Author Topic: Poll: 35 Remington Accessory Barrel ? (Read 5945 times)

quickdtoo · « **on:** January 13, 2009, 05:03:23 PM »

Although Remington has already considered a .35 Rem rifle that didn't get off the ground due to lack of distributor interest, how about just an accessory barrel? Please be sure to vote, not just post a reply.

Tim

Spanky · « **Reply #1 on:** January 13, 2009, 05:09:26 PM »

In a heartbeat.

Spanky

Tunaman · « **Reply #2 on:** January 13, 2009, 05:12:34 PM »

Never was a more fitting nickname given. You are truley quick. thanks for gettng this going so quickly.

As some of you know, any centerfire 35 cal and over is leagal in Mississippi's primitive arms season. I would love to have one. Actually the 45-70 is great but the 35 Rem would give me a great excuse for something new.

brennemanj83 · « **Reply #3 on:** January 13, 2009, 05:41:57 PM »

Tim you are the man

omcforever · « **Reply #4 on:** January 13, 2009, 05:58:08 PM »

I am in.

BCall · « **Reply #5 on:** January 13, 2009, 06:45:28 PM »

I'd like to place my order to have the 35 Rem and the 17 Fireball delivered at the same time please?

trotterlg · « **Reply #6 on:** January 13, 2009, 07:21:41 PM »

The ultimate answer is to offer unchambered barrels. Failing that, for legal reasons, barrels chambered in say 30 Carbine, 32 H&R, 45 ACP, 9 mm Auto etc would let others chamber them in whatever they want and still satisify the lawyers. How about a .25-20 which could go to a .25-06 or a Weatherby? Larry

Rustyinfla · « **Reply #7 on:** January 13, 2009, 08:33:40 PM »

If I was going to go with a .35 and wanted more than the .357 Max. I think I'd want to go all the way to a .35 Whelen. Maybe they could work the bugs out of that one this time around.

PigBoy Crabshaw · « **Reply #8 on:** January 13, 2009, 08:46:24 PM »

I'm all in for one. I've had my eye on a Marlin 35 Rem 336CS. But the price is to high for a new condition / used lever at $400. I can buy a new one for $430.
Count me in for a group buy Tim!

-g

JerryKo · « **Reply #9 on:** January 14, 2009, 12:21:48 AM »

Count me in!

I think that would be a fine addition.

Jerry

Graybeard · « **Reply #10 on:** January 14, 2009, 01:15:10 AM »

Quote from: trotterlg on January 13, 2009, 07:21:41 PM

The ultimate answer is to offer unchambered barrels. Failing that, for legal reasons, barrels chambered in say 30 Carbine, 32 H&R, 45 ACP, 9 mm Auto etc would let others chamber them in whatever they want and still satisify the lawyers. How about a .25-20 which could go to a .25-06 or a Weatherby? Larry

You have to realize the factories REALLY DON'T LIKE folks rechambering and otherwise altering barrels in that manner. To do things that would seemingly encourage it puts them in a worse position relative to law suits when things go wrong and someone wants to sue them for a few million bucks cuz they did something stupid.

lendar · « **Reply #11 on:** January 14, 2009, 02:30:57 AM »

Sir, do you plan on doing anything with the results, such as contacting Remington?

burntmuch · « **Reply #12 on:** January 14, 2009, 03:01:36 AM »

Yes I would order one. Then my life would be complete

dpe.ahoy · « **Reply #13 on:** January 14, 2009, 03:35:46 AM »

I have my credit card out and ready. Would prefer the whole gun, acc. barrel is the next best thing. The answer; OH HELL YAH! DP

PHATINJUN · « **Reply #14 on:** January 14, 2009, 03:40:05 AM »

I voted no what with the 357 30-40Imp Krag and the 30.06ultra comp I just can't see paying the accessory bbl fees don't mean I wouldn't try and secure one some other way though. Kurt

Also I highly doubt they... Remington would consider the Whelen over thier own caliber.

jw1044 · « **Reply #15 on:** January 14, 2009, 03:42:44 AM »

I would buy one as soon as they are available.

Badnews Bob · « **Reply #16 on:** January 14, 2009, 04:22:05 AM »

I would prefer a Whelan, but I have been considering a .35 rechamber. so I might get one.

BTW I have begin to believe in the one rifle one frame style, Just more practical for me.

Are you listening Remington or whoever you are.

You make'em we'll buy'em.

Graybeard · « **Reply #17 on:** January 14, 2009, 04:31:05 AM »

Hate ta be da one ta break it to ya Kurt but the Whelen IS Remington's caliber. They are the one who domesticated it.

Natty Bumppo · « **Reply #18 on:** January 14, 2009, 05:09:39 AM »

I'd order one, but I'd rather they make .38-55 barrels again.

quickdtoo · « **Reply #19 on:** January 14, 2009, 05:36:46 AM »

Quote from: lendar on January 14, 2009, 02:30:57 AM

Sir, do you plan on doing anything with the results, such as contacting Remington?

YES!!!

Tim

bajabill · « **Reply #20 on:** January 14, 2009, 06:48:11 AM »

sorry, I had to say no.

357max fills this hole for me, along with the whelen.

db22 · « **Reply #21 on:** January 14, 2009, 09:29:10 AM »

What Spanky said -- in a heartbeat!! I already have a Max, but .35 Rem brass is common, uses common powders, and is, like the Max, well-adapted to cast bullets. A slightly faster rifling twist would allow me to use my Lyman 245-grain roundnose mold. That bullet was designed for the old .35 WCF, which is rimmed and would be an even better bet for the Handi, but brass is a problem. .35 Rem could still push the big old Lyman along at a respectable clip, making an even better cast bullet deer rifle than the Max.

LaOtto222 · « **Reply #22 on:** January 14, 2009, 10:57:59 AM »

I voted "yes". I think it would fit in very nice with my collection of barrels. I have a 357 Max - but the 35 Remington would still be nice. I would like it even better if it had a fast twist rate (1-14 or so) and Ballard type rifling for heavy hard cast bullets.

Hammerspur · « **Reply #23 on:** January 14, 2009, 11:20:00 AM »

Would make a nice compliment to my .30-30 I think.

Troyboy · « **Reply #24 on:** January 14, 2009, 12:01:38 PM »

I voted yes again

lostarrow · « **Reply #25 on:** January 14, 2009, 12:17:19 PM »

I live in mississippi, mainly hunt with a buffalo classic in 45 lc, I'd luv a 35 rem and would mount on my BC 38-55

Doublebass73 · « **Reply #26 on:** January 14, 2009, 04:09:31 PM »

I'd love to see a 35 Rem, especially in a compact Superlight contour.
That would be perfect for banging around all day in the New England brush.

PHATINJUN · « **Reply #27 on:** January 14, 2009, 04:20:00 PM »

Thanks GB I did not know that. Now I gotta look in my books to check them both out . Still don't think I need to try and squeezz it into my .30 line up...but then once it becomes a got to have caliber I turn to mush. Kurt

Jeff H · « **Reply #28 on:** January 14, 2009, 05:17:43 PM »

Quote from: db22 on January 14, 2009, 09:29:10 AM

What Spanky said -- in a heartbeat!! ........

Ditto!
Always thought that was one that was perfect for the Handi'.

BBF · « **Reply #29 on:** January 14, 2009, 06:38:41 PM »

Wasn't there a 35 Winchester at one time? A rimmed case at that !

Poll

Would you order a .35 Rem Accessory Barrel"

Author Topic: Poll: 35 Remington Accessory Barrel ? (Read 5945 times)