www.GBOReloaded.com
Home
Help
Articles
Classifieds
Login
Register
Graybeard Outdoors (GBO Reloaded)
»
H&R Talk
»
Huntsman and Sidekick Muzzle Loaders
(Moderator:
PHATINJUN
) »
NEF muzzleloaders treated as Legal "Firearms" or primitive muzzleloaders ?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: NEF muzzleloaders treated as Legal "Firearms" or primitive muzzleloaders ? (Read 980 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
preventec47
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Avid Poster
Posts: 172
NEF muzzleloaders treated as Legal "Firearms" or primitive muzzleloaders ?
«
on:
November 06, 2008, 03:15:22 AM »
I've noted some muzzleloaders are un regulated
and some are treated just like a new bolt action
rifle in ATF policies regarding sales etc.
What when and why ?
Logged
Swampman
GBO Supporter
Trade Count:
(
44
)
Senior Member
Posts: 16518
Gender:
Re: NEF muzzleloaders treated as Legal "Firearms" or primitive muzzleloaders ?
«
Reply #1 on:
November 06, 2008, 03:16:55 AM »
The Huntsman is a firearm. The Sidekick is a muzzleloader.
Logged
"Brother, you say there is but one way to worship and serve the Great Spirit. If there is but one religion, why do you white people differ so much about it? Why not all agreed, as you can all read the Book?" Sogoyewapha, "Red Jacket" - Senaca
1st Special Operations Wing 1975-1983
919th Special Operations Wing 1983-1985 1993-1994
"Manus haec inimica tyrannis / Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem" ~Algernon Sidney~
preventec47
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Avid Poster
Posts: 172
Re: NEF muzzleloaders treated as Legal "Firearms" or primitive muzzleloaders ?
«
Reply #2 on:
November 06, 2008, 03:35:05 AM »
WHY is there a difference ?
Logged
petemi
GBO Supporter
Trade Count:
(
73
)
Senior Member
Posts: 7386
Gender:
Re: NEF muzzleloaders treated as Legal "Firearms" or primitive muzzleloaders ?
«
Reply #3 on:
November 06, 2008, 04:01:29 AM »
Quote from: preventec47 on November 06, 2008, 03:35:05 AM
WHY is there a difference ?
I'll second that question. Why
I just got the answer.....called my dealer. He says if the barrel comes off and can be changed to a modern rifle or shotgun it is a firearm.
Logged
Keep both eyes open and make the first shot good.
The growing Handi/Sportster/Pardner/Topper Family: .22 WMR, .22-250. 223, Two Superlight 7mm-08s and one .243, .30-30, .308, 32-20, 18 inch .356/.358 Win., Two 16.5 inch .357 Max., 18 inch 38-55 BC Carbine, 16.5 inch .445 Super Mag., .45LC, 16.5 and 22 inch .45-70s, .50 Huntsman SS, .410, 20 ga., 12 ga., 20 ga. Pardner Pump, Versa-Pack .410 - .22
[size=7.4 pt]
PLEASE DONATE TO THE GBO SERVER FUND
We're closer to the goal but not there yet, we can still use more donations, thanks
http://www.gboreloaded.com/forums/index.php/topic,191112.msg1098959491.html#msg1098959491
Swampman
GBO Supporter
Trade Count:
(
44
)
Senior Member
Posts: 16518
Gender:
Re: NEF muzzleloaders treated as Legal "Firearms" or primitive muzzleloaders ?
«
Reply #4 on:
November 06, 2008, 04:32:48 AM »
The Sidekick cannot be fitted with a cartridge type barrel.
The Huntsman can.
Logged
"Brother, you say there is but one way to worship and serve the Great Spirit. If there is but one religion, why do you white people differ so much about it? Why not all agreed, as you can all read the Book?" Sogoyewapha, "Red Jacket" - Senaca
1st Special Operations Wing 1975-1983
919th Special Operations Wing 1983-1985 1993-1994
"Manus haec inimica tyrannis / Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem" ~Algernon Sidney~
OBXPilgrim
Trade Count:
(
5
)
Avid Poster
Posts: 204
Re: NEF muzzleloaders treated as Legal "Firearms" or primitive muzzleloaders ?
«
Reply #5 on:
November 06, 2008, 03:42:21 PM »
The reason why is that the Sidekick's hinge pin to breechface is much shorter than the Handi (Huntsman's) rifle pin to breechface length.
No one makes centerfire barrels that have the shorter hinge pin to breechface length like the Sidekick
Logged
Keith Lewis
Trade Count:
(
0
)
A Real Regular
Posts: 804
Re: NEF muzzleloaders treated as Legal "Firearms" or primitive muzzleloaders ?
«
Reply #6 on:
November 07, 2008, 08:43:02 AM »
Even if someone made a barrel that would fit the sidekick frame it would be illegal to install it as you would be bypassing the firearm regulations on selling a firearm. Since the sidekick action was not sold as a firearm making it into one would be a definate illegal act. The huntsman will accept shotgun barrels which makes it a "firearm". I bought one used and even though it did not have the shotgun barrel with it I had to fill out all the "firearm" paperwork.
Logged
Swampman
GBO Supporter
Trade Count:
(
44
)
Senior Member
Posts: 16518
Gender:
Re: NEF muzzleloaders treated as Legal "Firearms" or primitive muzzleloaders ?
«
Reply #7 on:
November 07, 2008, 10:27:16 AM »
I do not believe this to be true. You can legally convert a cap & ball revolver to use cartridges.
Logged
"Brother, you say there is but one way to worship and serve the Great Spirit. If there is but one religion, why do you white people differ so much about it? Why not all agreed, as you can all read the Book?" Sogoyewapha, "Red Jacket" - Senaca
1st Special Operations Wing 1975-1983
919th Special Operations Wing 1983-1985 1993-1994
"Manus haec inimica tyrannis / Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem" ~Algernon Sidney~
Keith Lewis
Trade Count:
(
0
)
A Real Regular
Posts: 804
Re: NEF muzzleloaders treated as Legal "Firearms" or primitive muzzleloaders ?
«
Reply #8 on:
November 08, 2008, 07:23:53 AM »
There are kits to do that but you need to check on the laws.
Logged
kevinsmith5
Trade Count:
(
4
)
Senior Member
Posts: 1274
Gender:
Re: NEF muzzleloaders treated as Legal "Firearms" or primitive muzzleloaders ?
«
Reply #9 on:
November 09, 2008, 02:34:23 PM »
They do sell the cylinders, but I'm guessing you better buy one soon if you wnat one. I expect them to go away with the gun shows sometime around January 20th, 2009.
Logged
If he's carrying a singleshot, don't expect a warning shot!
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Graybeard Outdoors (GBO Reloaded)
»
H&R Talk
»
Huntsman and Sidekick Muzzle Loaders
(Moderator:
PHATINJUN
) »
NEF muzzleloaders treated as Legal "Firearms" or primitive muzzleloaders ?