Reasons to vote Democrat...

[ironglow]

>>
>> I'm voting Democrat because I'm way too irresponsible to own a gun,
>>> and I know that my local police are all I need to protect me from
>>> murderers and thieves.
>>>
>>> I'm voting Democrat because I love the fact that I can now marry
>>> whatever I want. I've decided to marry my cat.
>>>
>>> I'm voting Democrat because I believe oil companies' profits of 4%
>>> on a gallon of gas are obscene but the government taxing the same
>>> gallon of gas at 15% isn't.
>>>
>>> I'm voting Democrat because I believe the government will do a
>>> better job of spending the money I earn than I would.
>>>
>>> I'm voting Democrat because freedom of speech is fine as long as
>>> nobody is offended by it.
>>>
>>>  I'm voting Democrat because when we pull out of Iraq I trust that
>>> he bad guys will stop what they're doing because they now think
>>> we're good people.
>>>
>>> I'm voting Democrat because I believe that people who can't tell us
>>> if it will rain on Friday CAN tell us that the polar ice caps will
>>> melt away in ten years if I don't start driving a Prius.
>>>
>>> I'm voting Democrat because I'm not concerned about the slaughter of
>>> millions of babies, so long as we keep all death row inmates alive.
>>>
>>>  I'm voting Democrat because I believe that business should not be
>>> allowed to make profits for themselves. They need to break even and
>>> give the rest away to the government for redistribution as THEY see fit.
>>>
>>> I'm voting Democrat because I believe liberal judges need to rewrite
>>> the Constitution every few days to suit some fringe kooks who would
>>> NEVER get their agendas past the voters.
>>>
>>>  I'm voting Democrat because my head is so firmly planted up my ass
>>> it's unlikely that I'll ever have another point of view.
>>>
>>> 'A Liberal is a person who will give away everything they don't own'
>>
>



                   Barney Fag

[CannonKrazy]

We should all pitch in and have a billboard printed with that on it. Maybe someone would take notice.
It's still funny though.

[TribReady]

It's true, it makes me sick.....and yet, there's a ton of people in this country that are lock-step behind it 100%

It blows me away how flippin' stupid people are 

[JBlk]

You said a mouthfull, a sorry state of affairs.What happened to the Harry Truman's of the Democrat party.I hope the silent majority realise just how import en their votes are during this up coming election.

[bilmac]

Too bad it's too long for a bumper sticker.

[45-70.gov]

'' a liberal  is  a person that  will  give  away  every  thing  he does  not  own''


sums  it  up  and  will  fit a bumper sticker/hat/  t-shirt

[Singleshotsam]

I'd pitch in to have some made up...

[Heather]

A way to spread the word without any cost, would be via our internet.  Go to any forums you can find and post this topic there!  Email this to EVERYONE you know and ask them to pass it on!  Only takes time!

Heather

[Heavy C]

It's true, it makes me sick.....and yet, there's a ton of people in this country that are lock-step behind it 100%

It blows me away how flippin' stupid people are 

+1

Unfortunately it'll be too late before any, if any, realize exactly how crappy things are under a President Obama.

[ironglow]

  Heavy C;

   WEhat you mean.."president" Obama...Maybe real soon..we will be just like Kenya..where "elections" are sold ...and dictators are chosen for life !

[Graybeard]

What you gotta understand is that the laws are already in place forced thru by GWB to allow any sitting President to declare martial law on the flimsiest of excuses. That does several things immediately. It suspends Congress and the Sumpremes for six months and turns full and complete authority for all phases of government over to the pres. Do you honestly think that after six months of being a dictator anyone will then relenquish that power as long as they are alive? Do you know anyone who ever has yet?

The Constitution will be thrown aside for those six months and it will never be restored short of a full revolution and removal of the sitting dictator by force.

[deltecs]

What you gotta understand is that the laws are already in place forced thru by GWB to allow any sitting President to declare martial law on the flimsiest of excuses. That does several things immediately. It suspends Congress and the Sumpremes for six months and turns full and complete authority for all phases of government over to the pres. Do you honestly think that after six months of being a dictator anyone will then relenquish that power as long as they are alive? Do you know anyone who ever has yet?

The Constitution will be thrown aside for those six months and it will never be restored short of a full revolution and removal of the sitting dictator by force.

I'm not advocating violent revolution.  I'm prepared mentally and logistically for this event.  I will not tolerate a false or manufactured declaration of martial law for even 6 months.  If it is declared, this might be the perfect time for we, who believe in constructionist and Constitutional principles, to take back our government.  On Fox news this morning, the Presidential candidate from the Socialist party was interviewed.  His first comment was that the US was now a socialist country and needed someone in office with socialists principles that understood our direction.  Not for me.  Not to me.  Not by me.

[Troyboy]

What has happened to AMERICA?



                                                          Troy

[Elijah Gunn]

This is what happens when enough people within a nation reject God and His Word. I am not a prophet , but I think it is reasonable  to say that we are coming under the judgement of God.

[billy_56081]

I think another should be.

I am voting Democrat because I hate America, all it stands for and I want everyone to live in the same squalor as the third world nations.

[ironglow]

Elijah Gunn....Ditto...

[Matt]

This is the result of the lessor of two evils... time after time....

[SHOOTALL]

soap box - ballot box - ammo box

which one will you stand on ?

[buffermop]

If a dictatorship happened in the USA, it would not be too long before somebody took him out!

[SHOOTALL]

then his second in command gets scared and starts taking whole groups out . read some history it won't be fun .

[slim rem 7]

lets see how the election goes..either way its time for an organization that represents white america . its also time for white america conservatives to understand that we need what every other race has..
 an organization uncorrupted by nazisism , that is ready to go to bat forem if they get treated unfairly..if it happened we can be ready for the liberal media to lump  us togather with the exstremist ..... but not so.. this organization will be old time constitution believers, with one exception .. this organization will be about looking after white folks welfare an none allowed in but those who except this creed..every other race has this.. we need it also, to have big clout in govt ,local an national.. don t say john birchers .. havn t heard a thing from them..
 

[Heather]

lets see how the election goes..either way its time for an organization that represents white america . its also time for white america conservatives to understand that we need what every other race has..
 an organization uncorrupted by nazisism , that is ready to go to bat forem if they get treated unfairly..if it happened we can be ready for the liberal media to lump  us togather with the exstremist ..... but not so.. this organization will be old time constitution believers, with one exception .. this organization will be about looking after white folks welfare an none allowed in but those who except this creed..every other race has this.. we need it also, to have big clout in govt ,local an national.. don t say john birchers .. havn t heard a thing from them..
 

That's B.S.!!!  It is time for an organization that represents AMERICANS, who want to remain free with a very limited government, who is ready to go to bat for our liberty.  Screw the liberal media, We will be extremist.  We are old time constitution believers, with one exception, we won't need amendments to tell us that color is nothing more than color and ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL.  Americans need to stop going backwards and make changes for the better.  Let's not regress a half a century and make a save the whities group.  If any regressing is to be done regress back to 1776 when freedoms still meant something.  You guys continue to amaze me.

Heather

[Singleshotsam]

Ha ha... This goes back to the statement I made to Heather about starting a website, Young people against the 2 party system or something like that... maybe we could get Matt to help

[Heather]

Ha ha... This goes back to the statement I made to Heather about starting a website, Young people against the 2 party system or something like that... maybe we could get Matt to help

It will be a loooonnnngggg time before I'll be able to talk Matt into helping me with another site!  That will be all on you Sam!

Heather

[deltecs]

Here is the true reasons the uniformed public votes Democrat.  Read the article written by a staunch Democrat columnists and you will readily see how the American public has been brainwashed into liberalism.  Remember most journalists come from liberal arts colleges and taught by professors like William Ayers.  Why wouldn't they editorialize their journalistic expertise toward liberal views?

Would the last honest reporter
please turn on the lights?
By Orson Scott Card
Editor's note: Orson Scott Card is a Democrat and a newspaper columnist, and in this opinion piece he takes on both while lamenting the current state of journalism.

An open letter to the local daily paper almost every local daily paper in America:

I remember reading All the President's Men and thinking: That's journalism. You do what it takes to get the truth and you lay it before the public, because the public has a right to know.

This housing crisis didn't come out of nowhere. It was not a vague emanation of the evil Bush administration.

It was a direct result of the political decision, back in the late 1990s, to loosen the rules of lending so that home loans would be more accessible to poor people. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were authorized to approve risky loans.

What is a risky loan? It's a loan that the recipient is likely not to be able to repay.

The goal of this rule change was to help the poor which especially would help members of minority groups. But how does it help these people to give them a loan that they can't repay? They get into a house, yes, but when they can't make the payments, they lose the house  along with their credit rating.

They end up worse off than before.

This was completely foreseeable and in fact many people did foresee it. One political party, in Congress and in the executive branch, tried repeatedly to tighten up the rules. The other party blocked every such attempt and tried to loosen them.

Furthermore, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae were making political contributions to the very members of Congress who were allowing them to make irresponsible loans. (Though why quasi-federal agencies were allowed to do so baffles me. It's as if the Pentagon were allowed to contribute to the political campaigns of Congressmen who support increasing their budget.)

Isn't there a story here? Doesn't journalism require that you who produce our daily paper tell the truth about who brought us to a position where the only way to keep confidence in our economy was a $700 billion bailout? Aren't you supposed to follow the money and see which politicians were benefiting personally from the deregulation of mortgage lending?

I have no doubt that if these facts had pointed to the Republican Party or to John McCain as the guilty parties, you would be treating it as a vast scandal. "Housing-gate," no doubt. Or "Fannie-gate."

Instead, it was Senator Christopher Dodd and Congressman Barney Frank, both Democrats, who denied that there were any problems, who refused Bush administration requests to set up a regulatory agency to watch over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and who were still pushing for these agencies to go even further in promoting sub-prime mortgage loans almost up to the minute they failed.

As Thomas Sowell points out in a TownHall.com essay entitled "Do Facts Matter?": "Alan Greenspan warned them four years ago. So did the Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers to the President. So did Bush's Secretary of the Treasury."

These are facts. This financial crisis was completely preventable. The party that blocked any attempt to prevent it was ... the Democratic Party. The party that tried to prevent it was ... the Republican Party.

Yet when Nancy Pelosi accused the Bush administration and Republican deregulation of causing the crisis, you in the press did not hold her to account for her lie. Instead, you criticized Republicans who took offense at this lie and refused to vote for the bailout!

What? It's not the liar, but the victims of the lie who are to blame?

Now let's follow the money ... right to the presidential candidate who is the number-two recipient of campaign contributions from Fannie Mae.

And after Freddie Raines, the CEO of Fannie Mae who made $90 million while running it into the ground, was fired for his incompetence, one presidential candidate's campaign actually consulted him for advice on housing.

If that presidential candidate had been John McCain, you would have called it a major scandal and we would be getting stories in your paper every day about how incompetent and corrupt he was.

But instead, that candidate was Barack Obama, and so you have buried this story, and when the McCain campaign dared to call Raines an "adviser" to the Obama campaign because that campaign had sought his advice you actually let Obama's people get away with accusing McCain of lying, merely because Raines wasn't listed as an official adviser to the Obama campaign.

You would never tolerate such weasely nit-picking from a Republican.

If you who produce our local daily paper actually had any principles, you would be pounding this story, because the prosperity of all Americans was put at risk by the foolish, short-sighted, politically selfish, and possibly corrupt actions of leading Democrats, including Obama.

If you who produce our local daily paper had any personal honor, you would find it unbearable to let the American people believe that somehow Republicans were to blame for this crisis.

There are precedents. Even though President Bush and his administration never said that Iraq sponsored or was linked to 9/11, you could not stand the fact that Americans had that misapprehension so you pounded us with the fact that there was no such link. (Along the way, you created the false impression that Bush had lied to them and said that there was a connection.)

If you had any principles, then surely right now, when the American people are set to blame President Bush and John McCain for a crisis they tried to prevent, and are actually shifting to approve of Barack Obama because of a crisis he helped cause, you would be laboring at least as hard to correct that false impression.

Your job, as journalists, is to tell the truth. That's what you claim you do, when you accept people's money to buy or subscribe to your paper.

But right now, you are consenting to or actively promoting a big fat lie  that the housing crisis should somehow be blamed on Bush, McCain, and the Republicans. You have trained the American people to blame everything bad  even bad weather on Bush, and they are responding as you have taught them to.

If you had any personal honor, each reporter and editor would be insisting on telling the truth ­ even if it hurts the election chances of your favorite candidate.

Because that's what honorable people do. Honest people tell the truth even when they don't like the probable consequences. That's what honesty means. That's how trust is earned.

Barack Obama is just another politician, and not a very wise one. He has revealed his ignorance and naivete time after time and you have swept it under the rug, treated it as nothing.

Meanwhile, you have participated in the borking of Sarah Palin, reporting savage attacks on her for the pregnancy of her unmarried daughter while you ignored the story of John Edwards's own adultery for many months.

So I ask you now: Do you have any standards at all?  Do you even know what honesty means?

Is getting people to vote for Barack Obama so important that you will throw away everything that journalism is supposed to stand for?

You might want to remember the way the National Organization of Women threw away their integrity by supporting Bill Clinton despite his well-known pattern of sexual exploitation of powerless women. Who listens to NOW anymore?  We know they stand for nothing; they have no principles.

That's where you are right now.

It's not too late. You know that if the situation were reversed, and the truth would damage McCain and help Obama, you would be moving heaven and earth to get the true story out there.

If you want to redeem your honor, you will swallow hard and make a list of all the stories you would print if it were McCain who had been getting money from Fannie Mae, McCain whose campaign had consulted with its discredited former CEO, McCain who had voted against tightening its lending practices.

Then you will print them, even though every one of those true stories will point the finger of blame at the reckless Democratic Party, which put our nation's prosperity at risk so they could feel good about helping the poor, and lay a fair share of the blame at Obama's door.

You will also tell the truth about John McCain: that he tried, as a senator, to do what it took to prevent this crisis. You will tell the truth about President Bush: that his administration tried more than once to get Congress to regulate lending in a responsible way.

This was a Congress-caused crisis, beginning during the Clinton administration, with Democrats leading the way into the crisis and blocking every effort to get out of it in a timely fashion.

If you at our local daily newspaper continue to let Americans believe and vote as if President Bush and the Republicans caused the crisis, then you are joining in that lie.

If you do not tell the truth about the Democrats including Barack Obama and do so with the same energy you would use if the miscreants were Republicans then you are not journalists by any standard.

You're just the public relations machine of the Democratic Party, and it's time you were all fired and real journalists brought in, so that we can actually have a news paper in our city.   

Feel free to copy this open letter and send it to your newspaper and see who will print it.

[billy_56081]

Now if martial law were declared, at least for myself, I'd be up for something I consider very fun and exciting.

[S.S.]

Martial Law...
Enforced by whom?  Have any of you noticed the ages of some of the reservists being called up?
Uncle Sam is about to be running on empty as far as available soldiers.
And besides, every soldier I know absolutely Hates Obama! They would be more apt. to revolt than any civilians I know rather than serve that socialist!

[billy_56081]

I can't imagine the guys in the local Guard unit would go for enforcing this martial law. In fact I'm sure that both my kids who serve in the Mn guards would join the insurection against it.

[BBF]

What in he** is naziism? Do you even know what the abrv. stands for without looking it up?

[R.W.Dale]

Over half the Items on your list the republicans are no better on

Which just goes to show the sorry state of the republican democratLITE party. As bad as I hate to say it the Republicans DESERVE to lose this election......I'm just apprehensive that the stakes are so high