Whoa again!! My post was "folks that get 100% (keep that figure in mind, we will refer back to it) bang flops have not shot very many deer or are shooting a different brand of deer than I do."
And then a couple of guys kinda picked up on it and kicked it around a little. Then **WHAM** the door busts open and you come galloping in on your fine white horse and gave us holy hell for being so low bred as to call people liars and make them feel bad about themselves. And generally made us feel bad about ourselves but that seemed okay with you so I said we were just kidding around.
Then you posted that you were addressing ONLY those people that had called you and others that "REGULARLY" (keep that word in mind, we will refer back to it) get B/F's a liar. Now then, on the one hand, if I've got a beef with someone, I don't have a problem calling them by name. I found a long time ago that when you address an office memo to "some people" or "only those" the folks that it's intended for never get the word.
Now, back to those isolated words. I think you'll agree that it's a looooong way from regularly to 100%. Hell, I get B/F's regularly. If I didn't, I'd change something about the way I hunt or what I hunt with. If I remember correctly, I voted for regularly. But not 100%. Two of the not 100% deer got up after being knocked down and ran a considerable distance with awesome wounds. So I still don't think there was anything wrong with what I said nor with anything the other guys said. Are you sure that stick ain't binding you?