Actually they tie together!
1-uniok meant that they were ok by the father to UNILATERALLY AND ARBITRARILY TERMINATE!
2-see # 1
3-Like I Said- watch your muzzle- don't shoot at anything you don't want to kill. There would be a WHOLE lot less unwanted babies in this country if that was taught!
Good enough Mirage. Just remember, I believe the constitution is where this country is suppose to look for guidance when it comes to final determination on public policy. Some here want it both ways. The constitution when it serves their own personal view and the bible when it does not. Other use false statistics, nationality, race, gender or other invalid or unwarranted information to destroy or freedoms.
Unfortunately or fortunately depending on your view point, in our country, the constitution trumps the bible and the other invalid items when it comes to policy. In general, It’s because we have moved away from these principals is why we are in the mess we have.
Back to point: The constitution is clear on religion and its role in determining public policy. The two can meet at an equal point on a particular issue by coincidence of what society has deemed acceptable, but if not, well, religion is for individuals and the constitution is for public policy. I take it the way it was written and designed, all of it. If I don’t, then how can I defend the 2nd Amendment against its fierce, growing and constant attackers?
It’s not perfect, never will be and we are likely to break-down as a nation some point in the not to distant future. When that day comes, I want my guns to ensure survival and or fight off the onslaught of attacks that will be ordered by the criminals allegedly running the country.