Author Topic: Another Elite 4200 Vs. Monarch Question (Read 887 times)

hardly · « **on:** August 27, 2003, 08:43:56 AM »

I recently got a Remington VSSF 22-250 and currently am using an el cheapo Bushnell Banner 6X18 that I have had for a while. I do mostly target shooting and although the present scope does a pretty good job, I want to get a good scope for the gun. I am being encouraged by friends to get a Nikon Monarch 6.5X20 target dot but I have been reading a lot of good things about the Bushnell Elite 4200 6X24. I have priced them both and can save about 50 bucks on the Bushnell. Would like to hear anyones opinion. thanks

TheOpticZone · « **Reply #1 on:** August 27, 2003, 09:03:50 AM »

You can't go wrong with either one of them. Both are great scopes.

Zachary · « **Reply #2 on:** August 28, 2003, 09:51:56 AM »

I agree with Jon - both are great scopes. The added advantage of the Elite 4200 is that it has rainguard, which may - or may not - be super helpful for your .22-250 shooting/hunting. Still, I like the Elite 4200s a smidgen better than the Monarchs.

On the other hand, keep in mind that Bushnell is now offering the free rain parka with a purchase of an Elite 3200 or 4200 scope.

Zachary

High Brass · « **Reply #3 on:** September 09, 2003, 02:44:07 AM »

I can only speak experience on the Monarch and can tell you they are excellent optics. I have a Leupold VariX-III and I'm rapidly growing more found of the Nikon Monarch UCC. This hunting season will tell more. Good luck.

TheOpticZone · « **Reply #4 on:** September 11, 2003, 07:44:07 AM »

High Brass,

I could not agree with you more. The Nikon Monarchs are a great scope for the money.