Author Topic: Michelle Obama - 1st Lady Run Amuck (Read 1856 times)

Cabin4 · « **on:** August 13, 2009, 05:24:04 AM »

Apparenlty when the American people elected Obama president, they also voted in a new branch of the federal government. It appears as though Michele Obama has developed a parrallel exectutive staff that which is unmatched in American 1st Lady history. SO read on what the facists are doing inthe White House. While the economy is in drink and this president and congress blow our tax money like cocaine adicts, the first lady is following along in kremlin fashion.

The Queen and her Court...
There has never been anyone in the White House at any time that has created such an army of staffers whose sole duties are the facilitation of the First Lady's social life. One wonders why she needs so much help, at taxpayer expense, when even Hillary, only had three; Jackie Kennedy one; Laura Bush one; and prior to Mamie Eisenhower social help came from the President's own pocket.

1. $172,2000 - Sher, Susan (Chief Of Staff)
2. $140,000 - Frye, Jocelyn C. (Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of Policy And Projects For The First Lady)
3. $113,000 - Rogers, Desiree G. (Special Assistant to the President and White House Social Secretary)
4. $102,000 - Johnston, Camille Y. (Special Assistant to the President and Director of Communications for the First Lady)
5. Winter, Melissa E. (Special Assistant to the President and Deputy Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)
6. $90,000 - Medina , David S. (Deputy Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)
7. $84,000 - Lelyveld, Catherine M. (Director and Press Secretary to the First Lady)
8. $75,000 - Starkey , Frances M . (Director of Scheduling and Advance for the First Lady)
9. $70,000 - Sanders, Trooper (Deputy Director of Policy and Projects for the First Lady)
10. $65,000 - Burnough, Erinn J. (Deputy Director and Deputy Social Secretary)
11. Reinstein, Joseph B. (Deputy Director and Deputy Social Secretary)
12. $62,000 - Goodman, Jennifer R. (Deputy Director of Scheduling and Events Coordinator For The First Lady)
13. $60,000 - Fitts, Alan O. (Deputy Director of Advance and Trip Director for the First Lady)
14. Lewis, Dana M. (Special Assistant and Personal Aide to the First Lady)
15. $52,500 - Mustaphi, Semonti M. (Associate Director and Deputy Press Secretary To The First Lady)
16. $50,000 - Jarvis, Kristen E. (Special Assistant for Scheduling and Traveling Aide To The First Lady)
17. $45,000 - Lechtenberg, Tyler A. (Associate Director of Correspondence For The First Lady)
18. Tubman, Samantha (Deputy Associate Director, Social Office)
&nb sp;19. $40,000 - Boswell, Joseph J. (Executive Assistant to the Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)
20. $36,000 - Armbruster, Sally M. (Staff Assistant to the Social Secretary)
21. Bookey, Natalie (Staff Assistant)
22. Jackson, Deilia A. (Deputy Associate Director of Correspondence for the First Lady)

This adds up to $1,216,200 and the salary list is not complete.

This does not include makeup artist Ingrid Grimes-Miles, 49, and "First Hairstylist" Johnny Wright, 31, both of whom travelled aboard Air Force One to Europe .

Note who wrote the story; not the U.S. press, but the Canadian Free Press. Kudos to them!

Copyright 2009 Canada Free Press.Com

rockbilly · « **Reply #1 on:** August 13, 2009, 06:06:25 AM »

Did you expect anything different from them? She has been on a free ride all her life, why not continue and suck the public dry!

gypsyman · « **Reply #2 on:** August 13, 2009, 06:11:00 AM »

This is the stuff that fires me up more than the stupid stimulis deals. All these D.C. politicians have more perks/benifits than anybody can ever find out about, costing taxpayers in the 10's of millions of dollars. Eliminate these costly do nothing jobs and save millions of tax dollars. gypsyman

ms · « **Reply #3 on:** August 13, 2009, 06:19:26 AM »

You guys don't like black people or what?

powderman · « **Reply #4 on:** August 13, 2009, 06:36:33 AM »

No reason for our tax $s being thrown away on her. She has no duties, she has a husband making big bucks. POWDERMAN.

Badnews Bob · « **Reply #5 on:** August 13, 2009, 07:11:04 AM »

Quote from: ms on August 13, 2009, 06:19:26 AM

You guys don't like black people or what?

And what does this have to do with her being black? Just mentioning that in this thread is totally stupid!

Questor · « **Reply #6 on:** August 13, 2009, 07:28:04 AM »

It is better that she does this. It is obvously lavish. The public is taking note. It will be used against them after he starts to crash.

In fact, it's already being used against them because it is making news worldwide.

bkraft · « **Reply #7 on:** August 13, 2009, 07:40:14 AM »

And all of this suprises anybody ...why?

SHOOTALL · « **Reply #8 on:** August 13, 2009, 07:58:41 AM »

its not just more affirmative action putting peoplr to work ?

Cabin4 · « **Reply #9 on:** August 13, 2009, 08:07:08 AM »

Quote from: Badnews Bob on August 13, 2009, 07:11:04 AM

Quote from: ms on August 13, 2009, 06:19:26 AM
You guys don't like black people or what?

And what does this have to do with her being black? Just mentioning that in this thread is totally stupid!

Thats always the tactic used to divert from the truth. Ignore the facts and play the race card. The press in this country uses that in defense of Obama's horrible and unconstitutional polices and practices all day long. Yet they ignore the fact that white people put Obama in office. People just think this president, his corrupt administration and his cronies in congress are destroying our country. That we know for a fact.

SHOOTALL · « **Reply #10 on:** August 13, 2009, 08:15:55 AM »

never saw a race card ,

Badnews Bob · « **Reply #11 on:** August 13, 2009, 08:20:23 AM »

Nor I, this has nothing to do with race or skin color.

SHOOTALL · « **Reply #12 on:** August 13, 2009, 08:22:13 AM »

but a lot to do with American culture , or lack there of !

crustaceous · « **Reply #13 on:** August 13, 2009, 08:47:34 AM »

Were you complaining during the last administration?

http://www.nationaljournal.com/about/njweekly/stories/2007/whsalaries.htm

2007 Salaries- Laura Bush's staff
McBride, Anita B. Assistant to the president and chief of staff to the first lady $168,000.00

Harder, Cherie S. Special asistant to the president for domestic policy and director of project of the first lady $108,000.00

Niemiec, Sally M. Press secretary to the First Lady $90,000.00

Miller, Sonja M. Deputy chief of staff to the first lady $84,700.00

Ballard, Deanna M. Director of scheduling for the First Lady $75,000.00

Underwood, Carrie P. Deputy director of policy and projects for the First Lady $65,000.00

Wallace, Charity N. Director of advance for the First Lady $65,000.00

Marshall, Misty C. Director of correspondence for the first lady $59,700.00

Etter, Marisa L. Deputy director of scheduling for the First Lady $50,000.00

King, Kristin N. Deputy director of advance for the first lady $50,000.00

Lineweaver, Lindsey M. Special assistant and personal aide to the first lady $47,500.00

Rawson, Kimberly D. Executive assistant to the chief of staff to the First Lady $46,200.00

Donoghue , Tarah C. Deputy press secretary to the First Lady $43,000.00

Vogel, Campbell B. Deputy director of correspondence for the First Lady $42,500.00

Block, Jonathan F. Assistant press secretary to the First Lady $39,000.00

Cabin4 · « **Reply #14 on:** August 13, 2009, 10:29:07 AM »

No. Luara Bush's staff was no more than 2 at any point in time. Over the course of 8 years all of those may have worked for her, but never all at once. Michelle had ramped up her staff and all these people are one payroll at one time. This is a significant differance.

Michelle Obama, the 1st lady run amuck.

powderman · « **Reply #15 on:** August 13, 2009, 11:11:09 AM »

Crusty. Like cabin 4 said. Wrong. How can you still support osama??? Seems you're defending this travesty. POWDERMAN.

Graybeard · « **Reply #16 on:** August 13, 2009, 11:47:08 AM »

Crusty is an awoved bleeding heart liberal. He thinks dumocraps can do no wrong. What the heck he is at a site like this for other than to harrass the rest of us I have no clue. How a person could be a gun owner and shooter or hunter and support such a liberal agenda is beyond my ability to comprehend.

Cabin4 · « **Reply #17 on:** August 13, 2009, 11:59:04 AM »

Quote from: Graybeard on August 13, 2009, 11:47:08 AM

How a person could be a gun owner and shooter or hunter and support such a liberal agenda is beyond my ability to comprehend.

It's likely due to a supreme inability to focus and or comprehend on our constitution and it’s meaning.

Both parties stink, but this administration and the leadership in congress will make the Guinness Book of World records for the most corrupt and unconstitutional bunch of thugs ever. We are well on the road to becoming a banana republic that has just elected a kangaroo judge to the supreme court, now soon to become the supreme kangaroo court.

crustaceous · « **Reply #18 on:** August 13, 2009, 01:19:15 PM »

More liberal than you guys, yes. Bleeding heart, I don’t think so, but you’re welcome to use what ever label makes you happy.
I like coming here to get the grassroots conservative take on the political landscape. I do enjoy commenting on what I consider misleading or false statements. I don’t care if I change your mind, I’m just throwing out some food for thought.
In this case, Michelle Obamas staff costs appear high. Is it that much higher than the norm. I don’t believe so. If you think Laura Bush, Hillary Clinton, Barbara Bush or Nancy Regan got by with a staff of one, I think you’re mistaken. The salaries I posted are for one year, as reported to the congress by the whitehouse. Fortunately this seems to be a hot topic and I’m sure there will be more about it in the future.
If you think the first lady shouldn't have a staff that's one thing, If you think it's just Obama I don't agree.

slim rem 7 · « **Reply #19 on:** August 13, 2009, 02:24:18 PM »

well spies have been known to turn up in funny places but this guys pretty above board with his opinions..this aint no democracy tho an GB don t seem to be encouraging you membership..
i rent from a fine black lady who is executor to an estate that includes the house i rent...they all live in maryland...
she was surprised when my wife mentioned we had been here a year..the guy that rented it to us said he was family ,,an got $5000,last yea,, rent from us last year...he told this executor we had moved in a month or so ago,,,she is angry...she said her mother tried continually to have the fella contact her...this from her death bed... so its my opinion no race has a lock on being sorry as heck. jmo slim
ps one of these people is a fine lady ,,the other to be pityed...hes my age an hasn t learned any better... both african heritage,, slim

powderman · « **Reply #20 on:** August 13, 2009, 03:46:26 PM »

No reason for any 1st lady to have a govt funded staff. They want help fixing their hair, or scheduling a facial, PAY FOR IT YOURSELF. POWDERMAN.

billy_56081 · « **Reply #21 on:** August 13, 2009, 03:57:42 PM »

I'm sure she needed her hood rat homies there.

Cabin4 · « **Reply #22 on:** August 13, 2009, 04:21:09 PM »

Quote from: crustaceous on August 13, 2009, 01:19:15 PM

More liberal than you guys, yes. Bleeding heart, I don’t think so, but you’re welcome to use what ever label makes you happy.
I like coming here to get the grassroots conservative take on the political landscape. I do enjoy commenting on what I consider misleading or false statements. I don’t care if I change your mind, I’m just throwing out some food for thought.
In this case, Michelle Obamas staff costs appear high. Is it that much higher than the norm. I don’t believe so. If you think Laura Bush, Hillary Clinton, Barbara Bush or Nancy Regan got by with a staff of one, I think you’re mistaken. The salaries I posted are for one year, as reported to the congress by the whitehouse. Fortunately this seems to be a hot topic and I’m sure there will be more about it in the future.
If you think the first lady shouldn't have a staff that's one thing, If you think it's just Obama I don't agree.

The second paragraph of my opening post acknowledges that prior first ladies had staff. But Michelle Obama has 10X the staff of most. I think that is severe & excessive. What the heck does any first lady needs that may staffers. SHe has more staffers than a US Senator. Its pathetic.

nomosendero · « **Reply #23 on:** August 13, 2009, 04:39:54 PM »

Quote from: Cabin4 on August 13, 2009, 04:21:09 PM

Quote from: crustaceous on August 13, 2009, 01:19:15 PM
More liberal than you guys, yes. Bleeding heart, I don’t think so, but you’re welcome to use what ever label makes you happy.
I like coming here to get the grassroots conservative take on the political landscape. I do enjoy commenting on what I consider misleading or false statements. I don’t care if I change your mind, I’m just throwing out some food for thought.
In this case, Michelle Obamas staff costs appear high. Is it that much higher than the norm. I don’t believe so. If you think Laura Bush, Hillary Clinton, Barbara Bush or Nancy Regan got by with a staff of one, I think you’re mistaken. The salaries I posted are for one year, as reported to the congress by the whitehouse. Fortunately this seems to be a hot topic and I’m sure there will be more about it in the future.
If you think the first lady shouldn't have a staff that's one thing, If you think it's just Obama I don't agree.

The second paragraph of my opening post acknowledges that prior first ladies had staff. But Michelle Obama has 10X the stakk of most. I think that is severe & excessive. What the heck does any fisrt lady needs that may staffers. SHe has more staffers than a US Senator. Its pathetic.

Yes & this is just a little past 1/2 year of this group. We ALL know (LIBS Incl.) that the list will grow as time goes on & outdo others even more.

powderman · « **Reply #24 on:** August 13, 2009, 04:58:05 PM »

Don't forget the shopping trips to Paris with the girls, 8 vehicles, bodyguards, her staff and cook, all at taxpayers expense, ohh, and the trip to Chicago for a date with hubby osama to go out to eat, also paid for by, uhhhh yep, you and me. POWDERMAN.

gypsyman · « **Reply #25 on:** August 14, 2009, 02:01:59 AM »

Don't see any of the major news reporting on this, but they seem to want to hammer on Sarah Palin. HMM!! Fairness in the news. Don't bet on it. gypsyman

SHOOTALL · « **Reply #26 on:** August 14, 2009, 02:02:59 AM »

Whats fair , she goes under total observation from the world . Gives up any idea of privacy . Is what the world judges America with regard to taste and culture etc.
I don't like abuse either , and did not vote for her husban so i have no dog in the fight . To be honest i don't care for the way things are going .
But what is fair for her use of GOvt. funds ? Why did she have to fly to those places ? was the shopping a side trip or the trip ? was the date nessary and she was comming from other Govt. work she was expected to attend first ?
I encourage voicing opinion of her husban's deeds and such but it seems hitting below the belt to attack family , like stuping to demo tatics .

powderman · « **Reply #27 on:** August 14, 2009, 02:19:31 AM »

Attacking family??? Hardly. Who you think approved these wasteful expenses??? YEP, osama. POWDERMAN.

SHOOTALL · « **Reply #28 on:** August 14, 2009, 04:39:17 AM »

Knew that would get a rise

hunt-m-up · « **Reply #29 on:** August 14, 2009, 05:43:49 AM »

Nothing real surprising though, he got voted in like a rock star in a foolish ignorant popularity contest and now he's going to live like it on our dime. Michelle Obama couldn't carry Laura Bush's bed pan when it comes to class and style.