« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Contender Burris mount question  (Read 496 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline ralfus

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Avid Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 106
Contender Burris mount question
« on: July 14, 2009, 11:07:12 AM »
I have a Burris mount for my TC and it has a screw threaded into the top behind the mounting screws and in front of the rear ring location. What is this screw for?
Logged

Offline Ladobe

  • Trade Count: (91)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3193
Re: Contender Burris mount question
« Reply #1 on: July 14, 2009, 12:13:25 PM »
It's a recoil stop screw for the rear ring.   Rear ring is windage adjustable and so not as solid front to back as the dovetail front ring without that screw.  Don't remove it.
Larry
Logged
Evolution at work. Over two million years ago the genus Homo had small cranial capacity and thick skin to protect them from their environment. One species has evolved into obese cranial fatheads with thin skin in comparison that whines about anything and everything as their shield against their environment. Meus

Offline ralfus

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Avid Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 106
Re: Contender Burris mount question
« Reply #2 on: July 14, 2009, 12:30:18 PM »
I have Leupold rings on it now and the screw does not touch the ring, I assume this only works with Burris rings??

I went to the Burris website but there was no info about it.
Logged

Offline Ladobe

  • Trade Count: (91)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3193
Re: Contender Burris mount question
« Reply #3 on: July 16, 2009, 02:28:07 PM »
So you think a Burris LU-T base should also work with Leupold rings not designed for that base?    ::)   Leupold's standard TC bases offered are dual dovetail and quick release.  They do not offer a windage base for the TC's IOW.  Their windage rings are for their standard bases, not the Burris LU base.


   
Logged
Evolution at work. Over two million years ago the genus Homo had small cranial capacity and thick skin to protect them from their environment. One species has evolved into obese cranial fatheads with thin skin in comparison that whines about anything and everything as their shield against their environment. Meus

Offline ralfus

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Avid Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 106
Re: Contender Burris mount question
« Reply #4 on: July 16, 2009, 04:12:16 PM »
Quote from: Ladobe on July 16, 2009, 02:28:07 PM
So you think a Burris LU-T base should also work with Leupold rings not designed for that base?    ::)   Leupold's standard TC bases offered are dual dovetail and quick release.  They do not offer a windage base for the TC's IOW.  Their windage rings are for their standard bases, not the Burris LU base.

 

Thanks for the sarcasm and condescension. It's nice to come to a forum looking for help and getting attitude instead.

Leupold, Millett, Burris and Redfield all make the "rotary dovetail" style rings and they are interchangeable. Redfield designed them in the 1930's and the others copied and they interchange without issue. The Burris LU-T base that I have uses a rotary style arrangement and my Leupold rings fit fine.

Are you also going to tell me that I can't put Leupold QRW rigns on a Weaver base? Same difference.

If the Burris rings are wider front to back and bear against the recoil stop screw then that would be something good to share. If the Burris ring does not touch the recoil stop screw then the brand does not matter, now does it?
Logged

Offline Keith L

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3781
Re: Contender Burris mount question
« Reply #5 on: July 16, 2009, 09:13:30 PM »
I thik Ladobe was trying to share some informatin with you, not to start a fight.  We don't do that here at GBO.  In fact folks that do don't last long here.
Logged
"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy."  Benjamin Franklin
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »