Author Topic: model 97 44 special  (Read 1994 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline makilly

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 37
model 97 44 special
« on: June 17, 2008, 02:20:10 PM »
Looking for model 97 .44 special owner reviews. Thanks, makilly

Offline STJ

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 92
Re: model 97 44 special
« Reply #1 on: June 22, 2008, 02:51:12 PM »
Start looking a few pages back.  There has been discussion on the 44sp...

Offline Lloyd Smale

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (32)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18253
Re: model 97 44 special
« Reply #2 on: June 23, 2008, 12:15:54 AM »
no reviews but it will be my next FA gun!! Should be a perfect little package.
blue lives matter

Offline Broom Rider

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 256
  • Gender: Female
Re: model 97 44 special
« Reply #3 on: June 23, 2008, 01:10:53 PM »
I'd love to get a 97 in 44 special, it would go well with the other 44 specials.
Lynnie, NRA Life Member

Offline Ken ONeill

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1259
  • Gender: Male
Re: model 97 44 special
« Reply #4 on: June 24, 2008, 12:18:17 AM »
I had an early one with a 4 1/4" barrel. I settled on Speer 200 gr. JHP's, driven by 2400, with which it was nicely accurate, considering it's short sight radius. In the end, the barrel length didn't suit me, though, and I sold it after about a year. I prefer at least a 5 1/2" length, but obviously that's a personal thing.

Offline Bob96

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 139
Re: model 97 44 special
« Reply #5 on: July 25, 2008, 12:23:32 AM »
  Mine is a 4.25" with round butt. It is a sweet gun and fairly compact and good handling. I got the black micarda grips - jeweled hammer & trigger and octagon brl.  I really like this gun. Very mild to shoot with most regular 44spl. loads.

Offline fowler

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 128
Re: model 97 44 special
« Reply #6 on: July 25, 2008, 02:23:05 AM »
I think between the 45 colt (my personal favorite caliber in any revolver) and the 44sp the 44sp really works well in the 97. The cylinder is long enough to run most 44 cal bullets where you are pretty limited, or at least challenged with a lot of very good 45 cal bullets in the 45 colt to fit the short 1.60" cylinder. The gun is strong enough that any reasonable 44sp load ever developed will run in the gun. And if it does not shoot well it is the operator not the gun that is at fault.

I think I may have to get a 4.25" round butt gun someday and I might just have to make it the 44sp even though I am a 45 colt man through and through....

Offline makilly

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 37
Re: model 97 44 special
« Reply #7 on: August 11, 2008, 08:26:17 AM »
Thanks to all for your feedback. Best regards makilly

Offline tikka3006

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9
Re: model 97 44 special
« Reply #8 on: March 29, 2010, 12:57:12 PM »
I think between the 45 colt (my personal favorite caliber in any revolver) and the 44sp the 44sp really works well in the 97. The cylinder is long enough to run most 44 cal bullets where you are pretty limited, or at least challenged with a lot of very good 45 cal bullets in the 45 colt to fit the short 1.60" cylinder. The gun is strong enough that any reasonable 44sp load ever developed will run in the gun. And if it does not shoot well it is the operator not the gun that is at fault.

I think I may have to get a 4.25" round butt gun someday and I might just have to make it the 44sp even though I am a 45 colt man through and through....

I have just ordered my 1st FA,  A model 97 in .357.
But I was attracted to the 44 special and the 45 colt too.

Could somebody explain the reason more bullet options are available for the 97 in 44 special.

Offline c.r.

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 31
Re: model 97 44 special
« Reply #9 on: March 30, 2010, 10:17:03 AM »
the bullet selection issue has to do with the cylinder length of the mdl 97s.  

FA suggests max OAL of 1.6" for use in the 97's.  The 45Colt case is ~1.28", this leaves ~.32" for the "nose to crimp groove length" of the bullet.  The 44 spcl case is ~1.16" leaving ~.44" for the nose to crimp groove.  in most cases this limits the 97 in 45 to ~250gr SWC.  Usually most Keith style bullets won't fit the 97 in 45.  Most bullets with weights greater than 250 grains give trouble fitting in the 45's cylinder without trimming brass or crimping over driving bands.  this makes the number of 45Colt bullets with the required shorter nose to crimp groove length becomes a bit limited.  

44 bullets with nose to crimp groove lengths of <= .44 are a bit more common.  ~250 gr keiths do fit.  LFN LBTs will work.

SOME people let this subject sway them away from the 45.  

I chose the 44 spcl................HOWEVER, guess what i shoot in it? ~250 grain keiths.  is there really a difference between a ~250 gr. keith and a 250gr SWC out to ~50 yards?..........i doubt it.  second, you can find published "Ruger only loads" for the 97 in 45.  FA states the 97 will handle "Ruger Only Loads" published in popular reloading manuals as long as the OAL is <= 1.6"........for the 97 in 44, i'm trusting works like Keith, taffin, skeeter, peirce, etc.

I am 100 percent satisfied with my purchase.  Had I bought the 45Colt, i'm sure i would be just as happy.  At times i second guess myself and think i should have went with the slightly larger diameter 45 over the 44.  I doubt any animal would ever notice the difference though.  I know of no piece of paper or gong i've shot yet that has been able to tell me differently

I do suggest getting the factory action job.  it makes for one sweet little trigger.

I recently HELD a 3-1/2" 97 with the round butt.  Just kind of felt like something was missing while aiming it.  I'm happy i chose the regular butt.  It seems to fill out my hand a bit better and offer a bit more stability (probably all in my head though)............However I can see where the round butt would contribute to a 97 being a bit more comfortable/out of the way as a packing pistol.

This probably doesn't say much for my shooting prowness, but I shoot my 4-1/4" 97 just as poorly as I shoot any other revolver, up to 5-1/2" rugers. :o  Off hand, out to ~65 yards i miss the same gongs about the same number of times with the 97 as i do with other longer barreled revolvers.   ;)

To me, the 4-1/4" 97 balances great. it's a great gun and i haven't shot any of my other 44 spcls since receiving my 97 this past january (i believe it was january).

~c.r.