« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: are guns dangerous?  (Read 1828 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SHOOTALL

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23836
Re: are guns dangerous?
« Reply #30 on: March 25, 2009, 10:40:08 AM »
gee i figured every body that hunted fished , what an eye opener .
Logged
If ya can see it ya can hit it !

Offline slim rem 7

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2028
Re: are guns dangerous?
« Reply #31 on: March 25, 2009, 12:19:11 PM »
  dukekiller.. no offence but eactly where do you stand on ccw and the ownership of long guns..i believe in them .. what is your position..
 just wondering brother slim ps you got the right to an opinion .. also the right to not tell me if you choose..
Logged

Offline dukkillr

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3428
    • The Daily Limit
Re: are guns dangerous?
« Reply #32 on: March 25, 2009, 12:58:29 PM »
I took the CCW class here in KS... I voted against our popular governor because she vetoed the law the first time it was passed...

I certainly own plenty of guns, i've posted pictures of me using them ;)

I just don't link ideologically driven arguements that don't match reality... This one really is more about semantics, but just the same, I won't be wrong to support an ideology... An ideology that requires you to be wrong needs rethinking...

And I still think this is really a dumb debate.
Logged

Offline Cement Man

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1265
  • Gender: Male
Re: are guns dangerous?
« Reply #33 on: March 25, 2009, 02:05:28 PM »
Asking for or suggesting a finite answer to a relative question usually does make for a dumb debate.
Logged
CIVES ARMA FERANT - Let the citizens bear arms.
POLITICIANS SHOULD BE LIMITED TO TWO TERMS - ONE IN OFFICE AND ONE IN PRISON.... Illinois already does this.

Offline Cabin4

  • Avery H. Wallace
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4938
  • Gender: Male
  • Out West
Re: are guns dangerous?
« Reply #34 on: March 25, 2009, 02:34:59 PM »
I agree, dumb debate.
Logged
Avery Hayden Wallace
Obama Administration: A corrupt criminal enterprise of bold face liars.
The States formed the Union. The Union did not form the States. States Rights!
GET US OUT OF THE UN. NO ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT!
S.A.S.S/NRA Life Member/2nd Amendment Foundation
CCRKBA/Gun Owners of America
California Rifle & Pistol Association
Ron Paul Was Right!
Long Live the King! #3

Offline 45-70.gov

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (7)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7009
  • Gender: Male
Re: are guns dangerous?
« Reply #35 on: March 26, 2009, 04:50:28 PM »
what  is the debate??

i  just posted  informaition  that appears to be accurate
and put in a simple to understand format

next  time  you hear  a moron suggest that guns are dangerous  and need to be regulated MORE
you can refer to this  thread  and/or copy  those links

if  you think it is a dumb  ''depate''       see  you on  another thread


duke    did  your state  get  the ccw??
Logged
when drugs are outlawed only out laws will have drugs
DO WHAT EVER IT TAKES TO STOP A DEMOCRAT
OBAMACARE....the biggest tax hike in the  history of mankind
free choice and equality  can't co-exist
AFTER THE LIBYAN COVER-UP... remind any  democrat voters ''they sat and  watched them die''...they  told help to ''stand down''

many statements made here are fiction and are for entertainment purposes only and are in no way to be construed as a description of actual events.
no one is encouraged to do anything dangerous or break any laws.

Offline Cabin4

  • Avery H. Wallace
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4938
  • Gender: Male
  • Out West
Re: are guns dangerous?
« Reply #36 on: March 26, 2009, 04:54:16 PM »
This thread had turned into a debate as to weather a gun is or is not an inanimate object. Agian, I agree that is not worth the effort.
Logged
Avery Hayden Wallace
Obama Administration: A corrupt criminal enterprise of bold face liars.
The States formed the Union. The Union did not form the States. States Rights!
GET US OUT OF THE UN. NO ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT!
S.A.S.S/NRA Life Member/2nd Amendment Foundation
CCRKBA/Gun Owners of America
California Rifle & Pistol Association
Ron Paul Was Right!
Long Live the King! #3

Offline Cement Man

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1265
  • Gender: Male
Re: are guns dangerous?
« Reply #37 on: March 26, 2009, 05:44:42 PM »
Quote from: 45-70.gov on March 26, 2009, 04:50:28 PM
what  is the debate??

i  just posted  informaition  that appears to be accurate
and put in a simple to understand format

next  time  you hear  a moron suggest that guns are dangerous  and need to be regulated MORE
you can refer to this  thread  and/or copy  those links

if  you think it is a dumb  ''depate''       see  you on  another thread


duke    did  your state  get  the ccw??

.45-70,
The fact sheets you posted are interesting and informative.  I think they DO dispel many popular misconceptions about the lawful possession and use of firearms and related activities.  Thanks for posting.  In the past, when refuting anti-gun and anti-hunting editorials or articles, I have quoted NSC and similar statistics which compare firearm and hunting accident rates to other activities.  A lot of people who have little knowledge of firearms or their safe and lawful use do have unfounded and/or inaccurate perceptions related to firearms.  I  meet and converse with people like that frequently.  The statistics you posted support an effective counterpoint.  Good post.
The intent of your question (topic) - "are guns dangerous?" was clear, but that's one of those questions.......
Logged
CIVES ARMA FERANT - Let the citizens bear arms.
POLITICIANS SHOULD BE LIMITED TO TWO TERMS - ONE IN OFFICE AND ONE IN PRISON.... Illinois already does this.

Offline mauser98us

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (40)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1565
  • Gender: Male
  • 10 mm junkie and Whelan wacko
Re: are guns dangerous?
« Reply #38 on: March 26, 2009, 06:21:18 PM »
Ever see the damage a air powered nail gun can do?
Logged

Offline mirage1988

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1665
Re: are guns dangerous?
« Reply #39 on: March 26, 2009, 06:27:00 PM »
I have-
The nurse at the ER asked me (with a nail thru my thumb) how did you do that?

I told her "It took three good hits to get it all the way thru!" duh!
Logged

Offline 45-70.gov

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (7)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7009
  • Gender: Male
Re: are guns dangerous?
« Reply #40 on: March 27, 2009, 03:17:56 PM »
Quote from: mauser98us on March 26, 2009, 06:21:18 PM
Ever see the damage a air powered nail gun can do?


i saw a mans x-ray....the finger bone was splintered
i shot my hand once.....just pulled it  out  hurt but that was  it
Logged
when drugs are outlawed only out laws will have drugs
DO WHAT EVER IT TAKES TO STOP A DEMOCRAT
OBAMACARE....the biggest tax hike in the  history of mankind
free choice and equality  can't co-exist
AFTER THE LIBYAN COVER-UP... remind any  democrat voters ''they sat and  watched them die''...they  told help to ''stand down''

many statements made here are fiction and are for entertainment purposes only and are in no way to be construed as a description of actual events.
no one is encouraged to do anything dangerous or break any laws.

Offline FWiedner

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1686
Re: are guns dangerous?
« Reply #41 on: March 27, 2009, 04:09:19 PM »
When a question like "Are guns dangerous?" is asked, I'd question anyone who dismisses the conversation as worthless when it is pointed out that guns are inanimate and that it takes a deliberate series of human actions to make a gun dangerous.  Who dismisses obvious truth?

Further, I'd question the motivation of persons who introduce differing substances and gun-like objects in comparison and then force the conclusion that guns are dangerous simply because one or more of the objects mentioned could be dangerous in the state they mention, which has nothing to do with guns.

 :)
Logged
They may talk of a "New Order" in the  world, but what they have in mind is only a revival of the oldest and worst tyranny.   No liberty, no religion, no hope.   It is an unholy alliance of power and pelf to dominate and to enslave the human race.
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »