it themselves  Have any of you read  Francis Sell or Larry Collier, or John Wooters ?  all they seem to talk about is stock fit and Wooters the .308. So I use the .308 factory or reloads, it doesn't matter.

Offline fatercat

  • Trade Count: (14)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 690
Re: The .270 again.
« Reply #22 on: February 15, 2008, 03:15:22 PM »
don't think i've ever seen so much knowledge and well written comments on a the old time 270. having a good scope and having it mounted with good rings and bases is the one and 1st thing you must do . the first 270 rifle i had was a used savage 110. i then save my pennies and put a leupold scope. rings and base. i paid more for the optics than the rifle. buy good glass. one more thing, check the used scope bin and if you find a used leupold they(leupold) will honor their lifetime warranty. i sent one back and got it back as new.   

Offline thumbcocker

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 160
Re: The .270 again.
« Reply #23 on: February 15, 2008, 04:06:31 PM »
I've used a 270 since 1975. Mine is a remington 700 bdl. I use 57.5 grs. of H-4831 and  150 gr. speer hot cors. Kills 'em dead.

Offline FourBee

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1770
  • Gender: Male
Re: The .270 again.
« Reply #24 on: February 15, 2008, 04:27:03 PM »
One can rest assured, that the .270 will do its job as long as the shooter will do what he's supposed to do.
The .270 is an awesome caliber.
Enjoy your rights to keep and bear arms.

Offline Siskiyou

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3417
  • Gender: Male
Re: The .270 again.
« Reply #25 on: February 15, 2008, 07:11:08 PM »





While I always wanted to load the 130-grain Nosler PT in the .270 I could not afford to do so.  For a long time in my fascination with retained velocity I loaded 130-grain Remington Bronze Pts. and killed a fair number of deer with them.  The Bronze Pts.  normally would blow-up inside the chest cavity destroy heart and lung tissue, and at times part of the liver.  In this condition the deer might go a 100 yards, leaving a few dime size blood drops.  The problem would come when the deer would rolled down the hill a few hundred feet out of sight.  I never recovered a mushroomed Bronze Pt.  just fragments.

The Remington 130-grain C-L under the same conditions when the bullet was place at an angle behind the shoulder would penetrate the chest cavity and muscle on the off side shoulder to be found under the hide.  I cannot find any of those old bullets but suspect retained weight was around 20 percent.

The Hornady 130-grain SP was a bullet I really came to like in the .270 Winchester for use on antelope and deer.  A favorite load was 60.5 grains of WW785 with this bullet.  Even at long range it would completely penetrate a large antelope, leaving a large exit wound.

Normally I would find the 130-grain bullet in similar condition as pictured on the far side on deer.  The one pictured was a behind the shoulder shot around 145-150 yards.  The deer may have run fifty feet before dropping.  The load was 59 grains of original 4831, or H4831 to the youngsters.  When fired from my Savage 110CL with a 22-inch barrel the velocity is approximately 3015 fps 15-feet from the muzzle.  This was at approximately 6700-foot elevation.  **** I should note that IMR 4831 is a faster burning powder and should not be substituted for H4831.  The recovered bullet retained 84 grains.



Before I started loading the Hornady bullet I purchased a Savage 110CL in .270 Winchester.  In theory it became my open country rifle and the Remington M760 became my heavy cover rifle.  At the same time I was becoming jealous of my buddy who was shooting deer with 165 and 180-grain bullets in their -06 and have an easier time tracking because of the increased blood flow.  I all ready knew that my woodsman friend and logger Fred had been successfully using the 150-grain Remington C-L in his .270 Win. on deer for many years.  In the kid years I was not impressed with the bullet because of it’s published velocity, and round nose compared to the racy Bronze Pt.  But I could not deny Fred’s success.  I had some learning to do!

I happen into a sporting goods store that had some 150-grain Norma Match bullets on the bargain shelve.  At the time l lived at a location where I could try my loads a few hundred yards from the house and there would be no complaints.  After following the recommendations I settled on what at that time was a middle of the road load.  Today it is considered a near maximum load in a number of manuals.  My final hunting load using 150-grain Norma Match, 150 grain Remington  C-L, and 150-grain Hornady SP is 56.5 grains of H4831 in Remington cases, and using CCI standard large rifle primers.

The immediate plus side to the 150-grain Norma was a good exit hole with blood and other debris on the ground.  The Norma bullet was designed for Match and not hunting use.  It was common to find the jacket hanging in the hide next to the exit hole.

To insure good functioning in the Remington M760 I purchased five twenty round boxes of primed brass just for hunting.  This has been very effective ammunition and I use other brass for practice.  I still have few loaded boxes set aside for hunting.

The next big bargain came when I found a number of boxes of Remington 150 grain C-L on sale at a sporting goods store.  I have not recovered any from a deer because they fully penetrate a deer, along with Hornady 150-grain bullet.  Now days my bullet of choice is the 150-grain Hornady because of it’s better long range characteristics. 

My average velocity across the Chrony at 15-feet from the muzzle at 6700 foot elevation using a Savage 110 with a 22-inch barrel gave the following.

H4831 56.5 grains 150-grain Hornady SP Rem Cases CCI200 primer  2893 fps
H4831  56.5 grains 150-grain Rem-CL Rem Cases CCI200 primer 2884 fps

The average velocity with the 150-grain Hornady on the same day was 2831 fps from my Remington 700 with a 22-inch barrel.

When I tested the 150-grain Serria BT I had to drop down to 56.0 grains of H4831.  I did not have a Chrony at during this period.

I had a few boxes of factory WW 150 grain power point loads.  I was going to shoot it up and reload the brass because I was not satisfied with the accuracy in the M760.  I had a new scope for the M700 and started shooting the ammunition.  It was very accurate in the M700 and I decided to hang on to it for hunting.  The picture of the recovered bullet in my earlier post is a 150-grain PP that provide about 25-inches of penetration in a frontal shot on a mule deer.  While disappointed in the velocity the end results were outstanding.

Factory Winchester-Western Super-X Power Point 15 feet from muzzle gave 2727 fps when fired out of my Remington 700 barrel.

Some older Factory loaded Hornady Frontier brand 150-grain gave me 2809 out of my Savage 110.

The nice thing about my 150-grain loads is that all three rifles like them.

Now days when I go hunting with the M760 it is loaded with 150-grain bullets.  The Remington 700 is loaded with factory 150-grain WW ammunition.

I love my Savage 110CL in .270 Winchester, I purchased it over 40-years ago and it been my long-range deer rifle and antelope rifle.  It has proven accurate and effective with 130-grain bullets.

When Hornady came out with its 140-grain BTSP for the .270 I jumped on the bandwagon because of its ability to retain long-range velocity and energy.  I started working up a load using H4831 and settled at 57.2 grains for a velocity of 2868 fps.   I had tried a little more because the published maximum was 59.9 grains.  My rifle would not come close to that using H4831 and I backed off to where I was comfortable, and had an accurate load.  Of course the next challenge was to try the load on deer.  I climbed out on a rocky perch that over looks and area covered with sage, a few trees, and Mountain Mahogany.  A good place to get a shot out over 400-yards.  Before I could settle in I heard the rattle of rocks below me and spotted a buck taking off.  I almost needed a fire extinguisher to put out smokes in his fir.  The bullet did its job and put the deer down.  Later examination showed the bullet broke up on the spine, but did massive damage.  Fragments of bullet were recovered.  A little longer barrel and I could have made a contact shot, so it is hard to judge the bullet because of the close range.

I was not satisfied with the H4831 load, and started looking for data using WW785 Ball Powder. (Now discontinued)  I found what I wanted in the Hornady 3rd Edition and purchased it.  WW785 is a little slower burning then H4831.

I did not have a Chrony at the time, but I spent a summer on load development and testing.  The closer to the published maximum the more accurate the load became and it exceeded H4831 in the accuracy department.  The maximum load in the manual is 59.4 grains.  I loaded to that level without any problems but dropped back to 59.3 grains.  I tested the load at my low elevation shooting spot on 90° days without a problem.  I then tested at my high elevation shooting range and obtained an average of 3030 fps out of the Savage 110 barrel.  I then loaded and tested the load using Remington Nickel cases.  I did this to identify this accurate load so that they would not get shot-up for non-hunting purposes.

A few years ago I had the chance to buy a good supply of discontinued old style WW 140 grain, boattail Silvertips.  This is the old style aluminum tip, not the current plastic tip bullet.  I read an article about these bullets years ago written by Rick Jamison. (sp) I ran out and purchased some Winchester BALL WMR Powder (Winchester Magnum Rifle) because they had dropped WW785.    I started my load development process using information from a Winchester data sheet, and Hornaday 7th Edition.  At this point I have stopped my load development at 57.8 grains of WMR.  Velocity is recorded as 2917 fps from the Savage 110 at 3500-foot elevation.  This produced a 3/8-inch group.  I lost the daylight needed to make the Chrony operate but as a point of comparison I had earlier fired a round using 58.0 grains of WMR in the Remington 700 and the Savage 110.  Both rifles have 22-inch barrels.  The 700 record an average velocity of 2866 and the 110 a velocity of 2909 fps.

A few thoughts crossed my mind regarding the 700, buy a 24-inch barrel, or buy another 270 Winchester with a 24-inch barrel.  I was also sneaking looks at closeout ads on Winchester M70 rifles for a 270WSM.  It was a good fortune that I did not see such an ad.  There were some good prices on other calibers.

Frankly a 6.5X55 saved me from spending the extra money.  I looked back on a buck I shot using a 140-grain bullet at 2550 fps.  It was amazingly effective with a 140-grain bullet traveling at 300+ fps slower.  My point is that you can take deer with any number of calibers, and rifles.  My current Remington 700 is a keeper.

In my Dad’s memory this year I carried his old Remington 722, 300 Savage bolt-action rifle hunting one morning.  I had upgraded the scope, loaded the ammunition, and shot it a fair amount before the season.  I was able to collect a nice buck with it, but when I leave the house next season I will most likely carry a .270 Winchester, and there is a fair chance it will be the M760 Dad gave me in 1957. 

Thanks Dad.


















There is a learning process to effectively using a gps.  Do not throw your compass and map away!

Boycott: San Francisco, L.A., Oakland, and City of Sacramento, CA.

Offline lgm270

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1862
Re: The .270 again.
« Reply #26 on: February 15, 2008, 09:36:51 PM »
Siskiyou:  Great post.  Thanks for sharing your wonderful history with the .270 Win and your experiences with us. 

Offline Brithunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2538
Re: The .270 again.
« Reply #27 on: February 15, 2008, 11:59:34 PM »
Hi All,

      I too ma rather fond of the Winchester 270 cartridge and my first full bore rifle was a BSA CF2 Stutzen (full stock) with 20" barrel that I still have. Wonderfully accurate, later I acquired several other rifles chambered for the .270 cartridge and now have four of them all made by the old BSA company. Two are the same model I acquired the first very cheap as it was in quite poor condition later I was offered an excellent one still quite cheaply so the first one I am thinking od re-barreling.

     Now for me the .270 has been an unlucky cartridge when hunting for whenever I carried a .270 Rifle the deer seen were either the wrong deer or sex or it was an unsafe shot. It was not until 2005 that I finally bloodied a .270 rifle on a nice Muntjac Buck, the rifle was a BSA Majestic Feather Weight fitted with a 3-9x42 Lisenfield.

Offline bavarianbrit

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Posts: 2
Re: The .270 again.
« Reply #28 on: May 05, 2008, 07:56:57 AM »
Hello Brit hunter,
I was an apprentice at BSA in armoury road in Birmingham in 1965 and often watched the stockmaking section at work. They made good rifles.
Now I am in Bavaria, Germany - the pistol ban in UK moved me out here.
I have an argentine mauser in .270 with a muzzle brake drilled around the first 2 inchs made by a New Mexico gunsmith as his own piece, shoots nice. Also use a savage 110 synthetic stock for boar here in Germany.
Whereabouts in the UK did you shoot the muntjac?

Offline Brithunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2538
Re: The .270 again.
« Reply #29 on: May 05, 2008, 09:44:45 AM »
Hi There,

      This last Muntjac was shot a few miles north of Aldermarston in Hampshire. However they are wide spread now and I have shot more of them near Northampton. My four 270's are all BSA's and consist of :-

CF2 Stutzen
Monarch 1st pattern x 2
Majestic Featherweight Deluxe

     I picked up the first Monarch for a song, £25 because it was not in the best condition. I think it was a keepers or forrestry Rangers rifle as all the bluing on the barrel from forestock tip to foresigt had gone. Typical of a landrover gun and the rifling is quite worn although it shoots quite well and is capable of grouping just over MOA and occasionaly under. Since then I came across a very good one at the Bisley show. A walk in but he could not get even on of the dealers to make an offer on it so a dealer I know pointed him in my direction. It's complete with it's fore sight hood which cost me £100. If it was chambered for anything but 270 Winchester it would have cost me more but of course 270 Winchester is out of favor here in the UK, not fashionable any more

      ::) ??? Oh well.