US Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg stunning announcement!

[Cabin4]

Supreme Court Associate Justice, Ruther Bader Ginsberg makes stunning proclamation that the US courts should utilize laws of foreign governments to adjudicate cases!!!!!! Apparently, Ginsberg forgot that her oath of office is to uphold the constitution. This is nothing more than secret code of the far left wing to ignore the constitution and  inflict foreign law on adjudicating cases when the leftist don’t like what the constitution guarantees. This is more proof that our sovereignty as a nation is at risk and that NWO is a real movement. For a judge at any level of our court system to make this type of statement is truly stunning.

Ginsberg is a stunning example of how medical advancements in treating pancreatic cancer can help one person but put 300 million people at risk.

[SHOOTALL]

to know the contex in which she said it would help understand her meaning ( good or bad ) .
The remark about cancer is disrespectful to all that face that illness . IMHO .

[Dixie Dude]

Do you have a source where she said this?  Newspaper, or link?  Need proof to show others. 

[Cabin4]

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/12/us/12ginsburg.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=ruth%20bader%20ginsberg&st=cse

BTW: My comment about cancer is directed towards Judge Ginsberg not the general population of people stricken with pancreatic cancer. When someone rises to this level of power and they can inflict their damage on the entire mass of people,comments like this are warranted. If she died, the entire country would be better off.

[SHOOTALL]

bad taste is never warranted IMO

[Graybeard]

bad taste is never warranted IMO

Prolly not but how much worse taste can be shown than for a US Supreme Court Justice to stand and suggest substitution of foreign law over the US Constitution "THE law of the land" in this nation? She should be immediately impeached and removed.

[Cabin4]

bad taste is never warranted IMO

 the US Constitution "THE law of the land" in this nation? She should be immediately impeached and removed.

I agree, this is clearly grounds for immediate articles of impeachment. She is openly and willingly espousing the violation of the oath she swore to uphold. Every case she adjudicates will now and should now be tainted by her distain for our constitution, the supreme law of this nation.

Hard to comprehend why there is not a wide spread uproar on this. Perhaps it just has not gotten around enough yet.

[stubshaft]

WHAT A CROCK OF POO!

Terrorists everywhere just had a big sigh of relief.  They are not being persecuted in their own countries!

[Oldshooter]

Ginsberg is a stunning example of how medical advancements in treating pancreatic cancer can help one person but put 300 million people at risk.

I have no problem with your comment but if you dont like ginsberg, you sho aint gonna like the leftist biotch that replaces her or any other supreme court justice in the next 4 years!

Odrama will select the next supreme court justice(s)

I kept saying that was the reason not to elect a lefty, and to elect a republican at all cost but it fell on deaf ears, I guess. We will rue the day that more lefties get on the supreme court! you think you dont like odrama, wait till the supreme court determines that the say..........gun control should be the law of the land !  and it only takes a majority and it is coming friend!

[ms]

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/12/us/12ginsburg.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=ruth%20bader%20ginsberg&st=cse

BTW: My comment about cancer is directed towards Judge Ginsberg not the general population of people stricken with pancreatic cancer. When someone rises to this level of power and they can inflict their damage on the entire mass of people,comments like this are warranted. If she died, the entire country would be better off.

I agree.

[dukkillr]

bad taste is never warranted IMO

Agreed.

[Questor]

The cancer has spread to her brain, which appears not to be functioning.

[Cabin4]

The cancer has spread to her brain, which appears not to be functioning.

Hopefully she will croak soon and spare us from the illegal action of applying foreign laws on  American cases. Every case this idiot has presided over should be reviewed to determine if she potentially applied this concept. This is no different than if we found a cop who falsified or tainted evidence to help achieve a conviction. The district attorney’s office is usually pressed into action to perform a historical review of the cases the cop was involved in. Same thing.

[mirage1988]

And do you think o's appointee would be better? Can you Imagine Eric Holder taking her place? The supreme court as it stands is the LEAST of our worries right now!

[Cabin4]

This is the perfect opportunity to make a "federal case" out of this judges oath violation comments. No I do not think the obamantion would apoint one better than Ginsberg. With a 5/4 supreme court, any court pick is critical.

[mirage1988]

The other Justices on the court see her as a handful of pebbles rattling in a tin cup. Hopefully she keeps her seat until the next election.

[gypsyman]

Sense liberal's like Ginsberg like to pick and chose what laws apply, instead of evenly and fairly, and she wants to adjudicate from foreign govt's, I say we pick the one from Muslem terrorists that says to behead or enemy's. Think she'll pick that one.HMMM  gypsyman

[Oldshooter]

I'll hold em fer ya Gypsyman !    just be careful with the blade pard!

[Dee]

The fact of the matter, that the Supreme Court has been allowed to legislate from the bench FOR YEARS, is what should upset everyone. That one member should suggest foreign case law, should not surprise anyone.
This entire process has gotten out of control, and judges IN ANY COURT, should never be APPOINTED, ESPECIALLY FOR LIFE.
Just another fallacy incorporated into a aging, and corrupted system. It all needs to be wiped out, and a new start, with the beginning in D.C.
D.C. is infested with traitors, and hanging should be resurrected, with all expediency, at which time the Constitution, and Bill of Rights should be REINSTATED!

[Questor]

I believe judge kennedy has the same internationalist attitudes. He's not doing his job either.

[SHOOTALL]

G B & Cabin4 , it is the fact that "true" Americans show respect to there enemy even at times of war . We ask for the contex of her statement . It could be that she was looking for a case study that had not been before American court before , then also it could have been as you ( cabin4)decribe . Either way as Americans we should respect a person even if we are going to hang them . That is unless we go the path of the Democraps and destory what so many have died to protect.

[gstewart44]

Sense liberal's like Ginsberg like to pick and chose what laws apply, instead of evenly and fairly, and she wants to adjudicate from foreign govt's, I say we pick the one from Muslem terrorists that says to behead or enemy's. Think she'll pick that one.HMMM  gypsyman

Perhaps she will be influenced enough by muslim sharia law that she will declare herself guilty of taking a man's position (on the bench) and asked to be removed and punished accordingly......

Oh well wishful thinking.

[newstart2k]

I read the referenced article. The judge's remarks seemed thoughtful and educated. No wonder so much uproar here.  

[tn_junk]

I hope Ginsberg makes it at least another 4 years, maybe even 8.
Sometimes the devil you know is a lot better than the devil you don't know. I think
status quo is the best thing we can have on the Supreme Court until Obama leaves
office in 2016.

alan

[Cabin4]

G B & Cabin4 , it is the fact that "true" Americans show respect to there enemy even at times of war . We ask for the contex of her statement . It could be that she was looking for a case study that had not been before American court before , then also it could have been as you ( cabin4)decribe . Either way as Americans we should respect a person even if we are going to hang them . That is unless we go the path of the Democraps and destory what so many have died to protect.

When a politician or in this case a judge, shows as much disrespect for the constitution, I see no need to show them any respect at all. BY them, disrespecting the constitution, they are showing disrespect to me and all Americans for that matter. It's a two way street. Ginsberg’s remarks show that she had issues with supporting the constitution, the law of this land! I/we live in this land and are suppose to have faith that the constitution and our laws represent the principals that we live & operate under. Then, to have a supreme court judge be allowed to evaluate and apply laws not applicable in this nation to a case, is the highest form of supreme disrespect to our country and it’s people. She is an idiot.

[dukkillr]

G B & Cabin4 , it is the fact that "true" Americans show respect to there enemy even at times of war . We ask for the contex of her statement . It could be that she was looking for a case study that had not been before American court before , then also it could have been as you ( cabin4)decribe . Either way as Americans we should respect a person even if we are going to hang them . That is unless we go the path of the Democraps and destory what so many have died to protect.

When a politician or in this case a judge, shows as much disrespect for the constitution, I see no need to show them any respect at all. BY them, disrespecting the constitution, they are showing disrespect to me and all Americans for that matter. It's a two way street. Ginsberg’s remarks show that she had issues with supporting the constitution, the law of this land! I/we live in this land and are suppose to have faith that the constitution and our laws represent the principals that we live & operate under. Then, to have a supreme court judge be allowed to evaluate and apply laws not applicable in this nation to a case, is the highest form of supreme disrespect to our country and it’s people. She is an idiot.

To me the analysis is different.  First, there's being a good person and a good christian... I suspect Jesus would not be proud of those type remarks... BUT, I also want people to read my ideas or thoughts and perhaps be persuaded that I know what I'm talking about.  One of the surest ways to keep people from considering your opinion is to insult them or turn them off.  Just a thought-out rational response should be enough.  Such baited, angry language does nothing to further your cause unless your cause requires you to puff out your chest and preach to the choir.  I've never seen any use in preaching to the choir.

For me, this idea extends to all types of things. 

[Oldshooter]

G B & Cabin4 , it is the fact that "true" Americans show respect to there enemy even at times of war . We ask for the contex of her statement . It could be that she was looking for a case study that had not been before American court before , then also it could have been as you ( cabin4)decribe . Either way as Americans we should respect a person even if we are going to hang them . That is unless we go the path of the Democraps and destory what so many have died to protect.

When a politician or in this case a judge, shows as much disrespect for the constitution, I see no need to show them any respect at all. BY them, disrespecting the constitution, they are showing disrespect to me and all Americans for that matter. It's a two way street. Ginsberg’s remarks show that she had issues with supporting the constitution, the law of this land! I/we live in this land and are suppose to have faith that the constitution and our laws represent the principals that we live & operate under. Then, to have a supreme court judge be allowed to evaluate and apply laws not applicable in this nation to a case, is the highest form of supreme disrespect to our country and it’s people. She is an idiot.

To me the analysis is different.  First, there's being a good person and a good christian... I suspect Jesus would not be proud of those type remarks... BUT, I also want people to read my ideas or thoughts and perhaps be persuaded that I know what I'm talking about.  One of the surest ways to keep people from considering your opinion is to insult them or turn them off.  Just a thought-out rational response should be enough.  Such baited, angry language does nothing to further your cause unless your cause requires you to puff out your chest and preach to the choir.  I've never seen any use in preaching to the choir.

For me, this idea extends to all types of things. 

Pardner I cant say I like you ....yet, but I like and respect your analysis in this area!

[Cabin4]

G B & Cabin4 , it is the fact that "true" Americans show respect to there enemy even at times of war . We ask for the contex of her statement . It could be that she was looking for a case study that had not been before American court before , then also it could have been as you ( cabin4)decribe . Either way as Americans we should respect a person even if we are going to hang them . That is unless we go the path of the Democraps and destory what so many have died to protect.

When a politician or in this case a judge, shows as much disrespect for the constitution, I see no need to show them any respect at all. BY them, disrespecting the constitution, they are showing disrespect to me and all Americans for that matter. It's a two way street. Ginsberg’s remarks show that she had issues with supporting the constitution, the law of this land! I/we live in this land and are suppose to have faith that the constitution and our laws represent the principals that we live & operate under. Then, to have a supreme court judge be allowed to evaluate and apply laws not applicable in this nation to a case, is the highest form of supreme disrespect to our country and it’s people. She is an idiot.

To me the analysis is different.  First, there's being a good person and a good christian... I suspect Jesus would not be proud of those type remarks... BUT, I also want people to read my ideas or thoughts and perhaps be persuaded that I know what I'm talking about.  One of the surest ways to keep people from considering your opinion is to insult them or turn them off.  Just a thought-out rational response should be enough.  Such baited, angry language does nothing to further your cause unless your cause requires you to puff out your chest and preach to the choir.  I've never seen any use in preaching to the choir.

For me, this idea extends to all types of things. 

I'm not writing a newspaper article or giving a speech for the consumption by the general public nor am I preaching to the church assembly. If I was, I would take a different tactic. Here, on GBO it’s a fairly confined group of mostly likeminded thinkers of very similar political persuasion. Yes, I am venting. Even Christians vent. I think Jesus did that too but I never compare myself to Him.

I'm not going to change the style of my writing to appease anyone here. I've made this point crystal clear on other subjects/posts. If you guys feel the need to continue to express that I change my style, your wasting your time.

[SHOOTALL]

Cabin4 speak as you wish as will I .

[Dee]

I'm gettin used to him. I think? He reminds me of....................................ME!