I have done some research in the Texas Fish & Game laws, and nowhere do I find what you guys are saying is law?
Please furnish some evidence of this.
If in fact what you say IS the law, then I am amazed that somebody like Greenpeace, PETA, or some other radical group hasn't climbed all over this as it is wide open.
I wish all to know that I have never been on these boards for popularity purposes. I come here, read the stuff posted, most of it good. On occasion I reply, add my 2 cents where I have experience and figure it can add to the overall attitude of the post.
Like GB, I am old. Having said that, I have spent countless thousands of hours in the woods hunting, probabley three times that in shooting and getting ready. These 22 tales just don't jive with what I have seen.
Once I tracked a couple of coons into an old hollowed out tree. There was maybe 6 inches between the gun muzzle and those fat coons. Two tubes of 22 lr bullets were emptied on those coons and they were still far from dead. Most of the bullets were just under the hide in the fat.
When I was a kid I popped off many a phesant rooster with the 22 lr in a Remington bolt gun. Also shot a pile of squirrels, rabbits, and a few muskrats when I was running the trap line. At no point, even in those young years did I entertain shooting anything much bigger than that listed, simply because I had no desire to chase wounded game all over the place. Nobody had to tell me this, it's just plain common sense.
If in fact the lowly 22 rimfire were such a punk round on everything that walked this planet there would be little else available on the gun racks. Does anyone NEED a 378 Weatherby to kill deer? Hell no! Is it effective? You betcha.
Is the 30-30 a good killer on game? Depends on whose hands it's in. In the right hands, a man who knows how to shoot, holds his fire until the shot is neigh perfect, well that man can kill game with a 30-30 even when it SHOULDN't! That same man will also tell you he wouldn't reccomend everyone do it.
Keep in mind that once all we had was the 30-30, 32, 38-55, and the 35 Rem. The bullets then were far inferior to what we have now, the powders available then did not yeild the best in terminal ballistics. Yet those boys came home with the bacon. There were no tricksters then, no one foolish enough to risk the winters meat supply on a "Hail Mary" shot.
We have evolved in our technology to a point where it is possible to cleanly kill a game animal at well over 500 yards. We have better rifles, better bullets, better optics, rangefinders, and even wind detectors. And with all this technology, how many people are actually capable of utilizing it? The answer is suprisingly few.
We're humans, full of nerve bundles. We shake, we shiver, we get excited when we see game. Those 1 MOA groups off the bench open up to 6 and 8 inches in the field, and that's on a good day! So you'll pardon me when someone wants to pop game with a 22 lr or 25 acp exclaiming that they'll just pop em right in the eyesocket! Uh huh.....
You see, I have always taken my killing rather serious. No stock Volkswagon will ever win the Indy 500, but there is no harm in some nimrod attempting to do so. Killing on the other hand places all of the rules of error on the victim. So if you decide to light up a brown bear with a 223 and it don't work for dogsnot, who suffers? You? Nope, the danged bear.
It amazes me the amount of "credible" evidence to support a claim. "Yah man, I knew this old timer who kilt crocodiles all day long with a BB gun...." Strikes me as odd that it's always somebody else pulling this stuff, and not the teller of the tale. Perhaps, the teller KNOWS it's not the right thing to do and don't want to face the music.
Like everybody else, when I was 20 I figured I knew quite a bit. When I was 35 I felt I knew more. When I turned 50 I found out how much I DIDN'T know, comes with age.
I'm open to about anything, except foolishness that can get someone hurt, or, causes undue suffering on game animals. And that includes varmits. Even they deserve a quick and merciful dispatch.
I am anxious to see the WMA laws that state subclass weapons are a MUST. Federal law ALWAYS overrides local law, perhaps we can get this fixed :wink: