We can each pick our scientists..I try to stay away from those that would receive a monetary benefit or financial grant if they could keep
the "global warming" myth alive. We see this sellout by "science" often, when multi million $$ grants are at stake. If you are old enough,
you should be able to remember "cranberries will give you cancer" scare, as well as the saccharine vs sugar scare, which came about from a
big financial grant by the Sugar Institute..to "study' the issue.
They greenies are of course, having trouble keeping the dog & pony show going, so we see their language changing..from "global warming" to
"climate change". Since the climate has been changing continually they cannot be caught in their original lie, something they have been
more in danger of with each passing month .
You have seen it as well as I have..in the last 3-4 months, the buzz-word has changed from global warming..to "climate change"...even the
Tenessee guru, Al Gore himself has adopted the term...
One can "pick their scientist" for the position they want to "prove"..Thusfar however, I have found the strongest backers of the global
warming myth to be scientists that an interest in renewing a financial grant to keep their work going..while those that say the global warming thing
is shameless hype are often very qualified scientists that have no governmental "money pig" to suckle upon.