Author Topic: 5.56 vs .223  (Read 920 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Drollerindy

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 66
  • Gender: Male
5.56 vs .223
« on: August 14, 2009, 10:44:07 PM »
What is the concensus on shooting 5.56 ammo in TC .223 barrels?
I contacted TC and they said "not recommended."

Doug

Offline securitysix

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 558
Re: 5.56 vs .223
« Reply #1 on: August 15, 2009, 10:05:13 PM »
I contacted TC and they said "not recommended."

Sounds like that's your answer right there.  5.56 is loaded to higher pressures than .223, which will result in higher backthrust.  While that may not be an issue for the Encore since it can handle things like the .300 Winchester Magnum and the .375 H&H Magnum, I definitely wouldn't try it with the Contender.

Offline SD Handgunner

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 658
Re: 5.56 vs .223
« Reply #2 on: August 16, 2009, 05:07:16 AM »
No it is not a good idea to shoot 5.56mm Ammo in a Commercial .223 Remington Chamber. As has been stated the 5.56mm Ammo is loaded to higher chamber pressures than Commercial .223 Remington Ammo. Military Rifles have a longer chamber throat to bleed off some of the pressure as this ammo is loaded to higher pressures to ensure cycling of semi auto rifles.

Larry
T/C Handguns, one good shot for your moment of truth !

Offline billy_56081

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8575
  • Gender: Male
Re: 5.56 vs .223
« Reply #3 on: August 16, 2009, 05:24:12 AM »
No it is not a good idea to shoot 5.56mm Ammo in a Commercial .223 Remington Chamber. As has been stated the 5.56mm Ammo is loaded to higher chamber pressures than Commercial .223 Remington Ammo.
Larry


Now I don't know about shooting one in the other causing a problem. But what I can tell you in the above thate does not make sense is," Military Rifles have a longer chamber throat to bleed off some of the pressure as this ammo is loaded to higher pressures to ensure cycling of semi auto rifles". The reason I say this is that, 1 having a longer throat will lower pressures, and 2 pressures at the gas port will be much more effected by the burning rate of the powder than the initial chamber peak pressure which is reached when the bullet is in the very beguinning of the barrel.
99% of all Lawyers give the other 1% a bad name. What I find hilarious about this is they are such an arrogant bunch, that they all think they are in the 1%.

Offline securitysix

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 558
Re: 5.56 vs .223
« Reply #4 on: August 16, 2009, 02:40:25 PM »
No it is not a good idea to shoot 5.56mm Ammo in a Commercial .223 Remington Chamber. As has been stated the 5.56mm Ammo is loaded to higher chamber pressures than Commercial .223 Remington Ammo.
Larry


Now I don't know about shooting one in the other causing a problem. But what I can tell you in the above thate does not make sense is," Military Rifles have a longer chamber throat to bleed off some of the pressure as this ammo is loaded to higher pressures to ensure cycling of semi auto rifles". The reason I say this is that, 1 having a longer throat will lower pressures, and 2 pressures at the gas port will be much more effected by the burning rate of the powder than the initial chamber peak pressure which is reached when the bullet is in the very beguinning of the barrel.

5.56x45mm NATO chambers do, indeed, have a longer throat than commercial .223 Remington chambers.  The military spec. ammo is loaded to higher pressures to meet a particular velocity specification.  The higher pressures resulting from a commercial spec. chamber can cause extraction and other cycling problems.

There is also a chamber known as the .223 Wylde, which is effectively a 5.56x45mm NATO Match chamber.  It has a shorter throat than the NATO chamber, which helps accuracy, but a longer throat than the .223 Remington chamber to help keep pressure from building too quickly.  The Wylde chamber was designed to get better accuracy from NATO spec. ammo while still keeping pressures relatively safe.

.223 vs. 5.56

Offline southernutah

  • Trade Count: (25)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 560
Re: 5.56 vs .223
« Reply #5 on: August 17, 2009, 08:06:37 AM »
the 556 usually has 62gr or larger FMJs  and rifles have longer throats to handle the longer bullets ,  my contender chamber has a shorter throat than most of my other 223 rifles so I  load all my 223 to fit it so I can use the ammo in anything I have.

Offline SD Handgunner

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 658
Re: 5.56 vs .223
« Reply #6 on: August 17, 2009, 03:20:05 PM »
No it is not a good idea to shoot 5.56mm Ammo in a Commercial .223 Remington Chamber. As has been stated the 5.56mm Ammo is loaded to higher chamber pressures than Commercial .223 Remington Ammo.
Larry


Now I don't know about shooting one in the other causing a problem. But what I can tell you in the above thate does not make sense is," Military Rifles have a longer chamber throat to bleed off some of the pressure as this ammo is loaded to higher pressures to ensure cycling of semi auto rifles". The reason I say this is that, 1 having a longer throat will lower pressures, and 2 pressures at the gas port will be much more effected by the burning rate of the powder than the initial chamber peak pressure which is reached when the bullet is in the very beguinning of the barrel.

If you do some reading on the subject that is what you will find. One such source is the Ammo Oracle.

It doesn't make sence to me either.

Larry
T/C Handguns, one good shot for your moment of truth !

Offline jason280

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (7)
  • A Real Regular
  • *****
  • Posts: 539
Re: 5.56 vs .223
« Reply #7 on: August 18, 2009, 07:12:55 PM »
I would go with the factory, and hold off on shooting 5.56 ammo in the Contender.
"Hey Peter, check out Channel 9!!"