Author Topic: Yankee Myth # 5 - Race Relations In The Old South  (Read 4507 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dee

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23870
  • Gender: Male
Re: Yankee Myth # 5 - Race Relations In The Old South
« Reply #30 on: December 25, 2008, 02:59:01 AM »
Thanks for proving everyones point. As I said, it is turning into the Bible Study Forum only with different subject matter. We are to believe and hang on to his every word, because william KNOWS. ::) He doesn't need reference material and sources. HE IS THE ULTIMATE SOURCE.
Like I said earlier, it is becoming redundantly clear, that this forum will become williams. We aren't discussing Race Relations in the Old South. We're discussing "william" and his expert knowledge o ALL MATTERS.
See you guys later. ;)
You may all go to hell, I will go to Texas. Davy Crockett

Offline Ga.windbreak

  • Trade Count: (22)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 846
  • Gender: Male
Re: Yankee Myth # 5 - Race Relations In The Old South
« Reply #31 on: December 25, 2008, 09:54:42 AM »
Thanks for proving everyones point. As I said, it is turning into the Bible Study Forum only with different subject matter. We are to believe and hang on to his every word, because william KNOWS. ::) He doesn't need reference material and sources. HE IS THE ULTIMATE SOURCE.
Like I said earlier, it is becoming redundantly clear, that this forum will become williams. We aren't discussing Race Relations in the Old South. We're discussing "william" and his expert knowledge o ALL MATTERS.
See you guys later. ;)

You are so right, O wise and truthful master, I've fallen into the trap again. I will learn ;). Please be patient with me.

Merry Christmas Dan.
"Men do not differ about what
Things they will call evils;
They differ enormously about what evils
They will call excusable." - G.K. Chesterton

"It starts when you begin to overlook bad manners. Anytime you quit hearing "sir" and "ma'am", the end is pretty much in sight."-Tommy Lee Jones in No Country for Old Men

Private John Walker Roberts CSA 19th Battalion Georgia Cavalry - Loyalty is a most precious trait - RIP

Offline SouthernByGrace

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 378
  • Gender: Male
Re: Yankee Myth # 5 - Race Relations In The Old South
« Reply #32 on: December 26, 2008, 03:43:06 PM »
PART 3
Jefferson Davis' View of Slavery

   Jefferson Davis was influenced early in his life by his older brother, Joseph, who desired to improve the lot of man. Joseph was inspired by the writings of an English industrialist and social reformer, Robert Owen, the author of the book, A New View of Society. Owens' conception of a new society was based on fair and generous treatment of all people. This in itself was a revolutionary idea, with great potential for improving the lot of downtrodden industrial workers of the world. Joseph met and talked with Owens, and he made a determination to use Owens' approach on his Mississippi plantation. Joseph established as rules for the running of his plantation some of the most liberal regulations known to slavery.
   In an article from the Vicksburg Evening Post, Vicksburg, MS, June 28, 1985, the following description of life as a slave on the Davis plantation was printed:
   "The slave quarters exceeded what was considered ideal by the agricultural journals of the period. A variety of food was made available; in some cases with unlimited quantities. Davis even established a court system where a slave was not punished except upon conviction by a jury of his peers." (OTHER slaves) I guess he figured if that was a right guaranteed to whites, why couldn't it work for slaves just as well? Jefferson Davis patterned the conduct of his plantation after that of his older brother, Joseph.
   In the South at that time, there were several different views of slavery. From the extreme "Fire Eaters" who desired a continuation and extension of slavery, to those who, like Robert E. Lee, desired a quick end to the system. Like all other philosophies, the "peculiar institution" of slavery had a middle ground. It was here that men such as the Davis brothers stood. In Jefferson Davis' view, the system of slavery would have a natural end. For it to arrive at that natural end, the enlightened slave master had to prepare his "people" for freedom. Davis stated, " The slave must be made fit for his freedom by education and discipline and thus be made unfit for slavery." For this reason he attempted to "educate" his slaves in the ways of civilized society. On his plantation, Jefferson Davis instituted a system of slave laws, courts, and juries in an effort to improve the understanding of his slaves for what life under "freedom" would be like. As a very interesting side note, worthy of mentioning here, under Davis' legal system, he could not increase the punishment administered by the slave jury, but he Could pardon a convicted person, if he felt the punishment too harsh, or if he felt that person had already paid sufficiently for his offense.
   In view of how Davis' slaves were treated on his plantation, is it any wonder that so many blacks had such respect for Davis? When asked by a Yankee how he felt about Jefferson Davis, an elderly slave replied, "... I loved him, and I can say that every colored man he ever owned loved him." ... William Sampson, quoted in Confederate Veteran, November - December 1990, p. 18
   The deep respect and love that President and Mrs. Davis had for people is clearly shown in the story of little Jim Limber "Davis." Coming up next, join me in Part 4 as we discuss the Black Child in the Confederate White House.
   
"Let us cross over the river and rest under the shade of the trees..."
Final words spoken by Gen. Thomas J. (Stonewall) Jackson, CSA

Offline ironglow

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31342
  • Gender: Male
Re: Yankee Myth # 5 - Race Relations In The Old South
« Reply #33 on: December 26, 2008, 11:55:01 PM »
  Guys;
     You probably know very well that I don't often post upon this particular forum. Again, there are many things I like about the South (see, I even capitalized the word.. ;))  I am not familiar with the ongoing repartee here, and may have posted a bit ineptly..sorry! I last post I placed here was simply because having met William, I know him to be a real gentleman..in the Southern tradition .
   I truly believe that if everyone here could do some getting acquainted just as William and I have, we would all be great friends with much, much more to unite us than what could possibly divide us.
    In closing, may God Bless you all..and please read the post I put on the "prayer posse" forum this morning.
If you don't want the truth, don't ask me.  If you want something sugar coated...go eat a donut !  (anon)

Offline Dee

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23870
  • Gender: Male
Re: Yankee Myth # 5 - Race Relations In The Old South
« Reply #34 on: December 27, 2008, 02:22:01 AM »
Folks usually are much more polite in person than on the phone or Internet. It is out of necessity. In person, rudeness and name calling can have consequences. ;)
You may all go to hell, I will go to Texas. Davy Crockett

Offline Ga.windbreak

  • Trade Count: (22)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 846
  • Gender: Male
Re: Yankee Myth # 5 - Race Relations In The Old South
« Reply #35 on: December 27, 2008, 02:54:23 AM »
PART 3
Jefferson Davis' View of Slavery

   Jefferson Davis was influenced early in his life by his older brother, Joseph, who desired to improve the lot of man. Joseph was inspired by the writings of an English industrialist and social reformer, Robert Owen, the author of the book, A New View of Society. Owens' conception of a new society was based on fair and generous treatment of all people. This in itself was a revolutionary idea, with great potential for improving the lot of downtrodden industrial workers of the world. Joseph met and talked with Owens, and he made a determination to use Owens' approach on his Mississippi plantation. Joseph established as rules for the running of his plantation some of the most liberal regulations known to slavery.
   In an article from the Vicksburg Evening Post, Vicksburg, MS, June 28, 1985, the following description of life as a slave on the Davis plantation was printed:
   "The slave quarters exceeded what was considered ideal by the agricultural journals of the period. A variety of food was made available; in some cases with unlimited quantities. Davis even established a court system where a slave was not punished except upon conviction by a jury of his peers." (OTHER slaves) I guess he figured if that was a right guaranteed to whites, why couldn't it work for slaves just as well? Jefferson Davis patterned the conduct of his plantation after that of his older brother, Joseph.
   In the South at that time, there were several different views of slavery. From the extreme "Fire Eaters" who desired a continuation and extension of slavery, to those who, like Robert E. Lee, desired a quick end to the system. Like all other philosophies, the "peculiar institution" of slavery had a middle ground. It was here that men such as the Davis brothers stood. In Jefferson Davis' view, the system of slavery would have a natural end. For it to arrive at that natural end, the enlightened slave master had to prepare his "people" for freedom. Davis stated, " The slave must be made fit for his freedom by education and discipline and thus be made unfit for slavery." For this reason he attempted to "educate" his slaves in the ways of civilized society. On his plantation, Jefferson Davis instituted a system of slave laws, courts, and juries in an effort to improve the understanding of his slaves for what life under "freedom" would be like. As a very interesting side note, worthy of mentioning here, under Davis' legal system, he could not increase the punishment administered by the slave jury, but he Could pardon a convicted person, if he felt the punishment too harsh, or if he felt that person had already paid sufficiently for his offense.
   In view of how Davis' slaves were treated on his plantation, is it any wonder that so many blacks had such respect for Davis? When asked by a Yankee how he felt about Jefferson Davis, an elderly slave replied, "... I loved him, and I can say that every colored man he ever owned loved him." ... William Sampson, quoted in Confederate Veteran, November - December 1990, p. 18
   The deep respect and love that President and Mrs. Davis had for people is clearly shown in the story of little Jim Limber "Davis." Coming up next, join me in Part 4 as we discuss the Black Child in the Confederate White House.
   

Thanks, a fact that I was unaware of until your post.

In Jeff's case there was no whippings of any of his slaves and his overseer was himself a slave. Jeff's only involvment with his "court" was to overrule any punishment he felt to harsh.
"Men do not differ about what
Things they will call evils;
They differ enormously about what evils
They will call excusable." - G.K. Chesterton

"It starts when you begin to overlook bad manners. Anytime you quit hearing "sir" and "ma'am", the end is pretty much in sight."-Tommy Lee Jones in No Country for Old Men

Private John Walker Roberts CSA 19th Battalion Georgia Cavalry - Loyalty is a most precious trait - RIP

Offline littlecanoe

  • Trade Count: (14)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2842
Re: Yankee Myth # 5 - Race Relations In The Old South
« Reply #36 on: December 27, 2008, 06:13:26 AM »
SBG,  didn't mean to steal any thunder by the other thread.  I really wanted to keep it in a present perspective but I guess the past influences the present too much to separate the two.

Gents, here I'll introduce thought from another thread, I am seeking to be balanced in my understanding of what happened.  I appreciate all of the admonishments and thank you for your efforts to help me see the bigger picture.  I will admit that most of my perceptions have been based upon all the negative things that have been reported over the years. 

Squirrellluck, I appreciate your post.  You really gave evidence of the two sides from personal experience.  I'd have to agree that moving from GA in 1998 to northern New Jersey I saw just as much racism there and actually heard remarks from the general population that I never heard in Gordon Co GA; Calhoun and the surrounding area.

On the side, the observations about respect being shown are well received.  I didn't grow up using the terms sir, ma'am, Uncle, Aunt.  I'm trying to instill those habits in my children as I see that common respect for others is a missing part of our culture.  The Old south had that for sure!

Offline squirrellluck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 642
Re: Yankee Myth # 5 - Race Relations In The Old South
« Reply #37 on: December 27, 2008, 06:51:35 AM »
Good for you lc From experience its a hard row to hoe. But when they are grown they will appreciate your efforts and find more opportunities due to their manners and respect.

Offline SouthernByGrace

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 378
  • Gender: Male
Re: Yankee Myth # 5 - Race Relations In The Old South
« Reply #38 on: December 27, 2008, 07:13:36 AM »
littlecanoe, maybe this link can give you some kind of understanding of how race relations actually were, as experienced by one that was there. This interview was recorded in 1941, and is the actual voice of 88 year old Isom Moseley, a former slave from Gee's Bend, Alabama. The interview took place in his home and you can hear his great grandchildren in the background.

This is one of the best examples of first-hand experience you will ever find. This man relates to us his feelings of how he was treated as a slave, how he has been treated after freedom, and how he is being treated to the present day of the interview. In this man's own words, he describes his opinion of his masters and his "mistusses", as the master of the plantation's immediate family also held ownership in the slaves. Not only does he tell what HE thought of them, he says it three times, and also tells of what other blacks thought of them after freedom, as well.

You want to hear of personal experiences, then give this a listen:

http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/h?ammem/afcesnbib:@field(DOCID+@lit(afcesn000014))


If this link does not work, PM me and I'll give you a step by step how to get to it, and others like it.

There are those who rely solely on opinions to formulate their beliefs. Will they doubt the very words of someone who is much better qualified to tell how it Really was and Really is?   Probably. :-\  But that's the saddest part of it all. Just because the corner of the world in which they were raised was the stereotypical Racial Hatred community, that by no means indicates life was like that everywhere else. As noted by others in this thread, as well as yours, none of us experienced that sort of behavior. I, for one, am very thankful for it, too. None of us have ever denied these things happened, they just didn't happen in OUR corners of the world.

I agree with Graybeard and Dee 100% in that the problems of Southern race relations were brought on by Northern influence. People who, by far, had a predetermined notion of how things were down here, just as in the War. I have already given evidence of this in earlier posts, and it wasn't my opinion, but the words of the people that were there.

DEO VINDICE
"Let us cross over the river and rest under the shade of the trees..."
Final words spoken by Gen. Thomas J. (Stonewall) Jackson, CSA

Offline Ga.windbreak

  • Trade Count: (22)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 846
  • Gender: Male
Re: Yankee Myth # 5 - Race Relations In The Old South
« Reply #39 on: December 30, 2008, 01:41:34 AM »
Now that I'm mid way thru the RE Lee book. The question of his treatment of his slaves seems to be at odds with what we seem to feel we know about Lee. Yet the author puts forth her personal feelings IMHO to some extent and that is at odds with some of what she writes when she later states that Lee helped some of his former slaves when it seems that they were being mistreated after being freed. To expect him to be a saint esp with a war going on seems, to me, to be a little much to be honest. Lee was a man of his times and I think to judge him otherwise is at least unfair and at most naive.
"Men do not differ about what
Things they will call evils;
They differ enormously about what evils
They will call excusable." - G.K. Chesterton

"It starts when you begin to overlook bad manners. Anytime you quit hearing "sir" and "ma'am", the end is pretty much in sight."-Tommy Lee Jones in No Country for Old Men

Private John Walker Roberts CSA 19th Battalion Georgia Cavalry - Loyalty is a most precious trait - RIP

Offline ironglow

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31342
  • Gender: Male
Re: Yankee Myth # 5 - Race Relations In The Old South
« Reply #40 on: December 30, 2008, 03:54:49 PM »
 I must admit that I try to judge each person I meet by his own character rather than what might be ascribed to his group by others, I do think that is fair. That leads me to the next position..from all I have read & learned, considering intelligence, character, ability and courage..probably Lee and Jackson were the greatest of the generals that war produced. There was both greatness and ineptness on both sides, but Lee & Jackson seem to epitomise greatness in general officers.
  Another favorite of mine is Col. Josh Chamberlain of the 20th Maine, hero of Little Round top...another great one.
If you don't want the truth, don't ask me.  If you want something sugar coated...go eat a donut !  (anon)

Offline Ga.windbreak

  • Trade Count: (22)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 846
  • Gender: Male
Re: Yankee Myth # 5 - Race Relations In The Old South
« Reply #41 on: December 30, 2008, 07:25:11 PM »
ironglow - I feel as you do in my assessment of people. I feel we all have good and bad points and thats what makes us who we are.

Now as to Lee and Jackson, as well as some others, there were true innovators during that time in our history. If you look at all the inventions that came about as well as new and innovative tactics. West Point really was way ahead of its time and most of those men were way above the norm, they were the cream of our nation. Chamberlain was not from that group but he was a truly courageous man.

Honor had a much different meaning to those men, if you remember those were the times men fought duels. Jeff Davis was not above calling someone out yet he was a soft hearted man who could not hold a grudge.

That is also why I feel that when we talk about slavery of the 1650's-1850's it needs to be put in its proper context. Racism as we know it today was not the same back then. I say that knowing full well that some will misconstrue my remarks; I'm not excusing slavery because as we sit here today there is no excuse. Then it was an excepted way of life that most felt was wrong but they were at a loss to solve the problem. By freeing them the way they did did more harm than good IMHO and we are still living thru that today.
"Men do not differ about what
Things they will call evils;
They differ enormously about what evils
They will call excusable." - G.K. Chesterton

"It starts when you begin to overlook bad manners. Anytime you quit hearing "sir" and "ma'am", the end is pretty much in sight."-Tommy Lee Jones in No Country for Old Men

Private John Walker Roberts CSA 19th Battalion Georgia Cavalry - Loyalty is a most precious trait - RIP

Offline Dee

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23870
  • Gender: Male
Re: Yankee Myth # 5 - Race Relations In The Old South
« Reply #42 on: December 31, 2008, 01:31:00 AM »
Racism is today what it is, for the same reasons it was what it was POST War. A group of people from another region TRYING TO IMPOSE, their way of doing things on another group of people from another region.
Example: Many from Dallas have moved the 50 miles north to my little community to "get away from the city hustle and bussel and crime". So what do they do when they get here? They start trying to change our rules and customs to SUIT THEM!
They try to transform what they moved TO, into what the moved FROM. Result? Conflict!
Another example: This is a farming-ranching area. A greedy landowner sold off a parcel of land to build house along a county road. I mean NICE houses. IMMEDIATE Conflict! One home owner went out and told a farmer friend of mine. "You can't plow at night, I can't sleep listening to you equipment". Another home owner went out and told him. "You can't plow during the day, I work shift work. ???
They wanted to live in the country, without knowing ANYTHING about the country. It is no different with racism. One group telling another group, from another region. Your getting screwed around by your neighbors, and we'll come down and help you straighten them out. We'll help you get started on the project, and then we'll go back home.
What they really mean is: We'll help you stir things up, and then we'll leave. That is EXACTLY WHAT THE NORTH DID, AND "IS" DOING. :) >:(
These young men down here that are so angry, HAVE NEVER SUFFERED RACISM, all they have is agitator stories, to stir them up.
You may all go to hell, I will go to Texas. Davy Crockett

Offline ironglow

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31342
  • Gender: Male
Re: Yankee Myth # 5 - Race Relations In The Old South
« Reply #43 on: December 31, 2008, 04:14:12 AM »
Dee, you have hit a real sore spot with me! I agree entirely with you on your observations. So often people will move from city to country to "get away from the city". Than they try to bring the city with them..rules, regulations, can't stand the noise of farm machinery, hate the smell of cows or horses. They put posted signs every few feet on their 1/2 acre...and then want to hike, picnic or birdwatch or even cut trees on everyone else's land.
  My brother tells me a story about Luke A.F.B. near Phoenix. Luke used to be out by itself but in the last few decades the area has built up. He showed me a letter sent to the base commander complaining about a couple F-16s flying low over a shopping mall..disturbing shoppers. The Col. that answered took the complainer to task..explaining that the F16s were part of a flyover, honoring a fallen F16 pilot, on return of his body.
   I wonder if the complainer even understood..after all, the Air Base was there before the town was built and these dummies knew it was there.
  We see the same city-to-country thing here and my old Army buddy from Vermont has seen it even worse
If you don't want the truth, don't ask me.  If you want something sugar coated...go eat a donut !  (anon)

Offline littlecanoe

  • Trade Count: (14)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2842
Re: Yankee Myth # 5 - Race Relations In The Old South
« Reply #44 on: December 31, 2008, 12:24:06 PM »
Gentlemen,

The last three posts roll together like waves in the ocean.  Thank you for expressing those thoughts.  It brings together some of what these posts have been trying to get at but in a easy way to understand. 

We can look at another example.  We see our Federalist mentality with a strong central government.  We understand that it is corrupt and that it doesn't perform as it was intended.  We see ourselves as helpless and committed to this course of government.  No generation has been exempt from Evil/Sin.  We just face different battlegrounds with successive generations.

Offline ironglow

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31342
  • Gender: Male
Re: Yankee Myth # 5 - Race Relations In The Old South
« Reply #45 on: December 31, 2008, 11:40:08 PM »
True;
  There are all kinds of slavery. The major slavery we deal with today is government beaurocracy..who earn no money, and produce no product..but leech vampirically, off those who do..
If you don't want the truth, don't ask me.  If you want something sugar coated...go eat a donut !  (anon)

Offline Dee

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23870
  • Gender: Male
Re: Yankee Myth # 5 - Race Relations In The Old South
« Reply #46 on: January 02, 2009, 03:33:25 AM »
True;
  There are all kinds of slavery. The major slavery we deal with today is government beaurocracy..who earn no money, and produce no product..but leech vampirically, off those who do..

A truer statement was never made. ;)
You may all go to hell, I will go to Texas. Davy Crockett

Offline SouthernByGrace

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 378
  • Gender: Male
Re: Yankee Myth # 5 - Race Relations In The Old South
« Reply #47 on: January 02, 2009, 06:41:23 PM »
PART 4
Black Child In The Confederate White House

   Jim Limber was an orphaned black child whom Mrs. Varina Davis rescued from an abusive guardian. Jim Limber was "adopted" by the Davis family and he became an integral part of the Davis family while they were in Richmond.
   While traveling through Richmond, Mrs. Davis saw a Negro man beating a child (Jim). She at once went to Jim's rescue and brought him to the Confederate White House for care. The following day, she had the appropriate papers registered at City Hall in Richmond to insure Jim's status as a free person of color. It is believed that President Jefferson Davis personally filed the papers to ensure it was done properly. A long time friend of the Davis family, Mrs. Mary Boykin Chesnut, wrote in her diary of seeing little Jim the day following his rescue. She stated that "The child is an orphan Mrs. Davis rescued yesterday from his brutal negro guardian. He was proudly dressed up in little Joe's clothes and happy as a lord. He was very anxious to show me his wounds and bruises [given to him by his former guardian].
   From the time little Jim was "adopted" by the Davises, he was treated as one of the family. Even in letters, the family would speak fondly of Jim. In one letter written by ten-year-old Maggie to her brother Jeff, she states, "Jim Limber sends his love to you." Many people reported how happy Jim was with life at the Confederate White House. Unfortunately for all, the war was coming to a sad end, and with that the happy life of Jim.
   After the fall of Richmond, the Davis family tried to make their way across the South beyond the Mississippi River. Near Irwinville, Georgia, President Davis and his family were taken prisoner. Varina Davis told of the sufferings of the next few days by all members of the family, including little Jim. Mrs. Davis was horrified by the statement of Union Captain Charles T. Hudson who threatened to take little Jim away and make him his own. Mrs. Davis states, "[Capt. Hudson], an extremely rude and offensive man, threatened to take Jim Limber away from us... and keep him as his own." When Jim learned he was being taken away, he put up one heck of a fight, clinging to the Davis children, screaming and begging to be left with his "family." But pleas of mercy had done little to stem the tide of infamy that had been poured upon the South over four years of war, and such pleas could do little now, even coming from a little boy. The Davises were told Jim would be taken to Washington. Northern papers ran stories of "Jim Limber, one of Jefferson Davis' slaves" who they said would carry scars on his back from the beatings given to him by the Davis family. Mrs. Davis denied that Jim was ever beaten by any member of the Davis family, "...for the affection was mutual between us, and we had never punished him." None of these statements ever made any headlines. After all, the Northern press had their own agenda to pursue, and telling the truth about Jim would not further that agenda.
   Other than a few stories in Northern newspapers, the Davis family was never again able to establish contact with Jim Limber. No One to this day has revealed what became of him. As late as 1890, Varina Davis said they still prayed for Jim and hoped that "...lovable little Jim Limber has been successful in the world."
   Nothing in the historic culture of the South could have been a bigger slap in the face of the Yankee myth-makers than the Confederate President's family informally adopting a black child and raising and nurturing him as one of their own. No other event of that day could have been more powerful to dispel the preconceived notions Northerners had of race relations in the South.
   In life, the Davis family displayed a genuine love for the people given to their care. That love was returned and displayed on the occasion of the death of the former president. Join me next time, for Part 5, as we take a look at the death of Jefferson Davis, and how blacks reacted to it.

DEO VINDICE

 
"Let us cross over the river and rest under the shade of the trees..."
Final words spoken by Gen. Thomas J. (Stonewall) Jackson, CSA

Offline Ga.windbreak

  • Trade Count: (22)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 846
  • Gender: Male
Re: Yankee Myth # 5 - Race Relations In The Old South
« Reply #48 on: January 02, 2009, 10:04:42 PM »
Jim Limber



Another link that gives a true insight in this great American.

http://michaelgriffith1.tripod.com/jeffersondavis.htm

Quote
Without question he respected individual blacks and in turn received their respect. His dealings with his slave James Pemberton and with Ben Montgomery as both a slave and a freedman illustrate such a relationship. Inviting Davis to attend the Colored State Fair in Vicksburg in 1886, Montgomery's son Isaiah said he knew Davis would have an interest "in any Enterprise tending to the welfare and development of the Colored people of Mississippi." "We would be highly pleased to have you here," Isaiah Montgomery asserted, and he closed "with best wishes for your continued preservation."48

and this:

Quote
Another one of Davis's former slaves, Robert Brown, fiercely defended Davis after the war. In one instance, Brown was traveling with Mrs. Davis and the children on a ship headed to New York, when a Northern man approached one of the Davis children and began to attack Davis's character. Brown became so angry that he punched the man. The captain of the ship was called, and when he heard the full story of the incident, he said Brown's action was justified and demanded an apology from the Northerner.51

Robert Brown

"Men do not differ about what
Things they will call evils;
They differ enormously about what evils
They will call excusable." - G.K. Chesterton

"It starts when you begin to overlook bad manners. Anytime you quit hearing "sir" and "ma'am", the end is pretty much in sight."-Tommy Lee Jones in No Country for Old Men

Private John Walker Roberts CSA 19th Battalion Georgia Cavalry - Loyalty is a most precious trait - RIP

Offline SouthernByGrace

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 378
  • Gender: Male
Re: Yankee Myth # 5 - Race Relations In The Old South
« Reply #49 on: January 03, 2009, 06:06:02 PM »
Thanks for the photos, GW. I was going to post them in part 5, but this way, we can go ahead and see who we're talking about. ;) ... put a face with the name, if you will. As far as I know, this is the Only picture ever taken of Jim Limber.
"Let us cross over the river and rest under the shade of the trees..."
Final words spoken by Gen. Thomas J. (Stonewall) Jackson, CSA

Offline Ga.windbreak

  • Trade Count: (22)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 846
  • Gender: Male
Re: Yankee Myth # 5 - Race Relations In The Old South
« Reply #50 on: January 03, 2009, 07:57:38 PM »
Dang, SBG, I didn't mean to steal your thunder, sorry. :-[ ;) I got those two photos from the ones in the Book you just got. I didn't know it was the only one of Jim, though.
"Men do not differ about what
Things they will call evils;
They differ enormously about what evils
They will call excusable." - G.K. Chesterton

"It starts when you begin to overlook bad manners. Anytime you quit hearing "sir" and "ma'am", the end is pretty much in sight."-Tommy Lee Jones in No Country for Old Men

Private John Walker Roberts CSA 19th Battalion Georgia Cavalry - Loyalty is a most precious trait - RIP

Offline wncchester

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3856
  • Gender: Male
Re: Yankee Myth # 5 - Race Relations In The Old South
« Reply #51 on: January 04, 2009, 12:32:42 PM »
"A great question to explore would be when did racial tensions become a problem?  Is there a point in history where some catalyst made this an issue or was it a slowly building pressure?  Were these tensions regional or sub-regional?"

lc, instead of spoon feeding you data that our friend Willim would dispute, let me ask you a few questions directly related to your questions of when, where and how did today's relations arise.  And let me note that while we are all entitled to our opinon, we are not entiteled to our own facts!  Facts is facts, opinons aint facts!

1.  Did you know the biggest and bloodiest race riots of the 60s/70s occured in the "liberal" cities of Boston, Detroit, NY, Phillidelphia, DC, LA, Chicago?  Do you know there were NO riots of such magnitude in the south?  Small events yes, some scattered bloody incidents yes, and almost all of those with the "help" of loads of visitors bussed in from the north.  (That's a fact, not a guess. I watched the busses unload in Biloxi, MS, each weekend for a couple of months).  I ask YOU, why those masses of "kindly treated" nothern blacks were so furious and murderous if it was the south that mistreated blacks so badly?

2.  Did you know that those "freed" slaves who traveled north after the War of Northern Agression were ignored, unhired, unfed, abandoned and run out of the "kindly" northern towns to stave or freeze alone in the forests?  All that up there, while in the south both blacks and whites worked together to raise enough food to keep them all from starving to death - not always successfully  - after the northern army had ripped off the meager food supplies in the south, killed the livestock and took away the horses and mules the sustinace farmers, black and white, needed to plow the fields?  Men and women, black and white, old and young pulled ploughs like animals to till the soil and hope to survive until the pitifully few crops came in.  Literal starvation was the lot of many.  Now, if all this were not true, why would southerners, black and white, have been left with such a deep instutional bitterness against the north?  Surely, the war alone is not enough to explain that, is it?

3.   If the south had been as beastly to  blacks as the north - and William - makes our ancestors to have been, would not the freed slaves have attacked and killed most, if not all, of their former masters?  But, that didn't happen, instead, by far most of them stayed right where they felt safe and all of them, black and white, worked together to survive in spite of the theft of most of the means to survive by the blue suits and carpet baggers.  If that is not true, how could you expain the way things worked out so peacefully in the long years following the war and rape of the south's economy, and so many of it's women, black and white, by the yankee "liberators"? 

4.  If the south was as abusive as today's students are taught to believe, how can it be explained that there were, in fact, quite a few blacks who volunteered, not conscripted, to serve in the Confederate armys?

That's by no means all, but it's enough food for thought for now! 

Just understand that most of the black vs. white anger in the south has occured within the life times of me, Graybeard, and even William, due to the efforts of a few black "leaders", largely for personal enrichment!  I offer you Jessie Jackson, Al Sharpton, Maxine Waters, Cynthia McKinney, etc.  I think they would be completely out of "work" if race relations improved tomorrow.  Am I right or wrong?  If I'm right, do you really think they are working for racial harmony or pray and work for continued, even intensified, racial strife?

Cheers!
Common sense is an uncommon virtue

Offline littlecanoe

  • Trade Count: (14)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2842
Re: Yankee Myth # 5 - Race Relations In The Old South
« Reply #52 on: January 04, 2009, 03:46:17 PM »
wn,

good for thought!

Your first two paragraphs, well, your post, is where I was trying to go.  You stated that very well!

Offline Bob Riebe

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7484
Re: Yankee Myth # 5 - Race Relations In The Old South
« Reply #53 on: January 04, 2009, 04:33:00 PM »

2.  Did you know that those "freed" slaves who traveled north after the War of Northern Agression were ignored, unhired, unfed, abandoned and run out of the "kindly" northern towns to stave or freeze alone in the forests? 

Do you have proof of this?
It is amazing that in liberal Minn. none of these stories have come to life yet, sounds like bs to me.

When my mother's parents moved up here from Nebraska in the twenties, one of the farmers in the area they moved to, about as close to lily white as can be,(Nordlanders, British, French etc.) one successful farm family was negro, and all the stories about them are positive.
Could you tell when they were driven off of their farm and had to live in the "forest"?
Bob
PS--So you are saying all the stories told by WWII black soldiers about how they were treated in the South are lies, please tell me which cafes in Minn, told blacks they could not eat with the good white folks.

Offline Ga.windbreak

  • Trade Count: (22)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 846
  • Gender: Male
Re: Yankee Myth # 5 - Race Relations In The Old South
« Reply #54 on: January 04, 2009, 06:38:38 PM »

2.  Did you know that those "freed" slaves who traveled north after the War of Northern Agression were ignored, unhired, unfed, abandoned and run out of the "kindly" northern towns to stave or freeze alone in the forests? 

Do you have proof of this?
It is amazing that in liberal Minn. none of these stories have come to life yet, sounds like bs to me.

Not saying you are wrong about what you know to be so but if its proof that you want you might want to read this. It tells a much different story.

http://www.slavenorth.com/exclusion.htm

Quote

"[R]ace prejudice seems stronger in those states that have abolished slavery than in those where it still exists, and nowhere is it more intolerant than in those states where slavery was never known." --Alexis De Tocqueville, “Democracy in America”


Were there Jim Crow laws inacted after reconstruction in the South, yes there were, but only because of Reconstruction and the exclusion of civil liberties to white southerners during that time. Was it right, no it wasn't, two wrongs never make a right.

Its funny to me, though, that whenever you hear of a racial problem its always happening in the North or the West. I wonder just why that is?
"Men do not differ about what
Things they will call evils;
They differ enormously about what evils
They will call excusable." - G.K. Chesterton

"It starts when you begin to overlook bad manners. Anytime you quit hearing "sir" and "ma'am", the end is pretty much in sight."-Tommy Lee Jones in No Country for Old Men

Private John Walker Roberts CSA 19th Battalion Georgia Cavalry - Loyalty is a most precious trait - RIP

Offline wncchester

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3856
  • Gender: Male
Re: Yankee Myth # 5 - Race Relations In The Old South
« Reply #55 on: January 05, 2009, 04:35:21 AM »
(1) Do you have proof of this?  It is amazing that in liberal Minn. none of these stories have come to life yet, sounds like bs to me.

(2) When my mother's parents moved up here from Nebraska in the twenties, one of the farmers in the area they moved to, about as close to lily white as can be,(Nordlanders, British, French etc.) one successful farm family was negro, and all the stories about them are positive.

(3) Could you tell when they were driven off of their farm and had to live in the "forest"?
Bob

(4) PS--So you are saying all the stories told by WWII black soldiers about how they were treated in the South are lies, please tell me which cafes in Minn, told blacks they could not eat with the good white folks."

Bob, I think you and I have touched on your history lesson of race relations in Minn. before.  What I said then still stands; Minn was never a cross-roads of black immigration and its record is no more applicable than say, N.D.'s.  Even so, mostly for lc's benefit, I will address your issues as I've numbered them.

1.  I think it is unlikely that ANY such history would be written and certainly none handed down verbally.  It would be astonishing if it were, not that it is not.   And, you may note that none of the cities of black unrest I mentioned, then or now, included Minneapolis.  Thus, your memories of Minn are not applicable to the issues in question but you may want to check a little further south, say Chicago or Detroit.

2.  No institutional prejeduces on race EVER occur when a minority is sufficently tiny.  The Chinese in Calif. were not discrimated against at first but THEY sure were when they became a large portion of the population!   Are you suggesting that Minn. has long had a large black population that has always been well treated?  Surely not.  Again, your postion is not applicable to the question before us.

3.  From the contast between the wording of your question and what I said, I'm not quite sure what you are saying.  Do you ask if I'm saying your ancestors "drove" blacks off their own farms?  Or that they were driven off the farms of the whites?  Actually, I doubt that black family your parents remember were there in the late 1860s so it's unlikely they were driven off their own farm.  Or, if that isn't what you meant, I'd just note that I never said anyone was driven off any farms at all in the north.  Not applicable.

4.  Right, didn't mention that did I?  And, I am sad to have to admit it, you are correct and it was wrong.  But, my question back to you is, do you want to even suggest that the things you rightly recount never occured in the north?  Or that it was much less frequent or less mean than it was in the south?  If so, you deceive yourself, as blacks in the north would assure you.  So, you are correct in what you say but it's irrelivant to the question.

I NEVER knew of northern discrimination from any history books, other than what happened in some bloody NYC riots against blacks immediately following the start of the war.  (Perhaps you could find something on that history in your liberary.)  Anyway, I learned of it from my northern (black) friends after getting to know several in the USAF in '59.  Some of the stories they told me of northern discrimination made me disgusted.  Some of the things they told me they had been TOLD to expect in the south disgusted me because it wasn't true,  and I told them so.  By the time we sepereated, after completing our electonic training in Biloxi, MS, each one told me they felt safer there and had been better treated in public, in that presumed  bastion of "southern predejuce", than they normally were in Philidelphia, New York and Boston when outside their black neighborhoods (there was one guy from each city in my classes).   That's a fact, at least their statements to me were.  Maybe you would suggest they were lying to me?

Proof?  Naw, no book and page number anyway.  Just a common sense recognition there is a rational basis for things we can still see today.   You can get some specific info from the web site link given above tho, IF you will read it. Conceeding a little to the "logic" of your defense of the north by your memory of Minn, I did see no reference to your state, so maybe that site's all wrong and the north never did any of the dastardly things I've mentioned. ??  :)
Common sense is an uncommon virtue

Offline Bob Riebe

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7484
Re: Yankee Myth # 5 - Race Relations In The Old South
« Reply #56 on: January 05, 2009, 12:22:44 PM »
Is there racial prejudice/hatred in the north, yes, and I would say it grew in the twentieth verses nineteenth century. Thanks to Unlce Sam, mainly.

As I believe you are correct, we spoke on this subject earlier, up here there was white against white prejudice/hatred on ethnic and religious standards that many can not relate to because they were not here.
Families, white northern europeans were separated because people married a person from
the wrong ethnic-religious concern.
This went into the sixties because, as a child, I heard adults, speak in such vile manner they almost spit, of those X, Y, or Z people and it was genuine hatred.

With Johnson's Great Society, suddenly it gave the white folks someone to turn there prejudice against who "looked" different. One, one did not have to wait and hear the possible wrong accent, or ask any questions of these folks as to find out if they were one of those; one only had to look at them and see that they were not of the chosen group.
Johnson's making them into niggers of the state was all it took to forever divide and separate them from merely being a minority who had been forced to work harder to reach the American dream, into ones who did not need the American dream, because as long as they did not get too uppity, the liberal sleaze in Washington would always send them enough money to keep them in their place.

Offline littlecanoe

  • Trade Count: (14)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2842
Re: Yankee Myth # 5 - Race Relations In The Old South
« Reply #57 on: January 05, 2009, 01:43:25 PM »
Who was the lady, a liberal in the early 1900's, who wanted to control the racial mix through planned pregnancy, sterilization?  What city was she from?   I'll bet not Atlanta, Nashville or Richmond.

Good discussion fella's and thanks for rehashing what you had discussed in the past.

Offline wncchester

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3856
  • Gender: Male
Re: Yankee Myth # 5 - Race Relations In The Old South
« Reply #58 on: January 05, 2009, 02:06:09 PM »
"With Johnson's Great Society, suddenly it gave the white folks someone to turn there prejudice against..."

Well, with THAT we are at least largely in agreement.  Johnson wanted to purchase black loyalty to the Democrat Party with public money and was almost totally successful in the effort.  Every thing else he tried collapsed but not that.  He declared a "War on Poverty", but I told my wife the night he announced it that we had a war we would loose.  Did too.  He also planted the seeds that would cost us 50K+ lives and tens of thousands of wounded in Viet Nam.  What a grand team he, V.P. Hubert Humphry and Defense Sec. McNamera made.

I have no idea what effect the War on Poverty/Great Society had on northern whites but I sure watched it's impact on southern blacks.  From a period of illegitimate births of some 6% for whites and 10% for blacks it has gone to about 30% for whites and 85% for blacks.  Black unemployment went from about 9% to about 25%, who needs to work when the gov. hands out free money?  Prision populations grew some two to three times larger, depending on area.   Wow, what a job those great liberals did to "improve" the USA and improve black life.  

Nationwide, race relations took a nose dive in the 60s-70s, from which they have not recovered, but the deep tensions in the northern blacks it played on were laid a hundred years previously.

When the race riots started in the early 60s things were being stirred by opportunistic demagogs, black and white.  When prince Kennedy was killed, the man behind the throne seized his opportunity to make a place for himself in history.  In one of LBJ's first speeches, he said "the squeeky wheel gets the grease."  What he meant was the blacks would have to riot harder so he could get congress to approve the money give-aways he planned.  It worked.  

When LBJ had squandered his presidency with a disasterous war plan, Humphery jumped on the demagogory bandwagon.  In 1968, Humphrey went to Detroit after the first bad weekend of rioting and gave a speech in which he said to the blacks, "I don't blame you, if I had to live like you do, I'd riot too!"  They again got the message.  Over the next few weekends they destroyed much of the city with fire bombs and killed many, black and white of course, with illegal firearms.   The Black Panthers were indeed wild, preditory animals who cared little for whom they killed.

None of the Democratic political planning was calculated to actually "improve" anyone's life, nor to make race relations better.  It was all done to buy the loyalty of blacks for the Democrat Party, the party they could depend on to pass the money plate down from the greedy ol' whites who had all the money (from working) to those po' folks who had none (because they didn't work).  And then Jimmy Carter installed a Dept of Education that was to insure that no one's child had to learn anything in order to gain a diploma.  All together, the Dems have succeeded in pretty well destroying black families.  All the institutions and many of the people they did it with remain in place, largely intact.

I fear we are on the threshold of a massive "round two" of Democrat progression of socialism and the economic wreakage it always brings, every time it's tried.  And, again, it won't help black society nor race relations either.  But it will cost a lot of money to get everything a placid public wants for freeeeee!  As has been promised.

And Minn has a clown for it's new senator, he'll help.  Oh well, I guess we get the govermental "leaders" we deserve, the best fools money can buy.
Common sense is an uncommon virtue

Offline Ga.windbreak

  • Trade Count: (22)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 846
  • Gender: Male
Re: Yankee Myth # 5 - Race Relations In The Old South
« Reply #59 on: January 05, 2009, 10:03:23 PM »
Everything that you 3 are saying has validity but just how does that tie in with race relations in the 1800's? Or are y'all saying there was no racism in those times? Just how do you account for the facts of the several links that some of us have posted. There is nothing new under the sun, you know.?
"Men do not differ about what
Things they will call evils;
They differ enormously about what evils
They will call excusable." - G.K. Chesterton

"It starts when you begin to overlook bad manners. Anytime you quit hearing "sir" and "ma'am", the end is pretty much in sight."-Tommy Lee Jones in No Country for Old Men

Private John Walker Roberts CSA 19th Battalion Georgia Cavalry - Loyalty is a most precious trait - RIP