The rest of us will use something proper for deer.
Spanky
Spanky, since you've already defined the .410 slug as "worthless" let's compare it to these 2 common handgun hunting
calibers which are legal in many states. From Federal's website:
Energy in Foot Pounds (To nearest 5 Foot Pounds)
Load No Caliber Muzzle 25 Y 50 Y 75 Y 100 Y
C357G 357 Magnum 466 439 416 396 378
Load No Caliber Muzzle 25 Y 50 Y 75 Y 100 Y
P41B 41 Rem. Magnum 747 696 653 616 585
Load No Caliber Muzzle 25 Y 50 Y 75 Y 100 Y
F412RS 410 762 574 432 334 272
Are these also worthless? How about an arrow from a bowhunter which typically has less than 50 foot pounds of energy? Would you consider an arrow proper for deer?
Also, are there any other rules of yours we should follow to make sure we are being "proper" for deer hunting?
Still apples to oranges my friend.
Both handguns fire a heavier projectile and will offer far better penetration.
The .410's energy figures are misleading as they are achieved by higher velocity than the handgun rounds.
If the .357 and .41 were fired from the same length barrel as the .410 slug you would see the difference.
Look at how much quicker the .410 sheds energy when compared to the others.
Horrible BC and light projectile weight means poor penetration as compared.
It's really simple if you think about it.
The numbers on the website might look good but in the real world...
On a positive note...
This little debate has urged me to dust off my little .410 and do some experimenting with handloaded slugs. If nothing else this might change my mind a little.
Do you guys have any recommendations on handloads??
I can't legally hunt deer with it but coyotes and other varmints are fair game.
Spanky
One other thing...
In no way did I mean to offend anyone with my other posts.
If I did...
I apologize.