Different rifling for different purposes. Round ball does better with one type and bullets and conicals do better with others. There is a lot more to it than just width of the grooves. There's depth, and shape etc. Pure lead bullets do better with some types of rifling while other types of rifling are better for the modern copper jacketed bullets. There is no real one size fits all. Modern barrel makers have to balance cost of manufacture and tooling vs quality control, waste etc. I've been to Blue Maountain muzzleloaders in Shartlesville PA and saw those big muzzleloader 60 lb bench guns fired. 62 caliber cloverleafs at 300 yds. Those guns need quite a bit more barrel and specialized rifling than something broached on a mass production line.
Yes perfection plays a part. But so does the type of load and projectile. There are some folks who can shoot nearly anything well, even smooth bores. And tack driving is all relative. But perfection in shooting is a whole class above that. I don't car how well a person can shoot, it isn't likley he'll be winning any national matches with a production line mass produced barrel he got on a gun from wally world. Rifling is not a one size fits all, or we could slap a breech plug on an Mossberg 30-06 barrel and muzzleload it for 150 yd prairie dogs.
Too many of the past top shooters, who were also gun smiths relied on wider grooves than lands. George Shalk, Harry Pope and Emil Pachmayer were the best.