Author Topic: Glen Beck on the $410 billion congress bill  (Read 1288 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Foxxtrot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 288
Glen Beck on the $410 billion congress bill
« on: March 02, 2009, 05:30:27 AM »
“A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity.” Sigmund Freud

Offline Skunk

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3520
Re: Glen Beck on the $410 billion congress bill
« Reply #1 on: March 02, 2009, 05:41:48 AM »
Give it to them good Glen Beck - both parties have it coming.
Mike

"Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition" - Frank Loesser

Offline Dee

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23870
  • Gender: Male
Re: Glen Beck on the $410 billion congress bill
« Reply #2 on: March 02, 2009, 06:11:20 AM »
I like Beck. Limbaugh is the same thing over and over, and Hannity gets on my nerves.
You may all go to hell, I will go to Texas. Davy Crockett

Offline Troyboy

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (41)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1220
  • Gender: Male
  • Work more talk less
Re: Glen Beck on the $410 billion congress bill
« Reply #3 on: March 02, 2009, 06:33:19 AM »
Well the way i see things GB needs to be informing America about the infringement in the second amendment. Why is this topic never brought up. The things that are in the works are really scary and we have no mention of this. IMO this is more important than a little pork. The real issue is GUN RIGHTS. Without guns we have no power over a tyranical govenment.
.204 .22lr .22wm .25acp .223 5.56 .243 .25-06 6.5x55  .308  .300wbymag  7.5x54  7.62x25 7.62x39  338-06  9x19 .38spl  9x18 .45acp . 45-70 .500s&w 12rfl 12smb 20smb  .45lc 410smb .22hornet .280AI    Ask not what your country can do for you BUT what can YOU do for your country

Offline Redtail1949

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1341
Re: Glen Beck on the $410 billion congress bill
« Reply #4 on: March 02, 2009, 07:13:16 AM »
Glen Beck has had several segements about the assault on the 2nd amemdment. he is definately pro gun owner.

Offline SHOOTALL

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23836
Re: Glen Beck on the $410 billion congress bill
« Reply #5 on: March 02, 2009, 07:23:47 AM »
hope all voters here him !
If ya can see it ya can hit it !

Offline Matt

  • .:{Ί.Ί}:.
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2119
  • Gender: Male
    • Inkredible Image
Re: Glen Beck on the $410 billion congress bill
« Reply #6 on: March 02, 2009, 07:36:14 AM »
Here is another good video from Glenn

[yt=425,350]lrW6UO5Zkok[/yt]
Any fool can know. The point is to understand.”
― Albert Einstein

Offline gypsyman

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4852
Re: Glen Beck on the $410 billion congress bill
« Reply #7 on: March 02, 2009, 07:39:45 AM »
I think Beck has more of a handle on the current situation than the rest of them. He has been the talk show person, that has brought up the second amendment more than everybody else. In fact, it was just last week, he mentioned that his wife bought him a new Beretta for Valentine's day. And then had the owner of the gun shop on a few days later, discussing what has been happening with ammo and guns since ''the teflon don'' has been in office.
A year ago or better, he thought that the stock market would drop to 7000. Today, with I suppose some help from advisers, thought that before the end of this year, it would drop to between 3000-5000. Gonna get pretty shakey out there. gypsyman
We keep trying peace, it usually doesn't work!!Remember(12/7/41)(9/11/01) gypsyman

Offline Tommyt

  • Trade Count: (51)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3051
  • Gender: Male
Re: Glen Beck on the $410 billion congress bill
« Reply #8 on: March 02, 2009, 07:40:00 AM »
I will copy/ Paste it so those who have slow Net connections maybe this will Help
------------------------++++-----------------------------------

I'm sick of the government saying one thing and doing the exact opposite. With that in mind, I'm going to starting naming names by pointing out specific lawmakers who don't say what they mean and mean what they say.

Take this $410 billion omnibus spending bill, which Taxpayers for Common Sense says includes about 9,000 earmarks that add up to $7.8 billion.

Call it earmarks, pork or, like Congress does "special projects," you and I know it when you see it — which makes what President Obama has been saying lately ring hollow:
--------------------------------------+++++++++++----------------------------------------

THEN-PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE BARACK OBAMA — SEPTEMBER 22, 2008: The truth is, our earmark system in Washington is fraught with abuse. It badly needs reform — which is why I didn't request a single earmark last year, why I've released all my previous requests for the public to see, and why I've pledged to slash earmarks by more than half when I am president of the United States of America.

THEN-PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE BARACK OBAMA — SEPTEMBER 26, 2008: Absolutely, we need earmark reform. And when I'm president, I will go line by line to make sure that we are not spending money unwisely.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA — FEBRUARY 9, 2009: But when they start characterizing this as pork, without acknowledging that there are no earmarks in this package — something, again, that was pretty rare over the last eight years — then you get a feeling that maybe we're playing politics instead of actually trying to solve problems for the American people.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA — FEBRUARY 24, 2009: I'm proud that we passed the recovery plan free of earmarks.

(END VIDEO CLIPS)

Does President Obama think America is too stupid to see what's really going on, or does he think like Chuck Schumer?

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

SEN. CHARLES SCHUMER, D-N.Y.: And let me say this, to all of the chattering class that so much focuses on those little, tiny — yes, "porky" amendments — the American people really don't care."

(END VIDEO CLIP)

Either way, Obama's wrong.

Is the most powerful man in the world incapable of controlling his own party? He can't keep them from spending on worthy projects like: $1.2 million to fund mosquito trapping in Gainesville, Florida, (requested by Connecticut Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro); $238,000 for Hawaiian canoe trips (sponsored by Hawaiian Senator Daniel Inouye) and $143,000 for the Las Vegas Natural History Museum, which Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid added in.

But this isn't just a problem with the left; it's left and right. Two weeks ago, Republican leader Michael Steele looked me in the eyes and said this:

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

BECK: You don't need to tell the Democrats that they stink. You need the Republicans to actually apply the principles in their lives every single day.

MICHAEL STEELE, RNC CHAIRMAN: Absolutely. Absolutely, and the way I do that, Glenn, is by getting up in their face. I've got to go back to my base, and I've got to make sure that we're grooming the candidates who understand those principles and apply those principles in their leadership, whether legislative office or whatever they're doing that has that Republican brand attached to it.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

But where is Steele now? Why isn't he coming out against members of his own party, naming names and holding their feet to the fire?

Instead he released this statement, presumably to attack the donkeys that are responsible for $4.6 billion of pork, or 60 percent of the crap loaded into the latest budget: "Governor Jindal and I continued our party's fight for reform as the Democrats proposed more wasteful spending and bigger government."

Really?

I'm no mathematician, but I am a thinker. If Democrats are responsible for 60 percent of the pork, then isn't Steele's own party responsible for the other 40 percent?

Since Steele doesn't seem to have the guts to do it, allow me to point out some of the worst Republican hypocrites:

California Congressman Jerry Lewis, the top Republican on the House Appropriations Committee, would spend $3.8 million on a highway in Needles, California; Senate Republican Conference Chairman Lamar Alexander and Senator Bob Corker, both of Tennessee, requested $1.1 million for water treatment plant improvements in their home state; and Mississippi Senator Thad Cochran, the top Republican on Senate appropriations, backs earmarks including a $950,000 nature education center in his state.

Say what you mean, and mean what you say. It doesn't seem like a lot to ask, but, apparently, it is. So now it's time to hold our leaders' feet to the fire.

That's why I'm kicking off a new segment on the program, called "Explain Your Special Projects." After all, if you want Americans to pay almost $4 million for a California highway, then you damn well better be willing to explain why.

And, if you won't or can't, then, well, you may have cost us some money, but we'll make it our mission to cost you your next election.

What do you think? Send your comments to: glennbeck@foxnews.com



Offline SHOOTALL

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23836
Re: Glen Beck on the $410 billion congress bill
« Reply #9 on: March 02, 2009, 08:05:32 AM »
would have taken Beck for Colt man
If ya can see it ya can hit it !

Offline Dixie Dude

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4129
  • Gender: Male
Re: Glen Beck on the $410 billion congress bill
« Reply #10 on: March 02, 2009, 08:49:59 AM »
I said a while back in January that the stock market would hit 5500 before the end of 2009 and the unemployment rate would hit 10%.  May be sooner.  Obama is doing NOTHING to bring the market back up or solve unemployment.  Markets have to recover before businesses hire.  Just a fact.  He is only pushing a socialist agenda.  Administration said today they were going to improve medical care and it would improve jobs.  Just the same old socialist push to nationalise health care. 

Offline SHOOTALL

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23836
Re: Glen Beck on the $410 billion congress bill
« Reply #11 on: March 02, 2009, 08:54:55 AM »
look as long a GOVT. is screwing with business , banks and printing mo money what fool is going to invest ?
Think of it like fishing the GOVT. is tossing all kinds of lures and the first investor to strike will get taxed to death to pay for the ill passed bills to HELP !
If ya can see it ya can hit it !

Offline Oldshooter

  • GBO subscriber and supporter
  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6426
Re: Glen Beck on the $410 billion congress bill
« Reply #12 on: March 02, 2009, 09:06:29 AM »
I like Beck. Limbaugh is the same thing over and over, and Hannity gets on my nerves.

I was wondering if I was the only one that felt that way about Hannity. I have to turn the channel sometimes
It's like some screamin woman nagging at you or something!

Limbaugh I can take in small doses, 

oh I forgot........Sometimes Beck goes off the deep end and I'm tired of these guys selling gold its just a commodity
“Owning a handgun doesn’t make you armed any more than owning a guitar makes you a musician.”

"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."

Offline jimster

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2237
  • Gender: Male
Re: Glen Beck on the $410 billion congress bill
« Reply #13 on: March 02, 2009, 09:32:48 AM »
Hannity has been getting on our nerves here too...you ain't the only one.  Although he agrees with kind of how I think, my God,  get a grip and give some new kind of news once in awhile.  Don't get a chance too much anymore to listen to Rush,  but we agree with each other everytime I listen, and at least he gets me laughing with his sense of humor when I do listen.  Glen Beck is number one these days,  he moved to Fox and is on at the right time for me to listen.
Don't get a chance to watch much TV so it's usually news/news talk show, weather,  and discovery channel and history channel are the best for me. 

I have to turn Hannity off everyday on the way home from work, that's just too much to take after working.   :P

Offline SHOOTALL

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23836
Re: Glen Beck on the $410 billion congress bill
« Reply #14 on: March 02, 2009, 09:56:49 AM »
with Rush just listen every so often and you won't miss anything
If ya can see it ya can hit it !

Offline Dee

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23870
  • Gender: Male
Re: Glen Beck on the $410 billion congress bill
« Reply #15 on: March 02, 2009, 10:11:40 AM »
I said a while back in January that the stock market would hit 5500 before the end of 2009 and the unemployment rate would hit 10%.  May be sooner.  Obama is doing NOTHING to bring the market back up or solve unemployment.  Markets have to recover before businesses hire.  Just a fact.  He is only pushing a socialist agenda.  Administration said today they were going to improve medical care and it would improve jobs.  Just the same old socialist push to nationalise health care. 

Dixie Dude, I have been saying the same thing for a while, and about a month ago Bloomberg said it would go BELOW 5500, and if you were older than thirty years of age to STAY OUT OF THE STOCK MARKET, as you would not live long enough to see a return.
You may all go to hell, I will go to Texas. Davy Crockett

Offline alsaqr

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1270
Re: Glen Beck on the $410 billion congress bill
« Reply #16 on: March 02, 2009, 02:00:08 PM »
Yep, those fine Republican congress weenies from OK put 60 million in earmarks in the bill and then voted against it-the sorry pukes.   The lone Democrat put about 1.5 million in earmarks in the bill-another sorry puke.   

Offline SHOOTALL

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23836
Re: Glen Beck on the $410 billion congress bill
« Reply #17 on: March 03, 2009, 02:36:59 AM »
the stock market will not rebound until we start spending . Govt. , big business or anything else has  control of it . It appears the Govt. is trying to gain more control of big business with all the NEW spending bills but none will jump start spending from the little guys ( most of us ) . Who is rushing out to buy a new car when they have trouble paying for their home cause they have a loan they can't afford ?
If you want to fix it one GOVT. should back away . Two stop taxing business , wake up business passes it to the consumer anyway . Three remove the safetys for big business , if they fail so be it . Same for the banks , insure deposits to a point but after that forget it . When Govt. , Banking , and business is responsible to the investors ( us ) again then and only then will we start to spend .
If ya can see it ya can hit it !

Offline Singleshotsam

  • I.T. Professional
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1682
  • Gender: Male
Re: Glen Beck on the $410 billion congress bill
« Reply #18 on: March 03, 2009, 03:15:20 AM »
Glenn Beck is definately one of the best voices out there for representing the average american's interests.  To say that he is not pro-gun is for sure an uneducated statement.  He has done several pro second amendment pieces on his program. 
I'm voting 3rd party in this election by writing in Jesus Christ for president.  Sadly even if this were an option most of you would still vote Republican because "It's a two party system."

Offline Dixie Dude

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4129
  • Gender: Male
Re: Glen Beck on the $410 billion congress bill
« Reply #19 on: March 03, 2009, 03:49:42 AM »
Spending must also take place by corporations buying raw materials, and hiring people.  Spending must also take place by the rich, or they take their money overseas.  People must get back into the stock market so companies will have money to expand and grow.  In all the recessions since WWII, the stock market rebounded 6 months before the country did.  So, you need a capital gains tax cut on your investments.  Once people start investing in stocks, bonds, and IRA's etc, then the economy pulls out.  It will not pull out until this administration looks at history and sees that tax cuts were the only way to pull out.  It has worked in the past, every time.  Government spending doesn't pull us out, because they are inefficient and don't produce anything. 

Offline Tommyt

  • Trade Count: (51)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3051
  • Gender: Male
Re: Glen Beck on the $410 billion congress bill
« Reply #20 on: March 03, 2009, 04:09:16 AM »
the stock market will not rebound until we start spending . Govt. , big business or anything else has  control of it . It appears the Govt. is trying to gain more control of big business with all the NEW spending bills but none will jump start spending from the little guys ( most of us ) . Who is rushing out to buy a new car when they have trouble paying for their home cause they have a loan they can't afford ?
If you want to fix it one GOVT. should back away . Two stop taxing business , wake up business passes it to the consumer anyway . Three remove the safetys for big business , if they fail so be it . Same for the banks , insure deposits to a point but after that forget it . When Govt. , Banking , and business is responsible to the investors ( us ) again then and only then will we start to spend .

Offline Troyboy

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (41)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1220
  • Gender: Male
  • Work more talk less
Re: Glen Beck on the $410 billion congress bill
« Reply #21 on: March 03, 2009, 04:09:24 AM »
Glenn Beck is definately one of the best voices out there for representing the average american's interests.  To say that he is not pro-gun is for sure an uneducated statement.  He has done several pro second amendment pieces on his program. 


                              I never said he wasn't pro gun
.204 .22lr .22wm .25acp .223 5.56 .243 .25-06 6.5x55  .308  .300wbymag  7.5x54  7.62x25 7.62x39  338-06  9x19 .38spl  9x18 .45acp . 45-70 .500s&w 12rfl 12smb 20smb  .45lc 410smb .22hornet .280AI    Ask not what your country can do for you BUT what can YOU do for your country

Offline SHOOTALL

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23836
Re: Glen Beck on the $410 billion congress bill
« Reply #22 on: March 03, 2009, 04:31:57 AM »
dixie dude , why would any company spend to build a product if there was no demand ? How muck raw material does it take  to build nothing ?
they want to build roads , machines do that from digging the stone to laying the concrete . The econmy is screwed until the average people start buying jeans , shoes , house goods and everything else we buy with disposable income
If ya can see it ya can hit it !

Offline Dixie Dude

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4129
  • Gender: Male
Re: Glen Beck on the $410 billion congress bill
« Reply #23 on: March 03, 2009, 04:48:18 AM »
OK, I have some business experience, my wife buys and sells stock.  We have also ran our own business.  There are billions of dollars sitting on the sideline right now that have been pulled from the stock market.  Companies use stock to pay off debt, expand, and spend to improve their market share.  My company's stock right now is worth $24.  It was about $80 last summer.  My company can use this extra capital to expand (it is a utility), go into and service areas not served, buy new equipment, vehicles, office space, computers, desks, chairs, etc.  It cannot do that with a low market value.  It doesn't matter how much money the banks have to loan, they will only loan money to companies based on their value (outstanding stock and value of stock).  People who make money off stock, 401(k) plans, IRA's, and just plain rich investors, have to pay capital gains taxes on the increasing value of their stocks when they pull some out for personal use.  If you had a capital gains tax cut, people would go back to investing in the stock market, companies would be worth more, thus increasing their credit value if they borrow to expand or grow, thus putting people to work, making money and spending this money.  So, when the stock market rebounds, it takes about 6 months for the expansion of the markets to trickle down to jobs, and spending.  Face it corporations spend way more money than individuals, so when they spend, the economy expands with jobs, and more spending.  If Wal-mart has a higher valued stock, they can expand into areas they are not in, expand their distribution network, put truckers to work, commercial building, thus people who have these jobs, buys cars and homes and appliances, etc.  Bottom up spending like Obama wants will not stimulate the economy.  Poor don't have enough money to buy big ticket items.  They buy food, clothes, maybe a used car, maybe a mobile home or small home, can't expand much their except at the expense of the middle class and rich.  Large Corporations used to provide 80% of the jobs in America, it is probably 50% or less now.  Small business provides most of the rest.  If a small business owner makes over $250,000 under Obama's plan he is screwed, so he can't expand.  Doctors, Lawyers, Plumbers, Electricians, are small business, and they now have limited growth because of excessive taxes.  Tax cuts for corporations, capital gains, and business owners it the only way to get expansion of the economy, it was the only thing that worked in the past, and the only thing that will work now.  My banker told us to refinance our mortgage now, because next year we are probably looking at 20% interest and high inflation for all the government spending.  I told you guys earlier that the Dow would get to 5500 by the end of the year, and unemployment would reach 10% before the end of 2009.  Looks like it is headed that way.  We are headed for Jimmy Carter style "stagflation"  High interests, high unemployment, and high inflation to pay back the goverment t-bills they issued to spend this money.  China and the Arab countries own most of these T-bills.  So the government really don't want us to stop buying from China, and oil from the Arabs.  It is a catch 22.  Only way to stop it is for the Feds to stop spending, and lower taxes.  When Reagan took office the Feds were spending 34% of the total GNP, 10% unemployment, 18% interest, and high inflation.  When he left office, it was 22% of GNP, about 6-1/2% unemployment, and single digit interset, and 3% inflation.  Got even better in the 90's with Republican control of congress under Newt Gingrich.  Balanced the budget, no inflation, and low interest.

Offline kansasj

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 280
  • Gender: Male
Re: Glen Beck on the $410 billion congress bill
« Reply #24 on: March 03, 2009, 05:03:53 AM »
Dixie Dude
You are EXACTLY right.  Your comments should be published!
kansasj
Yesterday is history--tomorrow is a mystery--today is a gift!---That is why they call it the present!

Offline SHOOTALL

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23836
Re: Glen Beck on the $410 billion congress bill
« Reply #25 on: March 03, 2009, 06:33:43 AM »
but it all hinges on sales and small business
If ya can see it ya can hit it !

Offline Foxxtrot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 288
Re: Glen Beck on the $410 billion congress bill
« Reply #26 on: March 04, 2009, 09:12:06 AM »
If I owned a small company and made over $250k, I would spend the next four years making no more than $240k. By the time you figure taxes you will keep more of your income. Doesn't pay to work hard under this administration.
“A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity.” Sigmund Freud

Offline SHOOTALL

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23836
Re: Glen Beck on the $410 billion congress bill
« Reply #27 on: March 04, 2009, 09:27:29 AM »
most of us that do own one hope we have work for the next 4 not how to limit our income . that seems to be taking care of itsef .
If ya can see it ya can hit it !

Offline Questor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7075
Re: Glen Beck on the $410 billion congress bill
« Reply #28 on: March 04, 2009, 09:45:42 AM »
Foxxtrot:

Anyone in business that's in that situation has only to search for the right accountant. When you ask a good accountant how much you made last year, the answer should be "how much do you want to make?".
Safety first

Offline Dixie Dude

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4129
  • Gender: Male
Re: Glen Beck on the $410 billion congress bill
« Reply #29 on: March 04, 2009, 09:58:59 AM »
It was reported today by the chairman of the FDIC that there have been so many bank failures that they will run out of money by the end of this year to guarentee the accounts.  You either need to be in a good solvent bank or change to one or don't use a bank.