Author Topic: A Reply to glanceblamm regarding tactical aircraft and the gps  (Read 606 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Siskiyou

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3417
  • Gender: Male
glanceblamm:  I decided to create a new topic because I kind of lead us off Bill’s original question.
The question fits because large fires could be called a gathering of gps units, and coordinates.  During initial attack the dispatchers provide aircraft with a LAT/LONG from their base and in the case of Air Tankers a reload base suitable for the size of aircraft.  The bigger the aircraft the larger reload base is needed. 

My hat is off to the pilots and crews.  Many go through their career without a mishap and others go quickly.  Tanker 130 went down when a wing separated from the aircraft.
http://www.wildlandfire.com/pics/air4/cr_c130t.jpg

There has been a change in the way fire fighting aircraft are being kept track of in the air.  The change has come about because of the satellite signals you and I use with our gps units, and new technology that takes advantage of it.  The aircraft from the observer plane (Air Attack), helicopter, Lead Plane, to the Air Tanker are required to have AAF instrumentation.  It is a great system, because the old 15-minute tracking system required very close attention.  Dispatchers and helibase management crews have a timer set for each aircraft in the air.  Now day’s dispatchers still track aircraft but with the advent of AAF some of the burden is lighten.  For a better explanation of AFF check this link. http://earth.google.com/enterprise/us_forest.html The dispatcher still has a timer set for the aircraft but now checks the computer screen to view the location of the aircraft being tracked.  He can click on the aircraft and the N number along with LAT/LONG will show up.  This spring an airtanker disappeared of the screen.  I believe it was on the way to Texas.  The responsible dispatch unit started making calls.  The tanker had hit a mountain and the crew was lost.

Aircraft come from a number of different sources; the Federal Government primary source is contractors for fixed wing, and rotor.  State and local governments use a combination of contract and agency owned aircraft. 

A simple fire might require an Air Attack aircraft, which is flown by contract pilot and carries a highly qualified agency observer in fire suppression.  This is normally the first aircraft over a fire and will radio back a LAT/LONG to the dispatch center, along with a geographic description, status of the fire, and other needs.  He will switch to another channel and line up the airtankers.  He will coordinate air space between the airtankers, helicopters, and the press.

If he orders up Heavy Airtankers a lead plane will be ordered.  The lead plane will fly a drainage and setup the drops for the airtankers.  The lead plane pilot might determine that because of prevailing winds it is unsafe for the aircraft to drop in drainage.  The public needs to remember these are professional fire fighting pilots, not suicide pilots.

If a fire grows into a major event aircraft and crews from afar are requested and assigned to the incident.  Helicopters require a lot of support. Part of the crew goes on the ship and the remainder has to drive to the Incident Base and the Helibase.  They maybe on the road for a day or two driving to the assignment.  All the crews I know of have a Garmin Automotive Gps on the dash of their crew truck and the pickup they use as a chase rig.  Most of the time these are not the latest and greatest gps units.  I have seen a number of older GPSIII+ and GPS 5 units in service.  BUT good old gps units can do a job.  The helicopter contractor will also have support people to maintain the ship on the fire, part of the contract includes a fuel truck.  A fuel truck for a small ship will haul a few hundred gallons of fuel.  A big skycrane requires a lot of fuel and a semi-truck and trailer loaded with fuel will be in route to the fire.  There are a lot of regulations when it involves the transportation of fuel.  If it appears that the fire will last for an extended period of time the contractor will arrange for additional loads of fuel.  Garmin has a gps designed and programmed to fit the need of a big rig driver.
 
https://buy.garmin.com/shop/shop.do?cID=275&pID=31541

Crew members who repel into a fire will have a hand held gps unit with them.  When possible they well land.  Back at the Crew truck they record the LAT/LONG of the crew that has been dropped off.

Large fires will be flown and mapped using gps technology with mapping software.  Incident Command “PEOPLE” will determine the location of drop points for supplies, equipment, and manpower.  A large fire becomes a division of labor which is assigned to overhead, crews, and equipment.  The boundaries of these divisions are indentified on planning mappings along with LAT/LONG coordinates.

Knowing the location of resources is critical when a crew is about to be burned over and air support is needed, or a fire fighter has been injured and needs to be flown out.

This Cobra Fire Fighting helicopter is the first of two planned ships.  I do not know if the other one was completed.  In talking to the pilot of this ship the other one was parts on a hanger floor.



Paired with a support van the helicopter can down link video and inferred data from a fire.  The Incident Commander can view this current data and make informed command decisions.  When there are a lot of large fires burning in the Country life and property takes priority.  Decisions where air resources go are made at the National Level when there is competition for the same resource. 

Fire Suppression pilots are highly qualified.  A few hundred hours will not do it.  One afternoon I was talking to one of the older, and I do mean older pilots.  He was flying off carriers at the end of WWII, flew in the Korean War, and flew missions over North Vietnam in the Vietnam War.  There is no way a person coming up the civilian route could match his flight hours.

I was setting in the shade taking a break talking to a Bell 212 pilot in Idaho.  He had flown his ship down from Alaska where he was working the oil fields.  He had accumulated a lot of hours logging with a helicopter, and then he had his fire time.  We come to realize that he was in my brother’s high school class and I was in his sister’s class.  He flew helicopters in Vietnam.  He claimed to have around 25,000 hours of flight time.  Former military pilots dominate the ranks of fire fighting helicopter, and airtanker pilots.  Five years ago I was bemoaning the aging of this great group of pilots.  The lives and safety of the public and line firefighters are in their hands.  What happens when they grow too old?  Not every pilot is like the old Navy carrier pilot.  My crystal ball did not predict the Iraq, and Afghanistan War.

These former pilots are up to date on the latest navigation instruments in their aircraft.  I have come across a couple that are carrying a Garmin 96C in their brief case.

  https://buy.garmin.com/shop/shop.do?cID=156&pID=277

I have to believe that some are now carrying the 496 and other units higher in the food chain.
https://buy.garmin.com/shop/shop.do?cID=156&pID=6426#specsTab

You need a lot of room when setting up for the big helicopters.  To close to other aircraft on the ground and the rotor wash will flip them over.

A lot of the mechanics that work for a contractor have a military background.  Now days they use a gps to find a helibase in a Montana cow pasture.  I was on a fire in Colorado when one of the large helicopters sucked a bird into the turbine engine.  A few phone calls were made one of which was to the factory in Canada.  A new turbine engine was loaded in the bed of a Chevy pickup and engine was sent to the remote helibase in Colorado.  I do not know if the two drivers in the pickup had a gps but it would have been handy.  Equipment was brought in and the engine was replaced.  This was an all night operation, but the ship was ready for the pilot to take it on a test flight the next morning.

I am not a pilot.
There is a learning process to effectively using a gps.  Do not throw your compass and map away!

Boycott: San Francisco, L.A., Oakland, and City of Sacramento, CA.

Offline Glanceblamm

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2814
Re: A Reply to glanceblamm regarding tactical aircraft and the gps
« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2009, 02:29:01 AM »
Yeah, it was time to move the post and IMO it was worth it based on your reply. Perhaps you should try to hire on as a consultant? Sounds like you know the inner works for sure.

Some of the areas would be a nightmare for sure and it makes great sense that the experienced military pilots would be the ones to use. One of the worst areas that I personally know of would be in the Aspen Colorado area as it is easy to fly a plane into the ground out there. The dispatchers would be great to have around as they can assign vectors to some aircraft (just like air traffic control) while they have others in a holding pattern at various altitudes at a Vor to simplify things. You would think that there might be a conflict with general and commercial aviation and keeping unwanted craft out so maybe the ATC takes on the whole burden for the area that they are responsible for?

VFR or Visual Flight Rule would have to come into play for sure though and it makes great sense to assign a lead plane to drop into that drainage and line up the other craft on a separate channel as said. They could still have the transponder set to the local frequency while doing their own thing with the various nav aids that are available. This is well beyond my expertise but it might not be any worse than coordinating an air show such as the one at Osh Kosh Wisconsin where they might have 30 or more planes in the air at one time during the show but could have hundreds of planes coming or going in between show times.

I have viewed many of these planes and most are authentic to the era...very friendly group and most will answer my dumb questions...it was typical for a pilot to state where he or she flew in from and after quickly scanning the dash, I ask how they got here (Osh Kosh or other shows) as I knew that it was not by Dead Reckoning for the overall distance. In most cases, I was shown a Garmin Gps Unit for aviation that was tucked low under the dash!. Others may have filed an IFR flight plan (those controllers can keep you under their thumb pretty good cept for maybe requested altitude deviation) and requested a visual approach instead of an ILS or GPS approach once they were handed over to the tower.

I like to use the Garmin 1000 for these chores. This is also known as a (dual glass) cockpit as it is much more than a gps.


It replaces conventional engine guages along with the transponder and the standard Nav guages. The big feature is that it is a gps of course but it will still pickup your Vor stations, intersections, and markers not to mention the boundries of a givin air space that you are in as far as the ATC is concerned. Operation is phenominal. I did not know if I could trust this thing at first so I used the conventional Nav1 & Nav2 radios along with the built in glide slope indicator on the left glass panel while watching the GPS do it's thing on the right hand panel.

The bare bones usage of this thing would be nearest (airport) and direct to and you would get a nice straight line on that right hand screen. At the touch of the Nearest button, you can get a complete listing for your area but also have the option of punching in an ID which would be KDEC in the case of the picture. Once you are within the distance required for calling the tower just about any approach that you would want is listed whether it be ILS or GPS. The information is already stored in that garmin and you get a full picture of the runways plus numbers.

The picture is kind of small and kind of dark but a gps approach was selected and the white lines on that right hand screen were drawn after the approach was activated. It even includes re-routing if the pilot would have to tell the tower that he is going around. The plane could be anywhere in or around the KDEC airspace and the auto pilot would fly the approach by itself if that is what you wanted!
After getting used to the Garmin 1000 the only thing bad that I can say about it is that it works so well that it could create a lazy and complacent pilot!.

If you think that the picture that I took of the Mooney Bravo is just a bit fishy you would be correct as I am a simulator pilot and have been since 92 or so. As far as the garmin goes though it is 100% authentic. Instructions for the usage are good but if you are wanting to know more they want you to go to the Garmin site and download the manual!


Offline Siskiyou

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3417
  • Gender: Male
Re: A Reply to glanceblamm regarding tactical aircraft and the gps
« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2009, 05:48:35 PM »
I have not had the pleasure of sitting before a Glass Panel in an airplane.  Every few months I stop at the library and pickup a few months worth of issues of flying magazines.  I like what I read and concept.  When you can integrate a number of functions into a glass panel, the load on the pilot should be reduced.  Without a doubt the Garmin G1000 has to be the cat’s meow.  The transition on the ground from the compass has leaped beyond the automobile to the cockpit in small aircraft.  You do not need a 747 for good instrumentation, just money.

I was impressed when the Garmin 430 and 530 were major advancement in cockpit management.

In 1974 I received an assignment in Southern California; there was no commercial service in Siskiyou County.  A contract Cessna 182 picked me up at Rohrer Field (1O5) and delivered me to El Monte (KEMT). 

The pilot was a nice enough guy, and I enjoyed the flight.  Following I-5 to Southern California.  The pilot and plane were out of Oregon and the pilot had never flown over California and he was not sure of the location of El Monte in the Southern California stew.  He started digging out his maps trying to get orientated about a hundred miles out.  Fortunately I was able to help him out because I respond to and fought fires in the Southland for a number of years.  With me ticking off Sunland, Tujunga, La Crescenta, Pasadena, Sierra Madre, go West he locked into the El Monte airport and he made a good landing.

He would have made it without my input, but he had spent a lot of time looking at the maps, that were spread out across the cockpit.  I was watching for other air traffic while he read the map. 

I would not be surprised that 182 is still flying with the instruments it had that day.  Not every pre-glass panel aircraft is going to be update.  Pilots have been getting from here to there for a lot of years.  That was my first experience flying with a pilot who had not flown the area before.  In the past we used a local pilot who knew the mountains better than we did.

Pilot standards and aircraft standards have improved a lot over the years.  Individual congressmen have tried to ignore safety standards so their buddy could get the contract.  But overall the safety program has paid off.

My delusion of grandeur has been able to fly out of Northern California in a high wing aircraft to locations in Idaho for an elk hunt.  Johnson Creek Airport (3U2) is a beautiful grass strip in elk country.  A couple of other elk hunting strips are Graham USFS Airport U45, and the Weatherby USFS Airport 52U.  I have always wondered if the Weatherby airport was named after Roy Weatherby?  I am talking about gravel runways, tree hazards, and turbulent wind patterns at these locations. 
When I was at the Johnson Creek Airport a Cessna 210 crashed on take-off.  The aircraft was stuffed with gear and the likely cause was over gross, the actual cause was unknown at the time.  Mountain flying has its challenges.  A family friend who owned his airplane crashed in the Idaho Salmon River years ago.  He was an experienced pilot with a lot of years.

I was first introduced to the Garmin eTrex at the Graham Airport.  I drove in there in the gray of early morning, and the sun was blocked by smoke.    I must admit that I knew where I was, but when it came to compass direction I was lost.  When I asked what direction North was a yellow eTrex was pulled out of a pack.  I was only 90-degrees off.  A standard warning for each of these locations is that big game animals maybe on the runway.

https://buy.garmin.com/shop/shop.do?cID=194&pID=8052

http://www.cessna.com/single-engine/cessna-400/cessna-400-avionics.html

P.S.  My father-in-law had a 1963 Moony Mark 21 similar to this:

http://www.airliners.net/photo/Untitled/Mooney-M-20C-Mark/0752340/


There is a learning process to effectively using a gps.  Do not throw your compass and map away!

Boycott: San Francisco, L.A., Oakland, and City of Sacramento, CA.