Author Topic: False advertising of "Confederate Armstrong Cannons"  (Read 3063 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline cannonmn

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3345
Re: False advertising of "Confederate Armstrong Cannons"
« Reply #30 on: July 10, 2008, 03:42:53 AM »
More info on the false "Confederate Armstrongs:"

Checking some detailed info I have, the group of cannons imported from Nepal ca. 2003 included eight rifled bronze mountain guns which were identical or nearly identical to the two shown in the online ad.  I am certain that the two shown in the ad are two from that group of eight.  These guns all have a very distinctive breech profile you can see in the pix.  One of the guns in the row of those 8 had the Nepalese royal coat of arms engraved on the breech.

Offline Double D

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12609
  • SAMCC cannon by Brooks-USA
    • South African Miniature Cannon Club
Re: False advertising of "Confederate Armstrong Cannons"
« Reply #31 on: July 10, 2008, 04:14:58 AM »
John, aren't you glad you posted details instead of a just a link!


Offline cannonmn

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3345
Re: False advertising of "Confederate Armstrong Cannons"
« Reply #32 on: July 10, 2008, 06:04:38 AM »
This board does seem to be a lot more active than the NSSA one, as far as active participation.  There are a lot of readers on the NSSA board, but they don't tend to make comments, interestingly enough.  I think there, the interests are more specifically Civil War.

Offline Cannoneer

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3950
Re: False advertising of "Confederate Armstrong Cannons"
« Reply #33 on: July 10, 2008, 10:01:48 AM »
Adrian,
After reading these posts the first names that came to mind were Bill Curtis and yours; if anyone has access to the literature on William Armstrong's history of cannon manufacturing it might be one of you two. Were Armstrong's ordnance companies ever involved with the casting of any bronze cannon or did they only produce wrought iron and steel ordnance?
RIP John. While on vacation July 4th 2013 in northern Wisconsin, he was ATVing with family and pulled ahead of everyone and took off at break-neck speed without a helmet. He lost control.....hit a tree....and the tree won.  He died instantly.

The one thing that you can almost always rely on research leading to, is more research.

Offline A.Roads

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 182
  • Gender: Male
Re: False advertising of "Confederate Armstrong Cannons"
« Reply #34 on: July 10, 2008, 12:14:09 PM »
Hi Boom J, a very interesting question - unfortunately I don't have anything with a history of Armstrong's gun manufacturing output so that is a difficult one for me to answer with certainty, but if you post it on the researchpress.co.uk forum I am sure that Bill Curtis will respond.  The references I have are more in regard to Armstrong's designs, patterns, manufacture, etc & relate to patterns adopted by the British Gov't - he didn't supply bronze guns to them as far as I am aware. Sir William Armstrong was a leading engineer in many areas other than ordnance & I find it difficult to imagine him casting bronze ordnance, he was seeking a modern solution, bronze had been around for centuries & its limitations were well known. If he wanted to experiment with rifled bronze guns then I believe that he would have rifled existing guns - as indeed was done by others. You could also post this query on the Palmerston Forts Society forum, there is a font of knowledge there. Adrian.

Offline Cat Whisperer

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7493
  • Gender: Male
  • Pulaski Coehorn Works
Re: False advertising of "Confederate Armstrong Cannons"
« Reply #35 on: July 11, 2008, 12:53:58 AM »
PUBLISH IT!   ;D
Tim K                 www.GBOCANNONS.COM
Cat Whisperer
Chief of Smoke, Pulaski Coehorn Works & Winery
U.S.Army Retired
N 37.05224  W 80.78133 (front door +/- 15 feet)

Offline cannonmn

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3345
Re: False advertising of "Confederate Armstrong Cannons"
« Reply #36 on: July 11, 2008, 01:16:40 AM »
If anyone still has any doubts that the "Confederate Armstrong Cannon" pictured above is actually one of the imported Nepalese cannons, look at these photos of the Nepalese cannons and judge for yourself.   If you have a way to zoom in on the darker cannon in the middle of the first photo, you can see the Nepalese royal coat of arms engraved on the breech.  I suspect this one is an un-converted smoothbore and that's why it retains the coat-of-arms, which was removed during the rifling conversion.  But I'm not sure of that, can't seem to find a picture taken from the muzzle end.  These photos were taken in 2004 not long after the Nepalese cannons showed up in this country.  Nor am I sure that the rifled guns are converted smoothbores, the data is not at my fingertips at the moment and this needs further research, if anyone cares that is.  Notice how the one to the right of the coat-of-arms gun has a quadrant flat machined into the top of the barrel, and both a front and rear sight.  The rear sight holder appears identical to those found on imported Afghan steel rifled mountain guns, so perhaps there's a connection back when.




Offline dominick

  • GBO Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (21)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1367
  • Gender: Male
    • Black Powder Cannons & Mortars
Re: False advertising of "Confederate Armstrong Cannons"
« Reply #37 on: July 11, 2008, 02:21:09 AM »
I built a few carriages for some of these barrels  and if I remember correctly there were approximately 140 barrels of various sizes imported from Nepal.


Offline cannonmn

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3345
Re: False advertising of "Confederate Armstrong Cannons"
« Reply #38 on: July 11, 2008, 04:34:04 AM »
Dom, just wondering if you ran into or heard about any of these Nepalese tubes being represented as English or American-made?

Offline Terry C.

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1215
  • Gender: Male
  • I see what you did there...
Re: False advertising of "Confederate Armstrong Cannons"
« Reply #39 on: July 11, 2008, 09:39:32 AM »
If you have a way to zoom in on the darker cannon in the middle of the first photo, you can see the Nepalese royal coat of arms engraved on the breech.

The forum software has greatly reduced the size of the photo. Opening the link in a separate window will allow it to display at its original dimensions.

Click here!


I couldn't help but notice the indention on the barrel with the front sight post. Do you know its purpose?

Offline dominick

  • GBO Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (21)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1367
  • Gender: Male
    • Black Powder Cannons & Mortars
Re: False advertising of "Confederate Armstrong Cannons"
« Reply #40 on: July 11, 2008, 03:07:08 PM »
Dom, just wondering if you ran into or heard about any of these Nepalese tubes being represented as English or American-made?

To answer your question, No.  Was Nepal a British colony in the early 19th century?  I can see someone thinking they were British because of that reason, even though they are of Nepalese manufacture.  The 6 pounder barrel That I built a carriage for has what appears to be a royal crest on the breech.  I made an impression of it.  It's written in the Nepalese language and I have not had it translated yet. 

Offline dan610324

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2413
  • Gender: Male
  • bronze cannons and copper stills ;-))
    • dont have
Re: False advertising of "Confederate Armstrong Cannons"
« Reply #41 on: July 11, 2008, 03:31:29 PM »
ooooooooooooooohhhh

who found this goldmine in nepal ???
Dan Pettersson
a swedish cannon maniac
interested in early bronze guns

better safe than sorry

Offline intoodeep

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (5)
  • A Real Regular
  • *****
  • Posts: 776
Re: False advertising of "Confederate Armstrong Cannons"
« Reply #42 on: July 11, 2008, 03:54:48 PM »
ooooooooooooooohhhh

who found this goldmine in nepal ???

Below is a link to a brief trailer video with that info. You can find more from there.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ffzjoj45Gzc&feature=related
If you make it idiot proof, then, someone will make a better idiot.


Offline Cannoneer

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3950
Re: False advertising of "Confederate Armstrong Cannons"
« Reply #43 on: July 12, 2008, 05:10:30 PM »
Thanks Adrian, I couldn't successfully complete the registration on the researchpress.co.uk forum; I'm waiting on a response from their webmaster to find out what the problem is. Palmerston Forts Society does have some information on Armstrong's cannons; there is a list of British service artillery of the Victorian period. There are two bronze R.M.L. pieces listed and they're not conversions.
7 PDR bronze Mark I (Land Service) introduced 1865 - sent to Bhutan.
7 PDR bronze Mark II (Naval Service) named the "Abyssinian Gun".
At the beginning of this list it's stated that, "N.B. this list does not include non-service issue artillery i.e. that manufactured and sold privately by Armstrong". After the British government relaxed (in the early 1860's) the restrictions in their agreement with Armstrong, which at one time prohibited him from selling artillery to any country but England; I think it might be reasonable to assume that at this time he may have manufactured other bronze rifled muzzle loaders for sale to foreign governments, he certainly took advantage of this opportunity to sell steel and wrought iron artillery to a divided America.
RIP John. While on vacation July 4th 2013 in northern Wisconsin, he was ATVing with family and pulled ahead of everyone and took off at break-neck speed without a helmet. He lost control.....hit a tree....and the tree won.  He died instantly.

The one thing that you can almost always rely on research leading to, is more research.

Offline KABAR2

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2830
Re: False advertising of "Confederate Armstrong Cannons"
« Reply #44 on: July 13, 2008, 01:03:15 AM »


I was able to enlarge the photo a bit only the one next to the one with the flat
over the trunnions has a crest. The rest seem to be unmarked.
Mr president I do not cling to either my gun or my Bible.... my gun is holstered on my side so I may carry my Bible and quote from it!

Sed tamen sal petrae LURO VOPO CAN UTRIET sulphuris; et sic facies tonituum et coruscationem si scias artficium

Offline cannonmn

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3345
Re: False advertising of "Confederate Armstrong Cannons"
« Reply #45 on: July 13, 2008, 01:37:46 AM »
Quote
I couldn't help but notice the indention on the barrel with the front sight post. Do you know its purpose?

It is what I call a quadrant flat or seat.  On a cylindrical barrel it is hard to put a quadrant on the barrel accurately and repeatably.  The flat seat solves that problem, you just set the quadrant on the same spot every time and you will get an accurate reading of quadrant elevation.  I generally only see them on breechloading guns but here's an exception.