Author Topic: Which barrel: .204 or .223?  (Read 882 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline BillinOregon

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Avid Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 222
Which barrel: .204 or .223?
« on: December 13, 2008, 05:17:12 AM »
Just bought an Encore rifle frame and for the first barrel I am considering both the .204 Ruger and the .223. Which is likely to be the more accurate chambering in a TC barrel? I'm looking for half-inch five-shot groups at 100 yards with good handloads.

Offline skb2706

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1428
Re: Which barrel: .204 or .223?
« Reply #1 on: December 13, 2008, 05:34:57 AM »
I have both on a Contender format. I wouldn't even suggest one is inherently more accurate than the other. I do prefer the .204 and it will shoot along side nearly any bolt rifle. It is my first choice in prairie dog shooting.

Offline Ladobe

  • Trade Count: (91)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3193
Re: Which barrel: .204 or .223?
« Reply #2 on: December 13, 2008, 05:52:14 AM »
Lots of factors involved in shooting very small groups, and even more so with a slow action like the TC's.   But they can be overcome with technique and lots of practice.

All else being equal, the 204 will shoot flatter than the .223 giving it a slight edge for better possible precision.   However either is possible to get 1/2" groups out of with a custom barrel, well tuned loads, a tuned frame/trigger AND good shooting technique with this style of action.  It's also possible with factory barrels, although you'd have an easiler chance with custom barrels IMO.

I no longer own/shoot the Encores, but many of my tuned Contenders with premium barrels and tuned loads will easily average sub MOA, some 1/2 MOA or better more often than not.

IMO-YMMV

 
Evolution at work. Over two million years ago the genus Homo had small cranial capacity and thick skin to protect them from their environment. One species has evolved into obese cranial fatheads with thin skin in comparison that whines about anything and everything as their shield against their environment. Meus

Offline BillinOregon

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Avid Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 222
Re: Which barrel: .204 or .223?
« Reply #3 on: December 13, 2008, 03:22:44 PM »
Thanks guys.
Say, does anyone know what twist rate TC uses in its .223 and .204 barrels? Can't find it in their catalog. I want nothing slower than 1:9 in a .223.

Offline JustaShooter

  • Trade Count: (23)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1025
  • Gender: Male
Re: Which barrel: .204 or .223?
« Reply #4 on: December 13, 2008, 04:49:29 PM »
http://www.eabco.com/TwistRate.htm says that to the best of their knowledge, the TC factory barrels in 223 Rem have a 1:12 twist, as do the 204 Ruger barrels.

Just a Shooter
Christian, Husband, Father
NRA Life Member
NRA Certified Range Safety Officer

Anything I post in these forums is my personal opinion formed by my own interpretation of the topic.
IANAL and anything I say is not intended to be nor should it be taken as legal advice.

Offline encore3006

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 270
Re: Which barrel: .204 or .223?
« Reply #5 on: December 14, 2008, 03:24:50 AM »
 :-X

Offline BillinOregon

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Avid Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 222
Re: Which barrel: .204 or .223?
« Reply #6 on: December 14, 2008, 03:34:53 AM »
Thanks again guys. I had checked a TC catalog and their Web site and somehow managed not to find that twist chart.Guess I will be going to a custom barrel in .223, as I like shooting the 69-grain Match King and 75-grain A-Max for long-range work.

Offline Ladobe

  • Trade Count: (91)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3193
Re: Which barrel: .204 or .223?
« Reply #7 on: December 14, 2008, 04:08:01 AM »
... as I like shooting the 69-grain Match King and 75-grain A-Max for long-range work.

If you had provided that info up front you would have seen entirely different responses Bill.   Half a question - half an answer.   ;)

Evolution at work. Over two million years ago the genus Homo had small cranial capacity and thick skin to protect them from their environment. One species has evolved into obese cranial fatheads with thin skin in comparison that whines about anything and everything as their shield against their environment. Meus

Offline BillinOregon

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Avid Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 222
Re: Which barrel: .204 or .223?
« Reply #8 on: December 14, 2008, 10:26:29 AM »
Ladobe:
Point well taken.
After all this, I went out to the "office" this morning and bought a Pro Hunter stainless 28-inch .204 barrel, as I have not played with this round yet and have heard glowing reports of its mild behavior and excellent performance. Might just leave the .223 to a heavy-barreled Savage, as I know what those rifles can do at 600 yards.
Anyway, picked up WW brass, RCBS dies and some Hornady 32-grain V-Maxes. I think we all have a date with some Win 748 ...

Offline JustaShooter

  • Trade Count: (23)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1025
  • Gender: Male
Re: Which barrel: .204 or .223?
« Reply #9 on: December 14, 2008, 03:34:08 PM »
I had checked a TC catalog and their Web site and somehow managed not to find that twist chart.

Don't feel bad - I missed the twist rate chart on TC's site too, which is why I used the EABCo chart...

Just a Shooter
Christian, Husband, Father
NRA Life Member
NRA Certified Range Safety Officer

Anything I post in these forums is my personal opinion formed by my own interpretation of the topic.
IANAL and anything I say is not intended to be nor should it be taken as legal advice.