I thought I would start a new thread here since the last one kix started kind of ran away from the intended topic and this post I'm about to make really might not belong in his thread either. Very simply, ponder the following...(keeping all game animals in mind).
Imagine that all rifles and calibers were banned (or never made) except for a bolt action .30-06. Would any hunter (in the US) really be hindered?
For big game from deer to elk or even moose, not so much. It would not be my first choice for big bears but the .30-06 is still the most popular cartridge carried by Alaskan guides (or was last time I saw any info on it, which was a couple years back).
Imagine that all rifles and calibers were banned (or never made) except for a (any) action .30-30. Would any hunter (in the US) really be hindered?
It would be a PITA for varmint hunters and hunters who regularly take big game at ranges past 200 yards. The saying that “you can always get closer” bears little relation to the facts. Over the years using only a .30-30 would have resulted in fewer animals in my freezer as I would have been unable to take some of the shots I took easily with my 7mm RM – shots where “getting closer” was not an option.
Imagine that all rifles and calibers were banned (or never made) except for a bolt action .243. Would any hunter (in the US) really be hindered?
Again, a .243 Win would have limited the number of animals in my freezer over the years. Since I started hunting Colorado game back in 982, I’ve seen more elk wounded and lost with the .243 Win than possibly all other cartridges put together. As a rule I plan on 1500fpe retained energy when hunting elk as one of the limiting factors in determining the effective range of the rifle and cartridge in hand. The .243 Win drops below 1500fpe at around 100 yards to 130 yards, depending on the load. It drops below 1000fpe, my limit for deer, at around 300 yards. While I could probably take game cleanly beyond those ranges, I would much prefer my 7mm RM, .308 Win, .30-06’s or .300 WM for such work.
I could go on here...insert caliber...down to .223 and its short comings on animals deer size and up and .300 Win mag and up with recoil, ammo price/availability, etc.
The .223 is an even worse choice than the .243 Win for my purposes and would have resulted far less meat in the freezer.
As a handloader, my .300WM is only slightly more expensive to feed than my .30-06’s, the difference being the additional powder cost. Since I shoot premium bullets in both, the extra powder cost is marginal.
Again, like Kix's thread...not what caliber is better, has more energy at X, flatter shooting than Y...Just a thought.
The fact is that every cartridge represents a compromise in one area or another. My favorite rifle is my .257 Roberts, which is great for varmints and deer and has low recoil. But I have to handload for it to get the performance I want as factory ammo choices are rather limited.
My 7mm RM was my first big game rifle and has taken lots of prairie dogs, its share of coyotes, as well as antelope, deer and elk. Recoil is about like a .30-06. The .308 Win and .30-06 work fine and I shoot them out to 500 yards on a regular basis. Deer at 500 are meat on the table with either one. If the target was elk I’d be more cautious with the .308 Win, but 425 yards would be no problem. My 7mm RM and .300 WM are my real long range rifles and I’m building a low-recoil 6.5mm-06AI that will join them. The Marlins in .30-30, .375 Win and .45-70 are fun guns and great for the woods but when I get on open plains country or open areas in the forest they are rather limiting when it comes to range. And here in Colorado that happens a lot.
Since 1982 there hasn’t been a shot on big game that I couldn’t have taken just as well with a .308 Win. Not so with the Marlin lever guns, a .223, .243 Win or even my .257 Roberts. Cartridges are not all created equal.