PJ = Woodpecker Lips. Now that is quite a handle you got there PJ.
On to the topic at hand. The Recoil calculation Forumla I have does indeed take into account Powder Charge. In fact in my cousin's Ruger 77 .338 WinMag we just went through a similar discussion. I told him that Powder Charge Weight did indeed make a difference in perceived recoil. The discussion went on to the point that given two powders (on opposite ends of the burning rates that were suitable for his cartridge) loaded to the same velocity, the faster burning powder (because it uses less powder) would produce less recoil. My cousin would not believe me, so he went to loading some ammo and chronographing. In the end he concluded that the recoil formula was correct. Now he loads his .338 with H-4895, is not giving up enough velocity to talk about, and it is much more shooter friendly.
The same should apply to the .308 vs .30-06 debate you are talking about. In my mind the .308 would make the most use of available bore capacity. There is only so much powder that can be burnt in a .30 Caliber Barrel 15" long.
Larry