Author Topic: 30 remington ar  (Read 1752 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline simplicity

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 574
  • Gender: Male
30 remington ar
« on: January 14, 2009, 06:02:35 AM »
Anyone seen or heard about this round 30 remington ar? Roughly developes about 2100 lbs. I just wanted to know what peoples thoughts are about it I really like is consept and wish it had come out before the 6.8spc did but hey we all want what we can't have. As for a military round I think they outta give it a try.

Offline skifastchad

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (17)
  • Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 332
Re: 30 remington ar
« Reply #1 on: January 14, 2009, 06:47:03 AM »
The fact that it uses 123gr fmj and 125gr corelokt and accutip leads me to believe that it is a .310, not a .308.

If remington sells the upper assemblies, I might think about one, but I'd also wait to see how the bolt face and locking lugs hold up first.   There are some thin looking parts when they put a .473 face on an AR15 bolt.

Offline Lloyd Smale

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (32)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18263
Re: 30 remington ar
« Reply #2 on: January 14, 2009, 09:49:09 AM »
no its a .308. It would make a decent deer rifle but i dont see what it does that a 762x39 doesnt and you can allready get an ar in that.
blue lives matter

Offline jasonprox700

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 461
  • Gender: Male
Re: 30 remington ar
« Reply #3 on: January 14, 2009, 09:50:49 AM »
Here's an interesting article I found on it.  http://accurateshooter.wordpress.com/2008/10/15/remington-introduces-new-30-remington-ar-cartridge/

Remington Arms just introduced a new cartridge, the 30 Remington AR (aka “30 RAR”), to be used in AR-platform rifles to be built by its DPMS subsidiary. (Remington, DPMS, and Bushmaster are all owned by Cerberus Capital Management, a private holding company.) The cartridge carries the “short, fat” design to the extreme. It is based on a shortened version of the .450 Bushmaster, which itself was a cut-down version of the .284 Winchester. Like the .284 Win, the 30 Remington AR has a rebated rim, so it will fit a .308 Win-sized boltface (0.473″). While it resembles a 30BR, the new case is much fatter, offering an impressive 44 grains of powder capacity. The portly diameter of the 30 RAR case dictates that the magazine will be a single-stack, and will hold only four (4) rounds.

Cram a Big Cartridge in an AR15 Mag and Make Sure It’s a Thirty
What was Remington thinking? Well, the stated project goal was to transform the standard AR15 into a “legitimate big game hunting platform.” Presumably, a 30-caliber cartridge was chosen for marketing purposes as that is the most common deer hunting caliber. The “science” of the design was basically to stuff the biggest cartridge possible in a standard AR15-sized magazine. According to Outdoor Life columnist John Snow: “DPMS President Randy Luth and Remington’s John Fink (brand manager for the rifle division) … both said that the goal was to look at the AR lower and see how much cartridge they could fit in there.”

30 Remington AR (30 RAR) Specifications

Case Capacity Rim
Diam. Parent Cases Shoulder Factory Load Mag Type
44.0gr H20 0.473″
.308 bolt face .450 Bushmaster
.284 Winchester 25° 125gr SP or
125 B-Tip
2800 fps
0.267 BC 4-Round
Single Stack



Factory 30 Remington AR Rifles and Uppers
Initially, the 30 Remington AR round will be chambered in complete, DPMS-built Remington R15 rifles, which start at $1,199.00 MSRP. For production rifles, the expected rate of twist is 1:10″, but that has not been finalized. What about separate uppers? Given the hefty price of the complete rifle, existing AR owners may prefer to purchase a 30-caliber upper by itself. While no release date was given, Remington stated that 30 RAR uppers will definitely be offered for sale in the future.

Impressive Velocities but Much Less Energy than a .308 Win Shooting 160s
With 44 grains of capacity, the 30 RAR can generate some impressive velocities with bullets in the 120-125gr weight range. Remington claims its 125gr factory ammo will deliver 2800 fps muzzle velocities running at about 55,000 psi pressure levels. Three factory loads will be offered: Rem-branded 125gr Core-Lokt PSP and 125gr AccuTip BT, and a UMC-branded 123gr FMJ. At $18.99 per 20-round box, the UMC ammo is intended for inexpensive practice purposes. The $35.99/box AccuTip and $26.49/box Core-Lokt PSP are much costlier. The relatively light-weight bullets used in the Remington ammo have poor Ballistic Coefficients compared to the longer, heavier bullets typically used in a .308 Win or 7mm-08. The 125gr Core-Lokt has a 0.267 BC, while the 125gr AccuTip is somewhat better at 0.335. Nonetheless, Remington’s ballistics tables show that the AccuTip should match the trajectory of a 165gr AccuTip (fired from a .308 Win), fairly well out to 400 yards. However, there is a BIG difference in energy as you can see from the table below. At 300 yards, the 125gr AccuTip delivers 1153 ft/lbs of energy compared to 1661 ft/lbs for a 165gr AccuTip launched at 2700 fps from a .308 Win. (Note: these numbers were calculated with 24″ barrels. Remington’s 30 RAR-chambered R15 rifle has a 22″ barrel, so its performance should be somewhat less impressive.)




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMENTARY by EDITOR
Our first reaction to the news of Remington’s new cartridge was: “Why?” The obvious (and cynical) answer is that Remington wanted to sell AR-style rifles to deer hunters who need an excuse to purchase a military-style semi-automatic. There may be a market for that… who knows. But there is already a proven, compact 30-caliber cartridge that fits a standard-sized AR15 lower — the 7.62×39. The 7.62×39 won’t push a 125-grainer as fast as the bigger 30 RAR, but the 7.62×39 will still kill a whitetail plenty dead. Perhaps Remington’s engineers should simply have applied themselves to producing a proper (i.e. 100% functional) 7.62×39 magazine. This Editor has tried most of the AR15 7.62×39 magazines on the market (from 3-rd to 30-rd capacity). None of those I tested worked particularly well. Some simple redesign work (call the MagPul folks) would solve that.

Better AR Ballistics with 6.5 and 6mm Cartridges
If the goal was to produce an AR15 with better ballistics and downrange energy than the .223 Rem cartridge delivers, we’re not sure a 30-caliber was the way to go. The 6.5 Grendel performs exceptionally well in AR rifles, delivering great accuracy with 123gr Lapua Scenar or Sierra bullets. Likewise, the AR15 can be a superb High Power and Cross-the-Course platform shooting the 6mmAR cartridge developed by Robert Whitley. The 6mmAR is the 6.5 Grendel necked down to 6mm. Shooting 105 Berger VLDs it comes very, very close to the ballistics of the larger 6mmBR cartridge, and it gives up nothing in accuracy. By contrast, with its low-BC bullets, the 30 Remington AR is not going to be competitive at longer ranges with either the 6.5 Grendel or the 6mmAR. And with factory mags limited to four (4) rounds, you couldn’t use this gun effectively in High Power matches, even if it proves highly accurate on the short course.

Important Innovation or Another Orphan Cartridge?
Only time will tell whether the 30 Remington AR cartridge will catch on with sport shooters and hunters. We’re not sure the round has an important purpose that cannot be filled by existing, proven cartridges. The complete 30 RAR rifles are expensive ($1200+) compared to a typical bolt-action deer rifle, so we wonder how many deer hunters will actually jump on Remington’s bandwagon. Speaking frankly, so long as the cartridge is available only with Remington-made brass, we predict little interest among competitive shooters. Now if Lapua were to produce a 65,000-psi rated version of this cartridge, THAT might interest hunter benchrest shooters and BR for score shooters. A Lapua 30 RAR would be like a 30BR on steroids. But alas, don’t expect Lapua, or Norma, or even Winchester, to produce 30 RAR brass any time soon.

So, does the 30 Remington AR (aka “30 RAR”) have a future? It will certainly stimulate sales of AR-platform rifles to some extent. That’s important because AR sales have been lagging recently. Perhaps that is enough justification for a new round. All things considered however, we think Remington would have been better off building its “AR for big game” around the 6.5 Grendel case, perhaps in a 7mm version. Still, we have to credit Remington’s designers. Using a modern “short, fat” design, with a rebated rim, they’ve achieved impressive velocities in a very compact cartridge. The chopped-down .284 may prove to be a very accurate design.


Offline Graybeard

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (69)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26944
  • Gender: Male
Re: 30 remington ar
« Reply #4 on: January 14, 2009, 10:02:26 AM »
Quote
So, does the 30 Remington AR (aka “30 RAR”) have a future? It will certainly stimulate sales of AR-platform rifles to some extent. That’s important because AR sales have been lagging recently.

What rock has this guy been hiding under? Everywhere I've heard about they are flying off the shelves faster than the manufacturers can resupply them. Same for all AR support items like magazines, ammo and even components to load ammo.


Bill aka the Graybeard
President, Graybeard Outdoor Enterprises
256-435-1125

I am not a lawyer and do not give legal advice.

Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life anyone who believes in Him will have everlasting life!

Offline Cheesehead

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3282
  • Gender: Male
Re: 30 remington ar
« Reply #5 on: January 14, 2009, 10:56:08 AM »
Sounds like an interesting cartridge. Seems like it is designed as a hunting round and not a competion round. A wildcat version in 7mm or 6.5mm would be a good round also. For now I will stick to my 6.8 SPC.

Cheese
Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance.

Offline jmayton

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 941
Re: 30 remington ar
« Reply #6 on: January 14, 2009, 11:13:24 AM »
Looks interesting, but I doubt it'll catch on.  I'm with Cheeshead....unless I can get me a 6.5 Grendel upper.

Offline skifastchad

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (17)
  • Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 332
Re: 30 remington ar
« Reply #7 on: January 14, 2009, 12:34:49 PM »
no its a .308.

I can't find any 123fmj .308 bullets though, which is why I think it is a .310 .

The articles said it has a .308 bolt face (.473) , but nothing published yet about bullet diameter.  If someone can show me 125gr remington accutips in .308 or 123gr .308 bullets, I'll believe it, but I still say .310.

Offline Lloyd Smale

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (32)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18263
Re: 30 remington ar
« Reply #8 on: January 15, 2009, 02:40:42 AM »
you know ive searched high and wide and cannot find one refernce to whether its a .307, .308 or .310 but now that good mags can be found for a 762x39 and brass and bullets are so cheap i sure cant see buying one especially if its a .308. A guy would have to buy bullets from remington for it if you wanted ball, brass is going to be expensive and real hard to find at first and just finding mags that work will be expensive if they are caliber specific and .223s dont work and if they do fining high capacity ones right now will be about like finding gold burried in your yard. That all been said i think remington should send me one of them to test so i can write a glowing report and convince all of you with bs that you have to have one and then they can let me keep it for sellling my soul. Hell id be just like a gun writer then!!
blue lives matter

Offline Graybeard

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (69)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26944
  • Gender: Male
Re: 30 remington ar
« Reply #9 on: January 15, 2009, 03:33:50 AM »
Who is now making good mags for the 7,62x39 Lloyd? I thought they were still all messed up and not feeding properly. I guess I've not yet heard of the good ones.


Bill aka the Graybeard
President, Graybeard Outdoor Enterprises
256-435-1125

I am not a lawyer and do not give legal advice.

Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life anyone who believes in Him will have everlasting life!

Offline S.S.

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2840
Re: 30 remington ar
« Reply #10 on: January 15, 2009, 02:19:33 PM »
be kinda' interesting in a single shot handgun.
Same OAL as a 223 rem. so that sounds like a 7.62x45.
The CZ/Vz52 rifle was chambered for that decades ago.
I do see the new one is a bit fatter though.
Vir prudens non contra ventum mingit
"A wise man does not pee against the wind".

Offline Lloyd Smale

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (32)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18263
Re: 30 remington ar
« Reply #11 on: January 16, 2009, 01:10:04 AM »
c products is suppose to be making one that works.
Who is now making good mags for the 7,62x39 Lloyd? I thought they were still all messed up and not feeding properly. I guess I've not yet heard of the good ones.
blue lives matter

Offline simplicity

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 574
  • Gender: Male
Re: 30 remington ar
« Reply #12 on: January 21, 2009, 09:45:55 AM »
Wow I got more replys then I thought it would draw. Like I said when I first made the thread  I think it's a good concept. Whether it takes off or even stays around I think only time will tell. As far as a combat cartridge I still would like to see something 30 caliber rather rather then 270. Not saying a 6.8 won't work it's just my opinion.

Offline mannyrock

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2081
Re: 30 remington ar
« Reply #13 on: January 22, 2009, 07:27:14 AM »

   In my opinion, another "dead-end" project by Remington.

   The marketing ploy of "now introducing a brand new exciting cartridge" doesn't work anymore.  There have been so many new cartridges introduced in the last 10 years, that people are numb to the idea.  Moreover, about half of the new cartridges are already heading towards the bone yard.  (The super-short .223, the .25 WSM, Rums, Saurs, etc. etc.) 

   Anybody who wants a good deer cartridge in the AR platform out to 200 yards already has the option of getting the 6.8 SPC or the 7.62x39mm.  These are both proven performers.

   Anybody who feels compelled to spend $2,000 just to get an AR rifle for the possibility of shooting deer beyond 200 yards should really sit down and examine their priorities in life.

   Use as a self-defense or tactial weapon? Not likely, given the fact that it will only have a 4 round magazine, which will probably jam.

   If Remington is pursuing the tiny niche market that this AR configuration may appeal to, Remington must be utterly desperate for business.

  Just my thoughts.

Mannyrock



   


Offline sachel.45

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 476
Re: 30 remington ar
« Reply #14 on: January 22, 2009, 09:40:25 AM »
i honestly think its cool. anything to get the AR seen as a hunting rifle is a good thing and im serioulsy(sp) thinking about getting one as soon as im able (but i do have weird priorities you know like having fun and trying new things) and if the prices of the non .30 RAR are any indication then the rifles should be around the 1000-1500 area. by the way it was never intened as a self defense or tactial weapon
common sense is slowly becoming uncommon

Offline FLNT4EVR

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (8)
  • A Real Regular
  • *****
  • Posts: 603
  • Gender: Male
Re: 30 remington ar
« Reply #15 on: January 25, 2009, 02:57:33 AM »
If you want to hunt big game with an AR type rifle why not get a DPMS in 308 or 260 .It seems foolish to me to invest money in a new rifle fireing a cartridge that quite possibly won't be around in 5 yrs.
" Act civilized...even if you ain't " 
 
" I won't be wronged. I won't be insulted. I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to other people , and I require the same from them. "
                                  John Wayne, "The Shootist"

Offline sachel.45

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 476
Re: 30 remington ar
« Reply #16 on: January 25, 2009, 05:49:34 PM »
because ar10 are heavyer and typically more expensive. if you buy enough brass it wont matter that much.
common sense is slowly becoming uncommon

Offline ccoker

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 590
  • Gender: Male
    • www.tacticalgunreview.com
Re: 30 remington ar
« Reply #17 on: January 30, 2009, 07:20:23 AM »
will watch it's development
I have two very nice bolt actions, a Sako 270 and a Tikka 308
but I take my 6.8 18" AR out more often than either of them
it's a great stalking gun or close in hog/deer gun
I have killed a few deer with it and it works every bit as effective as the 270 or 308

the 7.62x39 ARs by all accounts aren't working great

my 18" barrel 6.8 is getting 2800 fps with a 110g bullet (barnes or sierra)

I said close range as that's what mine is used for as I have a 3x ACOG on it and it's my choice for hog hunting which is usually 75 yard shots..

but, people have killed ELk at close to 400 yards with it though that is probably pushing the limits
I wouldn't hesitate to take a deer at 300 yards with it if I had a good shot